![]() |
|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
View Poll Results: Should the Skins try to acquire Michael Vick? | |||
Yes |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
71 | 32.42% |
No |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
148 | 67.58% |
Voters: 219. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Age: 54
Posts: 5,006
|
Re: The Vick Factor
If we bring Vick in it cannot be as a starting QB, regardless of when it occurs. Anyone who considers this is just foolish.
However, I think he could be great as an 'athlete' whether it is in a Wildcat type of deal or a full house backfield (Sellers and Vick lined up behind the inside cheek of the G at 4 yards back, Portis or Betts lined up directly behind the QB at 6 yards back) or a wing T formation.. Giving him 8-12 touches a game to either run, throw or catch the ball would give defenses something to really think about. I don't have any moral objections to bringing Vick in but it will be Shanahan's call next offseason if we are ever in a position to consider it.
__________________
Paintrain's Redskins Fandom 1981-2014 I'm not dead but this team is dead to me...but now that McCloughan is here they may have new life! Jay Gruden = Zorny McSpurrier Kirk Cousins = Next Grossman |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
The Starter
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 1,373
|
Re: The Vick Factor
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Age: 54
Posts: 5,006
|
Re: The Vick Factor
Quote:
It was pretty much tongue in cheek, as most of my Shanahan references are since so many people are convinced the season is already over, in May.
__________________
Paintrain's Redskins Fandom 1981-2014 I'm not dead but this team is dead to me...but now that McCloughan is here they may have new life! Jay Gruden = Zorny McSpurrier Kirk Cousins = Next Grossman |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|