![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |
|
JUST LIVIN
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: houston,tx
Age: 63
Posts: 4,930
|
Re: Super Bowl LII Thread
Quote:
As for Brady,I was definitely pulling for him to pull it out.Haters gonna hate.That dude probably works harder then anybody at his game,takes extreme care of his body,demands accountability from his teammates,ultimate competitor. AT 40 YEARS OLD!!! Wins MVP! I dont think he is truly appreciated for how good he is,has anybody at QB position ever come close to winning MVP at his age before? Shreds Phillys defense for over 500 yards in a Super Bowl! And he had an off game lol Dude is unbelievable
__________________
Make The Redskins Great Again |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Yokohama, Japan
Posts: 4,525
|
Re: Super Bowl LII Thread
Quote:
-On the Jesse James overturned TD, he catches the ball going to the ground, and the ball moves when it hits the ground . On replay, it's conclusive. You can't argue that the ball did not move. You can argue it didn't move much, but it did move when it hit the ground, he lost control of the ball because of the ground. Conclusive evidence = overturn the call. -On the Clement's TD, the ball never hits the ground, it's in an awkward position but you can argue about wether he had control or not. Remember you can control the ball with you butt and you ear, doesn't matter. So I agree you can say he lost control before setting 2 feet a second time, but it's not conclusive. Because you can also argue about it. So I like the fact the call stand. I just wished they were more consistent on letting call stand when nothing's conclusive.
__________________
Derz Ambassaderz in the Land of the Rising Sun. Oui Monsieur. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
\m/
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 52
Posts: 99,846
|
Re: Super Bowl LII Thread
Quote:
Consistency is key, I also wish they would emphasis that replay is to overturn obvious bad calls, not to get everything perfect. Stop reviewing every score and turnover. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Yokohama, Japan
Posts: 4,525
|
Re: Super Bowl LII Thread
Quote:
I'm not sure I agree with him. Cause sometimes it can take time to see a small thing and that'll still be conclusive. But I'd like them to stress the fact replay should be here to support the work of officials, not to question every decision they make with ever improving technology.
__________________
Derz Ambassaderz in the Land of the Rising Sun. Oui Monsieur. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,575
|
Re: Super Bowl LII Thread
I agree that replay should be to overturn obviously bad calls but this past season replay was used to get things perfect. Then suddenly in the Super Bowl it didn't have to be perfect anymore. So much for consistency.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Yokohama, Japan
Posts: 4,525
|
Re: Super Bowl LII Thread
Quote:
Between the regular season and the SB, Vince announcer the XFL, and threw massive shades at the NFL for the catch rule, then Goodell came out and said the catch rule needed to change, that he wanted fewer and shorter reviews etc... So on the biggest stage of all with everyone watching he had to back up what he said. If this becomes the norm I like it.
__________________
Derz Ambassaderz in the Land of the Rising Sun. Oui Monsieur. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|