![]() |
|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
View Poll Results: Grade the trade for Deebo Samuel | |||
A |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
7 | 29.17% |
B |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
13 | 54.17% |
C |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
4 | 16.67% |
D |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
0 | 0% |
F |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
0 | 0% |
Voters: 24. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: UK
Age: 59
Posts: 2,646
|
Re: Washington trades for Deebo Samuel
I'd say the pro's outweigh the con's. He's only 29, potentially years left in him and likely a 2-3 year deal anyway. An extension would mitigate his 2025 cap numbers and he wants a SB opportunity like any other player, so should be willing to do a deal. He offers something we don't really have, an every down air and ground threat and takes the pressure of Scary. If he wasn't of the right temperament AP and DQ wouldn't have wanted him so...
Con's are he's not been as productive last couple of seasons and been out 4 games, but every likelihood he was playing hurt, so a full offseason of recovery (like Lattimore) and hopefully he's back to his best. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
From a Land Down Under
![]() Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: toms river, nj
Age: 54
Posts: 24,146
|
Re: Washington trades for Deebo Samuel
Quote:
Hate to keep beating a dead horse, but he had one of his most promising years season before last. Last year the whole team sucked including his quarterback. 4 games over two years is pretty damn good. Wouldn’t call that a con. I see no cons. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|