Fantasy Football 2013 Thread

[scowan]

Originally Posted by Kindoy

It's possible that I do start Foster & Tate at times - with 20 teams there's 40 starting RB spots and only 32 in the NFL, with Tate probably being better than a small handful of those (possibly including my other RB Mendenhall). Emphasis in this league is on the WR anyways. I agree though I'll miss Charles a ton, I just don't think I'd win this league without a TE.

Oh wow, I didn't realize you were in a 20 team league. Never mind what I said then. 20 team leagues make RBs very, very thin, so yes, starting both might be an option. I would hate to be in a 20 team league. I would think by week 7 or 8, half the guys you are playing with will have given up even making roster changes because there would be too many injuries or underperforming teams.

[Kindoy]

Originally Posted by scowan

Oh wow, I didn't realize you were in a 20 team league. Never mind what I said then. 20 team leagues make RBs very, very thin, so yes, starting both might be an option. I would hate to be in a 20 team league. I would think by week 7 or 8, half the guys you are playing with will have given up even making roster changes because there would be too many injuries or underperforming teams.

Well its a $100 each league so guys tend to stick around - winner takes something like $1600. But yes the contenders lose the pack fairly quickly, the depth aspect makes it fun. Trades, waivers, and luck are all huge. We do waivers based on a bidding system so its fair. It's a bunch of buddies from about 4 different high school classes so we have a good time with it.