![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Davidsonville
Posts: 1,783
|
Re: Gibbs' take on Campbell's situation
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,453
|
Re: Gibbs' take on Campbell's situation
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,378
|
Re: Gibbs' take on Campbell's situation
Quote:
Also, did you notice that all the teams that you mentioned (Miami, San Diego, Tenn, and New Orleans) were in the top 10 of least sacks allowed in 2009?
__________________
R.I.P. #21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 37
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Gibbs' take on Campbell's situation
Quote:
The Browns and Seahawks were probably worse at WR than we were last year, and you can probably throw the Raiders, Rams, Bears, and Vikings in there as well. But you know what, none of those teams had any semblence of a passing game last year. So, it's not proven that an offense can function at a higher level than ours last year without a better job on the outside. We'll see. The OL should improve, but the WRs must develop because the veterans aren't likely to be more healthy than they were last year.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,453
|
Re: Gibbs' take on Campbell's situation
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 37
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Gibbs' take on Campbell's situation
Do you want me to qualify this, or can I just leave it as an implied yes (without being taken out of context)?
EDIT ^^Probably reads as more smart alecky than intended. I was trying to ask if the sentence in the context above can stand for itself, or if you really want hard numbers that suggest our passing game was clearly better than Clevelands or Seattles.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. Last edited by GTripp0012; 06-29-2009 at 05:09 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,453
|
Re: Gibbs' take on Campbell's situation
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 37
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Gibbs' take on Campbell's situation
Quote:
The key, obviously, is going to be in the big plays. Even when Moss is well covered, we're going to ask Kelly and Thomas to win those one on ones, and the rest should go from there. Those double moves that we like require great pass protection, and there's no guarentee that we can get that, but those vertical routes by secondary wide receivers can be run at any time...if only we get the personnel to run them.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|