Fences to Mend?

[Ruhskins]

Originally Posted by skinsfan69

Landry is a punk ass loser who tackles like a bitch and then showboats when he makes a routine play. He needs to grow up or they need to just cut him outright. If he was a 4th or 5th round draft pick he's be on the bench. All those sacks didn't make the defense any better did it? I get so tired of everyone around here crying about getting more sacks and not looking at the big picture. We got more sacks. BIG DEAL. We gave up more points and more big plays so who cares?

Well that's the FO's fault. Haynesworth came and created more sacks period. The FO should've realized that they don't need just more sacks, but they were an absent minded group and couldn't put together a peewee team.

[Beneil (diehard since 87)]

Originally Posted by skinsfan69

All those sacks didn't make the defense any better did it? ... We got more sacks. BIG DEAL. We gave up more points and more big plays so who cares?

Yes getting more sacks IS a big deal. and No, the big plays have NOTHING TO DO with Haynesworth. Instead of bad talking a man who contributed, why not question why Carlos Rogers is still here!?! HE is the one who gave up the most memorable big plays. I'd tather have an aging Shawn Springs than watch Carlos bite every fake move a receiver tries on him. You don't curse at the radiator when a tire blows.

Yeah, so he sits out some plays. You know what, when the game is on the line and he's on the side huffing on oxygen, i get mad too. I'm not gonna lye, i'll be yellin at the screen like "We ain'g payin you fat butt a bajillion dollars to sit while the enemy is in the RED ZONE!" but the man is double teamed EVERY PLAY and pushing about 6-700 pounds around non-stop! A sack is better than an incomplete. Yards are lost. QBs are rattled. Crowds get hyped. THE WHOLE DEFENSE get's hyped! Sacks are important!

[Beemnseven]

Originally Posted by skinsfan69

Landry is a punk ass loser who tackles like a bitch and then showboats when he makes a routine play. He needs to grow up or they need to just cut him outright. If he was a 4th or 5th round draft pick he's be on the bench. Tackling has nothing to do with him being out of position. All those sacks didn't make the defense any better did it? I get so tired of everyone around here crying about getting more sacks and not looking at the big picture. We got more sacks. BIG DEAL. We gave up more points and more big plays so who cares?

I think the distinction here is actually quarterback pressure. For years it seemed like our D wasn't even getting close to rattling the QB. He would have all day to throw, and without getting any sort of pressure it didn't translate into errant throws and hence, we didn't get many turnovers.

This year the pressure was better, but other parts of the D fell off.

[Trample the Elderly]

Originally Posted by Beneil (diehard since 87)

Am i the only sane person here? I can't believe that the first response to this thead was "Eff both of them" !?!?!

Landry's effectiveness was hindered by him not playing the position he is best at. Albert's performance was also hindered due to the system, and in SPITE if that fact he contributed to the only bright side to our ugly season. If you don't attribute Albert's contribution to Orakpo's stunning rookie season and Andre Carter's 'awakening' then you aren't paying attention.

We have nobody better than Landry in his position and we WONT get one in the draft. (with what we need, we BETTER not get one in the draft). As a matter of fact, Landry is better at EITHER safety position than either of the guys we have!

Eff them!?! What, did you not watch us get ran over without Albert? Remember the second Cowboys game? They practicaly DARED us to stop them. They ran right up the middle like 12 times in one possesion!?!? They were like "EFF YALLS LINE!" and bowlin' fools over!

You guys are so fickle. You guys throw skinz under the bus more than Portis ever did. At least Portis talked bad about people that actually $uck! Like Sellers, who's run blocking skills is gone and who fumbled away our win against the Saints and other teams. Who else did he trash... Oh yeah... ZORN!! How DARE he! Worn is the best coach ever! His playcalling skills are unquestionable! His powerful stern leadership rivals the greats through history!

You guys make me ashamed to pull out my Redskins wallet whenever i pay for things. I pull out the wallet and now i'm gonna think people will think I'm one of you fools who will dump on a QB that compares to McNabb with worse receivers, worse line, worse coaching, retarded playcalling, and little help from punk @$$ turncoat fans. Throw dirt on a HB right after a probowl year and call him old while having RIGGINS as the man when he was old as DIRT when he was drillin' fools over! A man comes to a team that had several games without sacks one year and puts a man on each side of him into the DOUBLE DIGITS and you call him FAT ALBERT and are ready to trade him AS IF ANYONE WILL PAY A BAJILLION BUCKS FOR HIM !?!??!

You bunch of ... UGH!!

I bet you guys sleep real good in your Dallas Cowboys Snuggies and your pink Tony Romo jerseys...

Yall don't know football

I know what 4-12 is. How about this? MF Landry and Haynesworth, and every other overpriced crybaby on the squad right in the ear.

[Beneil (diehard since 87)]

Originally Posted by Trample the Elderly

I know what 4-12 is. How about this? MF Landry and Haynesworth, and every other overpriced crybaby on the squad right in the ear.

Lame. "MF" is all you got? That is so lame.

Oh, and why do people act like Albert has a plethora of complaining quotes when all i can find is one statement that he wasn't used to his fullest potential and that he said that Orakpo wasn't either. yall act like he was crying like T.O. does or showing up at press conferences screaming "This team is dumb! I hate everyone! Gimme money! Go Cowboys!"

Oh, and if you weren't paying attention, MOST of the overpaid players have already been dropped. Albert happens to be the highest paid.

