Raiders get Richard Seymour?

Dirtbag59 · 09-07-2009, 01:06 PM

It seems a lot of people think this is a stupid trade and on that I agree. However I don't think the problem is the actual amount of talent they got in exchange for their 1st round pick (8 sacks from a 3-4 DE spot is something else).

What I don't like is the fact that Richard Seymour is a winner with one year left on his contract playing in Oakland. Chances are that he's not going to want to play for them past 2009. I guess Oakland could franchise him but other then that I can't see why Seymour would stay in Oakland after this year.

09-07-2009, 01:06 PM	#22
Dirtbag59 Naega jeil jal naga Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Atlanta, Georgia From: Silver Spring, Maryland Age: 40 Posts: 14,750	Re: Raiders get Richard Seymour? It seems a lot of people think this is a stupid trade and on that I agree. However I don't think the problem is the actual amount of talent they got in exchange for their 1st round pick (8 sacks from a 3-4 DE spot is something else). What I don't like is the fact that Richard Seymour is a winner with one year left on his contract playing in Oakland. Chances are that he's not going to want to play for them past 2009. I guess Oakland could franchise him but other then that I can't see why Seymour would stay in Oakland after this year. __________________ "It's nice to be important, but its more important to be nice." - Scooter "I feel like Dirtbag has been slowly and methodically trolling the board for a month or so now." - FRPLG

Raiders get Richard Seymour?

Locker Room Main Forum