Ocho Cinco In B&G

[freddyg12]

Originally Posted by Rajmahal33

What does "50% better" exactly mean?

Would we have scored 50% more points?
Would we have 50% more passing yards or completion %?
Would we have scored 50% of the time more in the red zone?
Would we have won 50% more games?
Or is it just some sort of arbitrary metric established to make some sensational claim?

I'll take arbitrary metrics for 50!

So glad ocho & Cutler are not in b&g, hope it stays that way too.

[BleedBurgundy]

Originally Posted by firstdown

You really think one WR would make our team 50% better?

I'd say more like 50% as good as we were last year.

[Stuck in TX]

another link Chad Ochocinco Gets Face Tattoos -- NFL FanHouse

wreckless attitude...check
complete disregard for authority...check
face tattoo...check

this guy is one rape away from being Mike Tyson. Wonder if he is any good at boxing?

[tryfuhl]

what the bump

[mredskins]

Originally Posted by Stuck in TX

another link Chad Ochocinco Gets Face Tattoos -- NFL FanHouse

wreckless attitude...check
complete disregard for authority...check
face tattoo...check

this guy is one rape away from being Mike Tyson. Wonder if he is any good at boxing?

that is pretty bad dude. Rape is a pretty big step and I hardly think chad is a raptists.

[jsarno]

Those don't even look real. They look like those ink tats you have to apply water to first. Think about it, anyone that gets a tattoo knows that you scab up and it's darkest after you first get it...those look like they are about 10 years old with fading. Those are fakes.

[DBUCHANON101]

We have a good young group of wr's, leave it alone

[SmootSmack]

Originally Posted by tryfuhl

what the bump

Yeah no kidding.

[SBXVII]

Originally Posted by Stuck in TX

another link Chad Ochocinco Gets Face Tattoos -- NFL FanHouse

wreckless attitude...check
complete disregard for authority...check
face tattoo...check

this guy is one rape away from being Mike Tyson. Wonder if he is any good at boxing?

I don't know about the rape part? but he was boxing or rather training like a boxer. lol. I wonder if he has tendancies to bite ears?

As far as the 50% goes.....well I feel that if we had anyone opposite Moss worth their weight in gold yes we would have scored more points and perhaps have been 50% better. I mean the defense was for the most part carrying their load so if the offense is not and one person can make a difference then yes 50% better. Maybe I should have said 10% better considering their is 11 people on offense.

Look I made up a number. Ok. big deal. I finally change my tune as to not wanting CJ and get my head bit off by the very people who don't want CJ? go figure.

[dall-assblows]

there fake anyway cause it says it. and plussss anyone who has gotten a tattoo knows they dont look like that right after, there SWOLLEN like hell right after and for the next week or two.

ocho addicted to attention cinco

[WaldSkins]

Originally Posted by Rajmahal33

What does "50% better" exactly mean?

Would we have scored 50% more points?
Would we have 50% more passing yards or completion %?
Would we have scored 50% of the time more in the red zone?
Would we have won 50% more games?
Or is it just some sort of arbitrary metric established to make some sensational claim?

That would probaly mean we would only need to score like 8 more points a game. I could see CJ giving us that, hell i could see Malcom Kelly doing that.

[53Fan]

Originally Posted by SBXVII

I don't know about the rape part? but he was boxing or rather training like a boxer. lol. I wonder if he has tendancies to bite ears?

As far as the 50% goes.....well I feel that if we had anyone opposite Moss worth their weight in gold yes we would have scored more points and perhaps have been 50% better. I mean the defense was for the most part carrying their load so if the offense is not and one person can make a difference then yes 50% better. Maybe I should have said 10% better considering their is 11 people on offense.

Look I made up a number. Ok. big deal. I finally change my tune as to not wanting CJ and get my head bit off by the very people who don't want CJ? go figure.

Damnit Man! Where'd you get that number!!! 50%? 50%?!!!

[GTripp0012]

Man, when this thread was created Ochocinco was two words.

[GusFrerotte]

Originally Posted by Schneed10

For some reason there's this perception that Chad Johnson is a malcontent and a locker room problem. Just because he comes up with funky celebrations and is flashy doesn't mean he's not a team player. The guy posts 1400 yard seasons every year.

As for yelling at his QB, the only time I've EVER seen him do that was this year. And is that even really a big problem? QBs and WRs can yell at each other. It happens because they're passionate and want to win. Yelling at each other does not prohibit them from playing well the next time they go back out on the field. Chad Johnson is not the kind of guy who will stop trying (like Randy Moss in Oakland) when things don't go well. He may yell at JC, but he'll still come out to practice and work hard with JC to get it right.

He's said some things about players and coaches in Cinci, but you know what, he's right. That team has ignored character. In fact, CJ is one of their GOOD character guys. He works hard, he delivers consistent performances, and he stays out of trouble. But he's surrounded by morons who break the law and coached by a guy who totally ignores it all (Marvin Lewis). The Bengals deserve criticism and Chad Johnson deserves better.

Anyone who thinks Chad is a bad guy is not paying close enough attention. Celebrations do not mean he's selfish. He's a bit of a diva, but can you say he doesn't work hard?

He isn't necessarily a bad guy, but do you really need a diva type coming in and taking over the team? He might piss of Santana, Cooley, Randle El, or even JC if things don't go his way. I agree with a previous poster, try and develop some of these young guys that will stay longer and come at a cheaper initial price. It is time to get dirty and build an actual team and quit this sexy FA pick garbage.

[GMScud]

Why are we even discussing this anymore? The Bengals thankfully saved us from ourselves last year by not accepting two first round picks (we wouldn't have Orakpo, Kelly, Thomas, or Fred Davis) for Chad.

Whether or not he would have been a good member of the B&G we will never know. But he's a Bengal and it's going to stay that way. End of story really.