![]() |
|
Debating with the enemy Discuss politics, current events, and other hot button issues here. |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Aug 2008
Age: 58
Posts: 21,701
|
Re: Supreme Court vacancy
Quote:
Would it be a bad thing for SC justices to be held up until after the next national election. (This is reacting to your point that going forward no confirmation will happen when the senate and peesident are of different parties). Especially when the country is as divided as it is. If that means that the court spends a term as an 8 judge panel so be it. I don't want to see SC justices elected on a ballot, but this is almost like you are creating republic style justice nominations instead of lifetime appointment by the ruling class. Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Hug Anne Spyder
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 20,577
|
Re: Supreme Court vacancy
Quote:
Your party will say or do anything to advance the party agenda. It's the latest example of putting the party over the public interest. This time it's unforgiveable though.
__________________
Hail to the Football Team |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Aug 2008
Age: 58
Posts: 21,701
|
Re: Supreme Court vacancy
Quote:
Ultimately our system is seriously broken Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|