The Buttery Males Thread

[skinsfan69]

Originally Posted by BaltimoreSkins

Have to disagree here. The reports definitely show an unwillingness to participate but fearful of repercussions. I also am not sure what having a female director has anything to do with the scenario anyways.

But what were the repercussions? Loss of a salary? That wasn't it. At the end of the day you are a cheerleader, an unpaid position.

If someone puts a crack pipe in front of you and tells you to smoke it are you going to do it?

[Ruhskins]

Originally Posted by skinsfan69

But what were the repercussions? Loss of a salary? That wasn't it. At the end of the day you are a cheerleader, an unpaid position.

If someone puts a crack pipe in front of you and tells you to smoke it are you going to do it?

Dude, no offense but why are you so hell bent on this? Bunch of cheerleaders were harassed and threatened by this organization. What's the benefit to you as a person to disregard and discount what they went through?

Women put up with a lot of shit, and aren't always in a position to say no. This is an organization that has fired people for sexually harassing women, I'd give them the benefit of the doubt.

[MTK]

Originally Posted by Ruhskins

Dude, no offense but why are you so hell bent on this? Bunch of cheerleaders were harassed and threatened by this organization. What's the benefit to you as a person to disregard and discount what they went through?

Women put up with a lot of shit, and aren't always in a position to say no. This is an organization that has fired people for sexually harassing women, I'd give them the benefit of the doubt.

End of story.

[skinsfan69]

Originally Posted by Ruhskins

Dude, no offense but why are you so hell bent on this? Bunch of cheerleaders were harassed and threatened by this organization. What's the benefit to you as a person to disregard and discount what they went through?

Women put up with a lot of shit, and aren't always in a position to say no. This is an organization that has fired people for sexually harassing women, I'd give them the benefit of the doubt.

I am not discounting it. As I said it is pretty low. My point is these women didn't act like responsible adults by choosing to take off their shirts. .

[mredskins]

Originally Posted by skinsfan69

I am not discounting it. As I said it is pretty low. My point is these women didn't act like responsible adults by choosing to take off their shirts. .

That is borderline saying " she wore a short skirt she deserved to be rape"

Do you not think people do things because they are chorused or threaten to do the act.

[punch it in]

Originally Posted by skinsfan69

I am not discounting it. As I said it is pretty low. My point is these women didn't act like responsible adults by choosing to take off their shirts. .

Nevermind i think everyone else made the point here…

[Giantone]

Originally Posted by skinsfan69

I am not discounting it. As I said it is pretty low. My point is these women didn't act like responsible adults by choosing to take off their shirts. .

https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/...nt-lewd-videos

Washington Football Team, former cheerleaders reach settlement over lewd videos


The Washington Football Team reached a settlement with its former cheerleaders, who appeared in lewd videos made without their knowledge during swimsuit calendar photo shoots in 2008 and 2010.

Attorneys for both sides confirmed the settlement, which, one source said, was actually reached in 2020, though they declined to say exactly when. The terms of the settlement were not disclosed. The Washington Post first reported news of the settlement. There was no lawsuit filed.

There were two videos made from outtakes during those years in which some private parts were exposed. Certain props were used to shield those body parts and at times those props were insufficient.

The Washington Post detailed those shoots in August, with one former employee, Brad Baker, saying staffers were told to produce a video of this for owner Dan Snyder, who has denied that allegation. Baker worked in the franchise's broadcast department from 2007 to '09. The Post reported two other sources saying a similar video was produced at the behest of the team's former vice president and play-by-play announcer Larry Michael. He, too, has denied the allegation.

[mredskins]

Originally Posted by Giantone

https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/...nt-lewd-videos

Washington Football Team, former cheerleaders reach settlement over lewd videos


The Washington Football Team reached a settlement with its former cheerleaders, who appeared in lewd videos made without their knowledge during swimsuit calendar photo shoots in 2008 and 2010.

Attorneys for both sides confirmed the settlement, which, one source said, was actually reached in 2020, though they declined to say exactly when. The terms of the settlement were not disclosed. The Washington Post first reported news of the settlement. There was no lawsuit filed.

There were two videos made from outtakes during those years in which some private parts were exposed. Certain props were used to shield those body parts and at times those props were insufficient.

The Washington Post detailed those shoots in August, with one former employee, Brad Baker, saying staffers were told to produce a video of this for owner Dan Snyder, who has denied that allegation. Baker worked in the franchise's broadcast department from 2007 to '09. The Post reported two other sources saying a similar video was produced at the behest of the team's former vice president and play-by-play announcer Larry Michael. He, too, has denied the allegation.

Not to make a joke, but I could see Dan holding up a blade grass to sheiks the private parts but they started with palm branches and just worked down in size as the shot went on.

[punch it in]

Originally Posted by Giantone

https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/...nt-lewd-videos


The Washington Football Team reached a settlement with its former cheerleaders, who appeared in lewd videos made without their knowledge during swimsuit calendar photo shoots in 2008 and 2010.

All ya really need to know.
They are not in any way complicit nor were they acting inappropriate.

[SunnySide]

Originally Posted by skinsfan69

But what were the repercussions? Loss of a salary? That wasn't it. At the end of the day you are a cheerleader, an unpaid position.

If someone puts a crack pipe in front of you and tells you to smoke it are you going to do it?

The old days of old men exerting their standing and undue influence on young ladies in the workplace is over.

Young interns dont need to "stay silent" when an older boss gets creepy.

Those days are over.

The Jon Gruden and Bruce Allens of the world are being phased out.