Redskins Offseason Thread

[calia]

I answered my own question -- we get nothing for Breeland because he wasn't signed by anyone as of May 8: https://www.nbcsports.com/washington...shaud-breeland

And we didn't do a tender (I wonder why) by which we could get a compensatory pick.

[FrenchSkin]

Originally Posted by calia

I answered my own question -- we get nothing for Breeland because he wasn't signed by anyone as of May 8: https://www.nbcsports.com/washington...shaud-breeland

And we didn't do a tender (I wonder why) by which we could get a compensatory pick.

I guess it means the concerns about his foot infection are serious and could linger for some while...
Sucks for him, and for us, having him back for 1M would have been one hell of a bargain, even with every body expecting 3rd round pick Moreau to step it up.

[KI Skins Fan]

Originally Posted by FrenchSkin

I guess it means the concerns about his foot infection are serious and could linger for some while...
Sucks for him, and for us, having him back for 1M would have been one hell of a bargain, even with every body expecting 3rd round pick Moreau to step it up.

I don't think they wanted him back at any price.

[FrenchSkin]

Originally Posted by KI Skins Fan

I don't think they wanted him back at any price.

They had to like him a bit, they started him outside over Fuller.
I understand not wanting to pay him 10M/y when you think you have a solution with Moreau/Dunbar, and you're already spending 15M/y on Norman, but you're telling if they knew he'd be healthy before the season starts, they wouldn't want him for 1M ?