Is Cooley Still Considered an H-Back? - Commanders Post at The Warpath

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop

Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Is Cooley Still Considered an H-Back?

User Name Remember Me?

Password

Register Forum Rules FAQ Calendar

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion

Go to Page...

Is Cooley Still Considered an H-Back?

Locker Room Main Forum

Thread Tools Display Modes

05-30-2007, 01:52 PM	#7
Sheriff Gonna Getcha Franchise Player Join Date: Feb 2004 Age: 46 Posts: 8,317	Re: Is Cooley Still Considered an H-Back? Yeah, I too read that Saunders doesn't use an H-back. But what really differentiates a TE from a H-Back? I could swear I saw Chris Cooley lined up in the backfield on a few occasions last season and then either lead-block for an RB or go run a route. Maybe he is used as a H-back on a few plays, but is primarily lined up off-tackle as a TE?

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is Off Forum Rules

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:43 AM.

We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.