![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#31 |
|
Another Year, another mess.
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,581
|
Re: Peter King Expects Jason Campbell to be 26th Most Productive 2007 QB
his ideas are not based on anything other than who he likes to watch. King should have named his article "my favorite qb's in the NFL".
__________________
That got ugly fast |
|
|
|
| Advertisements |
|
|
#32 |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Dumfries, VA
Age: 72
Posts: 241
|
Re: Peter King Expects Jason Campbell to be 26th Most Productive 2007 QB
The only person who can prove Mr. King wrong is Jason Campbell. I hope JC proves Mr. King to be an ill-informed writer rather than a predictive genius.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#33 | |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,575
|
Re: Peter King Expects Jason Campbell to be 26th Most Productive 2007 QB
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#34 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: chesapeake, va
Age: 61
Posts: 15,817
|
Re: Peter King Expects Jason Campbell to be 26th Most Productive 2007 QB
Not sure why its such a surprise where JC is ranked base on how he ranked the QB's and if you read how he ranked them it makes sense. He even kind of joked on where Kitna was in his raking but explained it was based on how he was ranking them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#35 | |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 2,836
|
Re: Peter King Expects Jason Campbell to be 26th Most Productive 2007 QB
Quote:
As for the Kitna ranking, if I said the Earth was flat and then made a joke about having said it, it wouldn't make it any less of an ass-stupid comment. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#36 |
|
MVP
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: lancaster,pa
Age: 63
Posts: 10,672
|
Re: Peter King Expects Jason Campbell to be 26th Most Productive 2007 QB
then we will have to disagree. the only 2 quarterbacks on the list that deserve to be ranked higher are Manning and Brady. you would seriously take Marc Bulger over Mcnabb?
__________________
"It's better to be quiet and thought a fool than to open ones mouth and remove all doubt." courtesy of 53fan |
|
|
|
|
|
#37 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 37
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Peter King Expects Jason Campbell to be 26th Most Productive 2007 QB
Whatever. King is just throwing his opinion out there. Some points he makes will actaully be right (Donovan won't be as hot as he was in 2006 again), Others (such as Romo and Young being more productive than McNabb) will be wrong. That's not a big deal.
Speaking of opinions, heres how I would have done it: 1. Peyton Manning 2. Everyone else With everyone else listed in this order: 2. Marc Bulger 3. Phillip Rivers 4. Matt Leinart 5. Tom Brady 6. Carson Palmer 7. Matt Hasselbeck 8. Matt Schaub 9. Ben Roethlisberger 10. Drew Brees 11. Donovan McNabb 12. Jason Campbell 13. Byron Leftwich 14. Jay Cutler 15. Vince Young 16. Eli Manning 17. Chad Pennington 18. Steve McNair 19. Jon Kitna 20. Jeff Garcia 21. Trent Green 22. Alex Smith 23. Rex Grossman 24. Tony Romo 25. Jake Delhomme 26. Brett Favre 27. Michael Vick 28. Josh McCown 29. Brodie Croyle 30. Charlie Frye 31. JP Losman 32. Tavaris Jackson |
|
|
|
|
|
#38 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 37
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Peter King Expects Jason Campbell to be 26th Most Productive 2007 QB
Quote:
I'd put my money on Bulger getting NFL MVP this year assuming my predicition that the Rams run off 11+ wins in the regular season comes true. McNabb's good (obviously), but his entire career suggests that his first 6 games of last season were a mirage, and that he got injured before his numbers could be pulled back down to earth. I'd expect him to have another good season again this year, but top 3 is borderline ridiculous. But then again, you know what they say about opinions. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#39 |
|
\m/
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 52
Posts: 99,849
|
Re: Peter King Expects Jason Campbell to be 26th Most Productive 2007 QB
McNabb put up HUGE numbers in 2004, so I'm not sure why anyone would consider what he did last year until he got injured a "mirage".
In fact if you look at his last two injury plagued seasons, if you project those numbers out over a full season his numbers would be pretty much right in line with his 2004 season. |
|
|
|
|
|
#40 | |
|
You did WHAT?!?
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: In The Kitchen With Dyna.
Age: 36
Posts: 14,185
|
Re: Peter King Expects Jason Campbell to be 26th Most Productive 2007 QB
Quote:
I was with you up until number 2
__________________
https://open.spotify.com/artist/1NG9zNxqMP8cYNP72QqUQT Shameless self-promotion. It is what it is. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#41 | |
|
You did WHAT?!?
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: In The Kitchen With Dyna.
Age: 36
Posts: 14,185
|
Re: Peter King Expects Jason Campbell to be 26th Most Productive 2007 QB
Quote:
I predict the Rams will win 8 at the most.
__________________
https://open.spotify.com/artist/1NG9zNxqMP8cYNP72QqUQT Shameless self-promotion. It is what it is. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#42 | |
|
\m/
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 52
Posts: 99,849
|
Re: Peter King Expects Jason Campbell to be 26th Most Productive 2007 QB
Quote:
Rivers at #3? Leinart at #4? Brees at #10? Schaub at #8? I must say one thing, at least you're consistent in your "unique" views around here. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#43 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,453
|
Re: Peter King Expects Jason Campbell to be 26th Most Productive 2007 QB
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#44 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,453
|
Re: Peter King Expects Jason Campbell to be 26th Most Productive 2007 QB
Quote:
Also how in the world do you have Schaub ahead of McNabb and Brees? That's nuts! McNabb and Brees are MVP type of players. Brees could have easily won the MVP last year. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#45 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 37
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Peter King Expects Jason Campbell to be 26th Most Productive 2007 QB
Quote:
McNabb, Palmer, Brees, and Brady are and will always be successful quarterbacks, but the idea is to pick the guys who are the best in their field for this year. And Rivers, Leinart and Schaub definately fit the criteria. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|