Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


why not cut nemo?

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-13-2005, 08:40 PM   #1
jamf
Pro Bowl
 
jamf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: San Diego Ca
Posts: 5,296
why not cut nemo?

im glad to see brown go, i dont think he will make an impact anywhere else. trackstars are a dime a dozen...

but we only had 4 WR's now and jacobs cant get on the field so basicly we have 3 for mondays game.
does anyone else have a problems with this?
moss missed some time last game with a calf injury. patten has missed alot of time in his career. thrash is solid(hope i dont jinx him )

with one injury we drastically limit our offence.

i like nemo but rock is better than he is on offence and special teams and there is alot of depth at rb/fb. nemo should be gone or maybe one of the clemons brothers.


btw, at some point we have to get rid of john hall if he cant stay healthy. we are wasting a roster spot on his bad hamstrings/quadriceps.
jamf is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 09-13-2005, 08:43 PM   #2
That Guy
Living Legend
 
That Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 42
Posts: 17,553
Re: why not cut nemo?

i think killing and raymer are next on the list, nemo is the big back. rock is more of a catching out of the backfield type rb that can do some short yardage... a bunch of his 3rd and 1s in 2003 where runs to the outside.
That Guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2005, 08:43 PM   #3
skinsguy
Pro Bowl
 
skinsguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Greensboro, North Carolina
Posts: 6,766
Re: why not cut nemo?

I like Nemo and feel he's going to be a deciding factor in our offense eventually. Brown had so much potiential, but he couldn't make it as a wide receiver and fumbling on kick offs is a no-no.

We could always resign Dyson if we need another person at WR. I don't believe he signed with anyone else did he?
__________________
"Fire Up That Diesel!"
skinsguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2005, 08:45 PM   #4
illdefined
Playmaker
 
illdefined's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: nyc
Age: 48
Posts: 2,631
Re: why not cut nemo?

how did everyone forget about our #4 WR Sean Taylor?
illdefined is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2005, 08:46 PM   #5
BossHog
Registered User
 
BossHog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Norfolk, Va
Posts: 665
Re: why not cut nemo?

I've said it before. Bring back Farris. He's a solid WR and returner. You'd think if we wanted a 6' 3" 230 lb WR (Taylor) we would've drafted one or held on to Gardner or McCants. Moving Nemo isn't neccessary until you have another prospect. And how come we didn't see him in fourth and short situations against CHI?
BossHog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2005, 08:49 PM   #6
BossHog
Registered User
 
BossHog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Norfolk, Va
Posts: 665
Re: why not cut nemo?

Quote:
Originally Posted by skinsguy
We could always resign Dyson if we need another person at WR. I don't believe he signed with anyone else did he?
Dyson (and McCants) seemed to undermine what we were doing on offense, as if the offense, or Ramsey, wasn't working.
BossHog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2005, 08:51 PM   #7
skinsguy
Pro Bowl
 
skinsguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Greensboro, North Carolina
Posts: 6,766
Re: why not cut nemo?

I forgot about Farris - he had a very good game against the Ravens.
__________________
"Fire Up That Diesel!"
skinsguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2005, 08:53 PM   #8
e16bball
Special Teams
 
e16bball's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 163
Re: why not cut nemo?

We can definitely use a big WR now. The speedsters have been effectively rendered useless by the QB switch.
e16bball is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2005, 09:02 PM   #9
skinsguy
Pro Bowl
 
skinsguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Greensboro, North Carolina
Posts: 6,766
Re: why not cut nemo?

*Yawn* Is this going to be in every thread?
__________________
"Fire Up That Diesel!"
skinsguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2005, 10:20 PM   #10
Riggo44
The Starter
 
Riggo44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: San Clemente CA
Age: 51
Posts: 2,390
Re: why not cut nemo?

Quote:
Originally Posted by BossHog
I've said it before. Bring back Farris. He's a solid WR and returner. You'd think if we wanted a 6' 3" 230 lb WR (Taylor) we would've drafted one or held on to Gardner or McCants. Moving Nemo isn't neccessary until you have another prospect. And how come we didn't see him in fourth and short situations against CHI?
I agree. Farris would be a welcome addition in my book. I really like how he always went 100 miles an hour. I was bumed we cut him.
__________________
Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy.
Benjamin Franklin
Riggo44 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2005, 12:25 AM   #11
That Guy
Living Legend
 
That Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 42
Posts: 17,553
Re: why not cut nemo?

people always seem to get attached to the WR that just wasn't good enough... last year we all wanted to keep gari scott.
That Guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2005, 02:09 AM   #12
jamf
Pro Bowl
 
jamf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: San Diego Ca
Posts: 5,296
Re: why not cut nemo?

forget about who was cut and who should come back. isnt having 3 healthy WR's just stupid?
jamf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2005, 02:21 AM   #13
drew54
The Starter
 
drew54's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: IOWA
Age: 42
Posts: 1,324
Re: why not cut nemo?

I like the new Darth Gibbs. Eff up once and your dead. Either cut or demoted. Watch your back Sellars. One stupid personal foul away from the chop.



PS Sarcasim, this whole dropping guys super freaking early scares the shit out of me. Maybe it will scare the shit out of the guys so they play better on Sunday.
__________________
No pressure, no diamonds.
drew54 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2005, 07:46 AM   #14
GoSkins!
The Starter
 
GoSkins!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Yorktown, Va
Age: 55
Posts: 1,587
Re: why not cut nemo?

Quote:
Originally Posted by jamf
forget about who was cut and who should come back. isnt having 3 healthy WR's just stupid?
Can't find it now but I read that Taylor Jacobs should be at 100 percent for the Dallas game.
__________________
Not everything that counts can be counted, and not everything that can be counted counts. A. Einstien
GoSkins! is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2005, 07:48 AM   #15
GoSkins!
The Starter
 
GoSkins!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Yorktown, Va
Age: 55
Posts: 1,587
Re: why not cut nemo?

Quote:
Originally Posted by BossHog
I've said it before. Bring back Farris. He's a solid WR and returner. You'd think if we wanted a 6' 3" 230 lb WR (Taylor) we would've drafted one or held on to Gardner or McCants. Moving Nemo isn't neccessary until you have another prospect. And how come we didn't see him in fourth and short situations against CHI?
Nemo was inactive for the Bears game.
__________________
Not everything that counts can be counted, and not everything that can be counted counts. A. Einstien
GoSkins! is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:15 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 3.65310 seconds with 10 queries