Media Bias

[Chico23231]

Originally Posted by mooby

This is a problem Chico, this isn't fake news. But you want to tell us what we're going to say before we say it.

How about "reporter lies, reporter loses job." Keeps the politics out of it, and reports the facts. I guarantee if you posted it that way G1 and Punch wouldn't have a problem with it. As it is now you just call it fake news because you want to incite a reaction.

The problem is he reported fake news to create a false narrative...or the narrative he wanted. Then he resign because he guessed wrong.

Media is dividing the nation for profit and to smear a president who they politically don’t agree with. When you do your job based on these premises then your ethically corrupt.

[Giantone]

Originally Posted by Chico23231

The problem is he reported fake news to create a false narrative...or the narrative he wanted. Then he resign because he guessed wrong.

Media is dividing the nation for profit and to smear a president who they politically don’t agree with. When you do your job based on these premises then your ethically corrupt.

..........have ya looked at your president lately???

[mooby]

Originally Posted by Chico23231

The problem is he reported fake news to create a false narrative...or the narrative he wanted. Then he resign because he guessed wrong.

Media is dividing the nation for profit and to smear a president who they politically don’t agree with. When you do your job based on these premises then your ethically corrupt.

The problem is you juxtaposed a corrupt individual to represent an entire industry as a whole. I agree most major news agencies have agendas nowadays. But you're lying to yourself if you think there aren't 10 reporters who are pissed off at this hack because their credibility is going to take a hit for working in the same industry as him.

I got one more question for you. When you say "Media is dividing the nation for profit and to smear a president who they politically don't agree with" do you include Fox News in that group?

[CRedskinsRule]

Originally Posted by mooby

The problem is you juxtaposed a corrupt individual to represent an entire industry as a whole. I agree most major news agencies have agendas nowadays. But you're lying to yourself if you think there aren't 10 reporters who are pissed off at this hack because their credibility is going to take a hit for working in the same industry as him.

I got one more question for you. When you say "Media is dividing the nation for profit and to smear a president who they politically don't agree with" do you include Fox News in that group?

I do include foxnews in it.

[Chico23231]

Originally Posted by mooby

The problem is you juxtaposed a corrupt individual to represent an entire industry as a whole. I agree most major news agencies have agendas nowadays. But you're lying to yourself if you think there aren't 10 reporters who are pissed off at this hack because their credibility is going to take a hit for working in the same industry as him.

I got one more question for you. When you say "Media is dividing the nation for profit and to smear a president who they politically don't agree with" do you include Fox News in that group?

yes, Faux news...I don't watch it because its biased. BUT I understand why people do....its because the mainstream media are biased, so if your a conservative you go there for news. What would you expect??? Ratings are high.

I don't watch it....And I don't know why people would watch MSNBC or CNN...why would you get your news from a bias/slanted opinion? If you do, I hope at least you watch with an open mind, knowing the false assertions and opinions are likely biased and without proper context...and headlines are sensationalized to divide and reinforce narratives that are made up.

[CRedskinsRule]

Originally Posted by Chico23231

yes, Faux news...I don't watch it because its biased. BUT I understand why people do....its because the mainstream media are biased, so if your a conservative you go there for news. What would you expect??? Ratings are high.

I don't watch it....And I don't know why people would watch MSNBC or CNN...why would you get your news from a bias/slanted opinion? If you do, I hope at least you watch with an open mind, knowing the false assertions and opinions are likely biased and without proper context...and headlines are sensationalized to divide and reinforce narratives that are made up.

Personally, I like feeling bipolar so i watch Rachel Maddow and Hannity at the same time.

[Giantone]

I like it when the cult cries about the media but doesn't say what "media" they use to verify their own information ?

[Giantone]

Originally Posted by CRedskinsRule

Personally, I like feeling bipolar so i watch Rachel Maddow and Hannity at the same time.

LOL, great example of the cult not understanding the difference between News and OPINION................both of them are Opinion shows not "NEWS PROGRAMS".

[mooby]

Originally Posted by Giantone

LOL, great example of the cult not understanding the difference between News and OPINION................both of them are Opinion shows not "NEWS PROGRAMS".

This. What difference is there between an opinion article posted on MSN and a talking head discussing their opinion on a Fox News show? None.

[CRedskinsRule]

Originally Posted by mooby

This. What difference is there between an opinion article posted on MSN and a talking head discussing their opinion on a Fox News show? None.

I understand they are both opinions, and looking at the post I replied to I can see why it looks like I was referring to them as news, that was not my intent. I simply was making a light hearted joke, hence the reference to my special brownies

Edit: maybe I WAS having brownies, cuz my post actually doesn't have the brownies comment. That was in the SC thread. Nonetheless the bipolar comment was meant light heartedly.

[Chico23231]

Originally Posted by Giantone

LOL, great example of the cult not understanding the difference between News and OPINION................both of them are Opinion shows not "NEWS PROGRAMS".

I’ve notice a sad trend among CNN fake news media lately. Cnn has been called out for the fact they stop reporting actual news and now are just mainly biased opinion pieces....many of the opinions are flat out wrong or don’t give proper context or facts about whatever they are reporting.

So I’ve notice they changed the labeling of “opinion” articles to the label “analysis” as a way to legitimize biased opinion...which still continues to do the same thing...either mischaracterize strategy, conveniently leave out facts, leave out context, leave of historical context, etc.

It’s fake analysis....instead of poor opinion

Remember to keep your eyes open when you read it folks