![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,323
|
Re: Redskins at Bears Post Game Thoughts
Quote:
Of course if they extended some drives etc Griffin would have more pass attempts. But, lets be truthful its preseason not an actual game no one is worried about scheme and pass-run ratio. The Bills only ran the ball once in the 2st half because obviously they were working on different passing concepts. That's what pre-season is for to work on stuff. Tandler's post avoids the most obvious facts: the surest way to get Griffin more pass attempts? Play him more snaps and in those snaps call more passes. Like the Dolphins are doing with Tannehill, like the Colts are doing with Luck etc. The jab at the end can't really be a jab because its a correct observation by the fans. If your QB is Rex Grossman(turnover machine)/John Beck and the WRs corps lacks talent in the eyes of the coaches (hence Garcon,Morgan out Gaffney) how is a 60-40 pass-run ratio the same ratio of elite passing offenses justified? I hate it when sports media pisses on my leg then tells me its raining. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
\m/
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 52
Posts: 99,851
|
Re: Redskins at Bears Post Game Thoughts
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,323
|
Re: Redskins at Bears Post Game Thoughts
Quote:
Maybe, just maybe some fans are making actual objective football observations and seek a discussion of them? Fan:Griffin only has 14 attempts other QBs have more Response:Oh man, why are you saying the sky is falling? Quit being a chicken little. ^^Rinse, wash, repeat. Maybe Griffin is so lights out in the closed practice sessions that the feel he doesn't need any more passing attempts then he's received? Who knows? But its a fact worth discussing and not dismissing. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
\m/
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 52
Posts: 99,851
|
Re: Redskins at Bears Post Game Thoughts
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | ||
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,323
|
Re: Redskins at Bears Post Game Thoughts
Quote:
but if this isn't dismissive then maybe I don't understand the word: Quote:
(2) Duh? Tandler's explanation is patently obvious, which is dismissive in and of itself. Of course if the first team offense could move the ball there would be more passing attempts. (3) And yes based on the personnel Kyle was too pass happy with his playcalling. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
\m/
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 52
Posts: 99,851
|
Re: Redskins at Bears Post Game Thoughts
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,323
|
Re: Redskins at Bears Post Game Thoughts
Not my intention at all, I just strongly disagree with his explanation.
And after this I'll leave it; don't mean to side track the thread for which I apologize. But directly to Tandler's statement about pass-run ratio here is Joe Philbin (who like I mentioned takes an approach that most teams take in regards to getting there QB especially non-veteran QB ready): Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Gamebreaker
![]() Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 13,030
|
Re: Redskins at Bears Post Game Thoughts
Also to note though exciting to see Banks run one back he snuffed out a chance for RGIII to a) have more attempts and b) run the two minute drill. In theory I guess they could have started RGIII at the start of the 3rd but what is the point his night was over. Saturday is his big test against a weak defense and at home; he should be able to shine.
__________________
When life gives you paper jams, turn them into paper footballs! |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|