![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
| View Poll Results: Who do you blame for the CBA mess? | |||
| Owners |
|
24 | 26.67% |
| Players |
|
24 | 26.67% |
| Both |
|
42 | 46.67% |
| Voters: 90. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#11 |
|
Naega jeil jal naga
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, Georgia From: Silver Spring, Maryland
Age: 40
Posts: 14,750
|
Re: Ongoing CBA discussions
Here are the details of today's "resolution":
1. Deny the Injunction (Keep the lockout in place) This would be put the NFL in the driver's seat for negotiation/settlement discussions...Simply, the lockout would continue: there will be no signings, no trades, no player workouts or rehabilitation at the facility, no contact between teams and players or agents. Nothing. 2. Grant the Injunction (Lift the lockout) This is the result football fans want, although it is not as ideal as it sounds...The NFL will appeal this result to the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals. The question then becomes whether the NFL will resume business during appeal or whether the injunction is stayed (held), meaning more of the lockout. Judge Nelson has great discretion here. She can grant the injunction and order it be enforced immediately - meaning the NFL must lift the lockout - regardless of appeal. Or she could stay the injunction (maintain the lockout) while the NFL appeals. 3. Back to the NLRB Parallel to this entire courtroom drama has been the track the NFL pursuing an unfair labor practice charge in front of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB). So, in short, there's 0.00000001% chance there will be free agency before the draft and more likely
__________________
"It's nice to be important, but its more important to be nice." - Scooter "I feel like Dirtbag has been slowly and methodically trolling the board for a month or so now." - FRPLG |
|
|
|
|