Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Gibbs hints at passing on winslow and getting taylor

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-21-2004, 09:44 AM   #1
Big C
Mr. Brightside
 
Big C's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Leesburg, VA
Age: 38
Posts: 4,453
Gibbs hints at passing on winslow and getting taylor

http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/wire?...nfl&id=1786353

says that Winslow reminds him of Desmond Howard...eases me somewhat because i really want Taylor. Didnt notice if anyone else has posted this, if so, my apologies
Big C is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 04-21-2004, 10:48 AM   #2
SmootSmack
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
Yeah I posted in the news wire, it's all good though...The Winslow reminds him of Howard talk could be a smoke screen though. We'll find out in 3 days and counting
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2004, 10:55 AM   #3
EEich
The Starter
 
EEich's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Bristol, CT
Age: 60
Posts: 1,001
I think the biggest hint that they plan to pick Taylor is the lack of action in signing Iffy. They don't want to sign him to starter money if he's going to be Taylor's backup.
EEich is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2004, 10:59 AM   #4
RedskinPete
The Starter
 
RedskinPete's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Camino,Ca
Posts: 1,174
The Redskins may not get to pick Winslow. KMBR is reporting that the Radiers are looking in to K. Warner as a QB for next year. This would give them a opening to take a OT or a TE!!! Davis has a eye on both but would love Winslow. Also some drafts have see Taylor not being there as well but that is not as likely!
RedskinPete is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2004, 11:19 AM   #5
Defensewins
Playmaker
 
Defensewins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 3,749
I would say it is more likely that Sean Taylor would be picked before our #5, rather than Winslow.
Defensewins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2004, 11:24 AM   #6
BrudLee
Playmaker
 
BrudLee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Rehoboth Beach, DE
Posts: 3,494
Quote:
Originally Posted by RedskinPete
The Redskins may not get to pick Winslow. KMBR is reporting that the Radiers are looking in to K. Warner as a QB for next year. This would give them a opening to take a OT or a TE!!! Davis has a eye on both but would love Winslow. Also some drafts have see Taylor not being there as well but that is not as likely!
Or a WR. Rice is still very good, but not a long term solution. Brown should have retired a year ago. Porter has durability questions. In two years, all three could be gone (or non-factors).
__________________
There's nowhere to go but up. Or down. I guess we could stay where we are, too.
BrudLee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2004, 11:44 AM   #7
Gmanc711
Thank You, Sean.
 
Gmanc711's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Gaithersburg, MD
Age: 39
Posts: 7,506
I wouldnt be suprised to see Oakland grab Roy Williams. I heard Al Davis Likes him alot. If Gallery is there, I could see them grabbing him as well. Of course Manning is a possiblity too. The Chargers are going to have a big impact on what Oakland does.
Gmanc711 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2004, 11:45 AM   #8
Paintrain
Pro Bowl
 
Paintrain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Age: 54
Posts: 5,006
Ok, crazy trade scenario time.. If Winslow and Taylor are available, how about offering Betts, Trotter, next years #1 and #3 to Detroit and drafting both of them! Of course it won't happen, but if some fools are throwing out trading Ramsey, Samuels and the #5 to SD for the #1 and Drew Brees I figured this wasn't any worse.
Paintrain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2004, 11:46 AM   #9
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,464
The Raiders could look to trade down too and swap spots with the Giants or maybe the Browns.
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2004, 02:17 PM   #10
skinsfanthru&thru
Playmaker
 
skinsfanthru&thru's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Richmond, VA
Age: 44
Posts: 3,813
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk72
The Raiders could look to trade down too and swap spots with the Giants or maybe the Browns.
my bet between the two would be the browns who are infatuated with gallery and thus the raiders could probably milk more picks out of them and still get roy williams at #7.
skinsfanthru&thru is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2004, 02:21 PM   #11
SKINSnCANES
Pro Bowl
 
SKINSnCANES's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: New Jersey
Age: 42
Posts: 5,454
dont be surprised if the Raiders draft Gallery, they might want him for themselves. Al Davis is in love with Roy Williams though, probably enough in love that he wont want to trade down and risk not having him. Gallery could then easily fall to four, the Cards want Larry over anyone. At which point the Giants have to decide if they want a franchise QB. If Gallery falls to five them everything goes out the window. The Skins better trade with the Browns if Gallery is at 5, then we just pick whoever the Lions dont. And mabye get a second in the process.
__________________
"I'm used to winning, coming from the University of Miami. " Clinton Portis
SKINSnCANES is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2004, 02:22 PM   #12
offiss
Registered User
 
offiss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: sparta, new jersey [ northern jersey ]
Age: 60
Posts: 3,097
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paintrain
Ok, crazy trade scenario time.. If Winslow and Taylor are available, how about offering Betts, Trotter, next years #1 and #3 to Detroit and drafting both of them! Of course it won't happen, but if some fools are throwing out trading Ramsey, Samuels and the #5 to SD for the #1 and Drew Brees I figured this wasn't any worse.
I would offer up gardner instead of bett's.
offiss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2004, 02:24 PM   #13
SKINSnCANES
Pro Bowl
 
SKINSnCANES's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: New Jersey
Age: 42
Posts: 5,454
throw um both in, and the supplemental draft choice to if ya want. Actually for Winslow and Taylor...The focus would shift to WInslow and Coles, leaving mismatches on Jacobs, THrash or McCants.
__________________
"I'm used to winning, coming from the University of Miami. " Clinton Portis
SKINSnCANES is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2004, 03:03 PM   #14
JWsleep
Propane and propane accessories
 
JWsleep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Houston, TX
Age: 55
Posts: 4,714
But they cut Chamberlin and traded B. Johnson. Iffy and Bowen sarted last year (yeah, I know, they were pretty weak. But still...), but who do we have at H-back? Sellars? He's going to be the lynchpin in Gibbs' offense? I doubt it.

Obviously Gibbs is worried about a hold out, so that may swing it. (Man, F*** the postons! They are screwing with us left and right!!!) But I think KW II would be a real nice fit for us.
__________________
Hail from Houston!

Last edited by JWsleep; 04-21-2004 at 08:09 PM.
JWsleep is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2004, 04:38 PM   #15
Jamaican'Skin
The Starter
 
Jamaican'Skin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Kingston, Jamaica
Age: 38
Posts: 2,418
I think he would too, if he didn't have an attitude problem. I see KWII Messing up stuff in the locker room, thereby messing up the team's karma. I rather have Taylor.
Jamaican'Skin is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:37 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.56247 seconds with 10 queries