![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
| View Poll Results: Do you approve of the Redskins' trade up to #2? | |||
| Yes |
|
193 | 91.47% |
| No |
|
18 | 8.53% |
| Voters: 211. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,378
|
Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft
Three first rounders? I dunno about that.
__________________
R.I.P. #21 |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,525
|
Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,378
|
Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft
Quote:
2012 2013 2014
__________________
R.I.P. #21 |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,525
|
Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 37
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft
It's an overpay, but I don't think the Redskins were anticipating losing the Peyton Manning leverage prior to the start of free agency. Manning did them no favors.
If it's JUST three first rounders, that's actually a pretty decent deal because you're not giving up much present value: the equivalent of a 1, 2, and a 3, which would have been reasonable under the trade value chart. But chances are we're probably throwing a 3 and a 5 as well, in which case, the Rams are probably keeping us in the position tonight.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|
|
![]() |
|
|