[Trample the Elderly]

Originally Posted by Beneil (diehard since 87)

Lame. "MF" is all you got? That is so lame.

Oh, and why do people act like Albert has a plethora of complaining quotes when all i can find is one statement that he wasn't used to his fullest potential and that he said that Orakpo wasn't either. yall act like he was crying like T.O. does or showing up at press conferences screaming "This team is dumb! I hate everyone! Gimme money! Go Cowboys!"

Oh, and if you weren't paying attention, MOST of the overpaid players have already been dropped. Albert happens to be the highest paid.

What are you his agent? You can't argue 4-12. That's all there is to it. No, actually I haven't been paying attention. I've been fornicating and trying to forget the misery of last season.

[Beneil (diehard since 87)]

Originally Posted by Trample the Elderly

What are you his agent? You can't argue 4-12. That's all there is to it. No, actually I haven't been paying attention. I've been fornicating and trying to forget the misery of last season.

If you rate players solely by wins and losses, forgetting that it's a team effort, then Barry Sanders was a crappy runningback that could make highlight reels but couldn't win games, Dan Marino was a choke artist that couldn't win the big one, i can go on, but it's obviously pointless with you. 4-12 means NOTHING if you are looking at just one player. I guess you think Orakpo was a bust huh? Sure he made the pro-bowl, but 4-12 means he was obviously crap.

Look, you can't lump the win-loss total as a QB statistic. It's false advertising. Thinking like that gives the wrong people credit for a win. Who won those patiot superbowls? Vinetari or Brady? How many did they win without him? Remember all those fumbles Thurman Thomas had against the Giants? Then they blamed the loss on a Scott Norwood missed fieldgoal!? Well, it was the final straw, but not all his fault, just like our 4-12 season. If you honselty thing the 4 were from the team and the 12 was from Jason Campbell, then there's no point even reading your responses anymore.

[SFREDSKIN]

Originally Posted by Trample the Elderly

I've been fornicating and trying to forget the misery of last season.

You hanging out with Tiger Woods and Jesse James?

[Beneil (diehard since 87)]

NFL - Head to Head Stats

This compares jason to Donovan last year... as well as the guy we luckily missed trying to replace him and a guy one of the IDIOTS on this site think we should have gotten in stead of McNabb.

When comparing these stats, keep in mind, after Portis was hurt, each of these guys had better o-lines, HBs, and arguably better WRs... and definatly better coaches

[SmootSmack]

Originally Posted by Beneil (diehard since 87)

NFL - Head to Head Stats

This compares jason to Donovan last year... as well as the guy we luckily missed trying to replace him and a guy one of the IDIOTS on this site think we should have gotten in stead of McNabb.

When comparing these stats, keep in mind, after Portis was hurt, each of these guys had better o-lines, HBs, and arguably better WRs... and definatly better coaches

Don't go around calling people here IDIOTS

[tryfuhl]

Originally Posted by Beneil (diehard since 87)

NFL - Head to Head Stats

This compares jason to Donovan last year... as well as the guy we luckily missed trying to replace him and a guy one of the IDIOTS on this site think we should have gotten in stead of McNabb.

When comparing these stats, keep in mind, after Portis was hurt, each of these guys had better o-lines, HBs, and arguably better WRs... and definatly better coaches

Yeah how many times are you going to post this?

Your namecalling is mature, perhaps you should run your own analyst site.

[CRedskinsRule]

sort of startling to me. DM completions for 1st down 148 rushing 1st downs 12, JC completions for 1st down 186 rushing first downs 17.

both those surprised me.

[Beneil (diehard since 87)]

Originally Posted by CRedskinsRule

sort of startling to me. DM completions for 1st down 148, JC completions for 1st down 186

Crazy huh. These idio- i mean... boo boo heads just don't know what tye're losing if JC goes. It's gonna be like Brad Johnson all over again. People talked about him like he was nothing, we let him go, then we watched from the sidelines as he won a superbowl.

Hey, did you take in account the 1st downs he ran for? He was forced to be a one man show. Did he win them all? No. But you can't blame him for the L's Too many knucklheads do... way too many

[CRedskinsRule]

Originally Posted by Beneil (diehard since 87)

Crazy huh. These idio- i mean... boo boo heads just don't know what tye're losing if JC goes. It's gonna be like Brad Johnson all over again. People talked about him like he was nothing, we let him go, then we watched from the sidelines as he won a superbowl.

Hey, did you take in account the 1st downs he ran for? He was forced to be a one man show. Did he win them all? No. But you can't blame him for the L's Too many knucklheads do... way too many

I edited and added the rushing first downs.

[Mechanix544]

Originally Posted by Beneil (diehard since 87)

Crazy huh. These idio- i mean... boo boo heads just don't know what tye're losing if JC goes. It's gonna be like Brad Johnson all over again. People talked about him like he was nothing, we let him go, then we watched from the sidelines as he won a superbowl.

Hey, did you take in account the 1st downs he ran for? He was forced to be a one man show. Did he win them all? No. But you can't blame him for the L's Too many knucklheads do... way too many

Ya, I am so worried about how our squad is going to replace the stellar leadership and intensity that was J.Capbell.
It will suck when we trade his defense dissecting vision and guts to the raiders and they win the super bowl.
(Dontcha know They have a receiver that runs a 4.3 40yd dash.)