![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Beaverdam Virginia
Age: 64
Posts: 2,137
|
Re: Trouble in Redskins Park?
Quote:
Pretty accurate speculation, are you trying to tell me if they never franchised Kirk and signed him before the 2016 season to a long term deal he would not have been under contract for less than $24 mil a year which is probably his current market rate? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
A Dude
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Newtown Square, PA
Age: 46
Posts: 12,458
|
Re: Trouble in Redskins Park?
You make it sound as if Cousins has to sign a contract offered to him. What makes you think he wouldn't have bet on himself? I think he's right, there's no way to know whether Cousins would have taken it.
__________________
God made certain people to play football. He was one of them. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Beaverdam Virginia
Age: 64
Posts: 2,137
|
Re: Trouble in Redskins Park?
I am sure we agree that the market and the last franchise tag sets Kirk's yearly value around $24 mil. Are you trying to tell me if someone put a 5 year $100 mil contract with $40 mil guaranteed in front of Kirk before the 2016 season and 9,000 passing yards ago he would not have signed it? Or maybe for a little higher? That would have been quite more than the rumor mill said the Redskins offered that Kirk turned down. I don't think you can argue that the Redskins gambled and lost tagging Kirk two years in a row. They would be lucky to get him for $24 mil a year now on a long term deal.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|