Come up with a new name for the Redskins

[CRedskinsRule]

Weird thing about the Arkansas State v Chattanooga red wolves case, the articles all said a trial would occur this past October but I can not find any articles at all about the results.

Just saying a hypothetical here but suppose Washington stepped in and asked Arkansas to postpone or settle but to do so with a privacy clause until Washington announces the deal after the season.

If you are looking for a stealth bomber you look for the absence of reflections where some should be. There should be a public resolution to the Ark. v Chattanooga case especially since Chattanooga continues to use and market the Red Wolves name and logo

Sent from my SM-G781U using Tapatalk

[CRedskinsRule]

Originally Posted by CRedskinsRule

Weird thing about the Arkansas State v Chattanooga red wolves case, the articles all said a trial would occur this past October but I can not find any articles at all about the results.

Just saying a hypothetical here but suppose Washington stepped in and asked Arkansas to postpone or settle but to do so with a privacy clause until Washington announces the deal after the season.

If you are looking for a stealth bomber you look for the absence of reflections where some should be. There should be a public resolution to the Ark. v Chattanooga case especially since Chattanooga continues to use and market the Red Wolves name and logo

Sent from my SM-G781U using Tapatalk

So New Years eve and I am on the couch googling this stuff. Turns out that Chattanooga and Arkansas agreed to a temporary suspension of the proceedings to allow time for them to reach a settlement. The clock for their filing started again in late November with a lot of time to resolve it.

Sent from my SM-G781U using Tapatalk

[FrenchSkin]

Originally Posted by CRedskinsRule

Weird thing about the Arkansas State v Chattanooga red wolves case, the articles all said a trial would occur this past October but I can not find any articles at all about the results.

Just saying a hypothetical here but suppose Washington stepped in and asked Arkansas to postpone or settle but to do so with a privacy clause until Washington announces the deal after the season.

If you are looking for a stealth bomber you look for the absence of reflections where some should be. There should be a public resolution to the Ark. v Chattanooga case especially since Chattanooga continues to use and market the Red Wolves name and logo

Sent from my SM-G781U using Tapatalk

Speculation but decent reasoning IMO.
I was wondering the exact same thing and didn't think any further than "Well Arkansas and Chattanooga must have made a deal before the trial"... Didn't think of why it hadn't been made public.
Maybe we're overthinking, but you might be on something there.

EDIT: Saw your second post. Still could be related though.