Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Terrell Pryor Sr.

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-24-2017, 02:31 PM   #1
jamf
Pro Bowl
 
jamf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: San Diego Ca
Posts: 5,353
Re: Terrell Pryor Sr.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ruhskins View Post
For the Pierre Garcon crowd, both Kyle S. and Sean McVeigh were bidding on Garcon, which made him an expensive commodity.

I believe the team tried to get DJax, but got outbid by Tampa Bay.

I don't blame the team going after Pryor, he was a low risk/high reward sign. But his ineffectiveness, along with both Crowder and Reed not doing much, has made the matter worst.
I don't agree that he was a low risk signing. With Doctson starting on the other side, we needed production from the X WR.

They needed to overpay for Garcon, he earned it.
jamf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2017, 02:36 PM   #2
CRedskinsRule
Living Legend
 
CRedskinsRule's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Age: 58
Posts: 21,702
Re: Terrell Pryor Sr.

Quote:
Originally Posted by jamf View Post
I don't agree that he was a low risk signing. With Doctson starting on the other side, we needed production from the X WR.

They needed to overpay for Garcon, he earned it.
I think, but may be 100% wrong, that the team expected KC and his agent to negotiate from their starting offer, so they planned to save cap space by letting Garcon and DJax walk. I'm not saying KC was wrong with staying on the tag, but I think the inability for the two sides to even negotiate negatively impacted the teams financial plannings around the cap.
CRedskinsRule is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2017, 11:33 PM   #3
skinsfan69
Living Legend
 
skinsfan69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,453
Re: Terrell Pryor Sr.

Quote:
Originally Posted by jamf View Post
I don't agree that he was a low risk signing. With Doctson starting on the other side, we needed production from the X WR.

They needed to overpay for Garcon, he earned it.
You couldn't overpay Garcon with the shape the defense was in. Could not do it.
skinsfan69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:28 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 1.09922 seconds with 11 queries