|
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
07-08-2009, 04:22 PM
|
#1 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,463
|
Re: Faulk's top 5 TE'S NO COOLEY!!!!!
People around here need to stop looking at everything through their burgundy and gold glasses. Daniels doesn't get a lot of press but he's every bit as good as Cooley is. He doesn't make the Pro Bowl cause he's got Gates and Gonzalez in the AFC. If Cooley were in the AFC he would never get picked over those two.
|
|
|
|
07-08-2009, 04:28 PM
|
#2 | |
|
Fire Bruce NOW
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Hattiesburg, MS
Posts: 11,434
|
Re: Faulk's top 5 TE'S NO COOLEY!!!!!
Quote:
__________________
Bruce Allen when in charge alone: 4-12 (.250) Bruce Allen's overall Redskins record : 28-52 (.350) Vinny Cerrato's record when in charge alone: 52-65 (.444) Vinny's overall Redskins record: 62-82 (.430) We won more with Vinny |
|
|
|
|
|
07-08-2009, 04:29 PM
|
#3 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,463
|
Re: Faulk's top 5 TE'S NO COOLEY!!!!!
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
07-08-2009, 06:12 PM
|
#4 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 37
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Faulk's top 5 TE'S NO COOLEY!!!!!
Quote:
Cooley is a better blocker than really everyone gives him credit for. Two years ago, I called him the best TE in the league, based on receiving acumen and clearly improving blocking acumen. He hasn't had a receiving season quite like 2006 though, and frankly, hasn't been as valuable under Campbell as he was under Brunell. Therefore, probably not the best TE in football, and never was, though he certainly seemed like he was going to be for awhile.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hybrid Mode
