Quote:
Originally Posted by saden1
|
This case is what we lawyers who do more than stay at a Holiday Inn call "easily distinguishable". Prosecutor's has forensic cell phone evidence placing the suspect at the scene, an admission of murder in the commission of a crime that was judged credible and his girlfriend ID'ing him from the tapes.
Quote:
The case against Keodara was built primarily on the testimony of a friend who had served time with him in a juvenile facility, according to court documents.
The friend told Wenatchee police he’d gotten a frantic call from Keodara on the night of the shooting, saying he’d shot a man over a drug deal and needed to get out of town, prosecutors say.
In addition, video surveillance from a nearby gas station and drugstore show a car similar to the one described by witnesses stopping at the shelter around 2:31 a.m., prosecutors say.
Keodara’s ex-girlfriend identified him from surveillance footage, and cellphone records placed him in the area at the time of the shootings, according to Carlstrom.
But Brandes said during the trial that the two cellphones taken into evidence by police weren’t registered to Keodara and that the surveillance footage wasn’t clear enough to identify Keodara.
The gun used in the shootings was never found, and the two other Asian males who were at the scene were never identified, she said.
|
Find me, in the GZ/TM evidence, a confession from GZ that he wasn't in fear of his life, survelliance video showing the fight with a witness (preferably GZ's wife for consistency with your idiotic analogy) identifying GZ as the person initiating the fight, and some independent techological forensic evidence demonstrating that, at the time he shot TM, GZ could not reasonably have been in fear for his life. Then we can talk.
Until then, stay out of Holiday Inns.