![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Warpath Hall of Fame
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: UNITED STATES
Age: 38
Posts: 36,194
|
Re: Was Jamie Dukes out of line on Ryan Mallett?
So is Tony romo elite? He puts up the same numbers as Rodgers basically. Is rivers elite? I mean 6 QBs aren't elite my man come on
__________________
“Mediocre people don’t like high achievers, and high achievers don’t like mediocre people.” ― Nick Saban |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Warpath Hall of Fame
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: UNITED STATES
Age: 38
Posts: 36,194
|
Re: Was Jamie Dukes out of line on Ryan Mallett?
And how would that get me fired? Garrard and JC are equal my Man, both are avg QBs. No arguing that
__________________
“Mediocre people don’t like high achievers, and high achievers don’t like mediocre people.” ― Nick Saban |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
You did WHAT?!?
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: In The Kitchen With Dyna.
Age: 36
Posts: 14,185
|
Re: Was Jamie Dukes out of line on Ryan Mallett?
Yes there is, I'll take Garrard over JC any day.
__________________
https://open.spotify.com/artist/1NG9zNxqMP8cYNP72QqUQT Shameless self-promotion. It is what it is. |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Warpath Hall of Fame
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: UNITED STATES
Age: 38
Posts: 36,194
|
Re: Was Jamie Dukes out of line on Ryan Mallett?
Alright we will end it at that lol good stuff though it's funny how ryan Mallett turned into every QB in the league. Good stuff my man and Rodgers is damn close I'll give u that. HTTR
__________________
“Mediocre people don’t like high achievers, and high achievers don’t like mediocre people.” ― Nick Saban |
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
You did WHAT?!?
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: In The Kitchen With Dyna.
Age: 36
Posts: 14,185
|
Re: Was Jamie Dukes out of line on Ryan Mallett?
Quote:
Rivers getting there Brees Brady Manning Rodgers 4 elite QBs IDK where you got 6
__________________
https://open.spotify.com/artist/1NG9zNxqMP8cYNP72QqUQT Shameless self-promotion. It is what it is. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|