![]() |
|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#1 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 293
|
2005 NFL Sleeper Team
Who is your sleeper team (other than us) for this season and why?
|
![]() |
![]() |
Advertisements |
![]() |
#2 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 293
|
Re: sleeper '05
I'm still a Marvin Lewis fan...I think the Bengals are gonna turn it around. Carson Palmer showed flashes of greatness last year and I think with their defensive additions they could make a run at the playoffs.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Impact Rookie
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 602
|
Re: sleeper '05
I think Dennis Green will make Arizona do something this year. I'm saying maybe a wildcard spot but probably around .500 which is a breakout year for Arizona.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: the port, PA
Age: 40
Posts: 692
|
Re: sleeper '05
I agree with the Bengals in the AFC. In the NFC I could see the Lions or the Cardinals turning some heads. Both teams had very good drafts and had solid FA pickups, plus both teams have very experienced head coaches. If the NFC is as screwed up as it was last year I could see either of these teams making a playoff run. My other team to do damage is the Ravens. Although they are not really a sleeper I think with their additions in the draft and in free agency make them a big time contender in the AFC no matter how tough the conference.
__________________
R.I.P. ST 21.....never forgotten |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Charlotte, NC
Age: 55
Posts: 306
|
Re: sleeper '05
Can you define what you would call a "sleeper" team? A team that did not make the playoff's last year? A team with a losing record that will have a winning record?
__________________
I am tired of being a special teams ace, but I really have nothing to say. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Rehoboth Beach, DE
Posts: 3,494
|
Re: sleeper '05
Quote:
__________________
There's nowhere to go but up. Or down. I guess we could stay where we are, too. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 293
|
Re: sleeper '05
I dont think theres a clear cut definition of sleeper. To me it's a team that lacked in the win department the past few years. A team that doesnt get much media attention and or negative attention. The Chargers I think were the sleeper last year...who would have expected them to do what they did?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Charlotte, NC
Age: 55
Posts: 306
|
Re: sleeper '05
I would think the Panther jump to mind. Did not make the playoff's last year and had a losing record. They are healthy again and should make a run. Ride with Duffman003 on the Cards. They are very close to putting it togethor. Beangals have been 8-8 for the past two seasons. I don't know about those guys. Marvin is a great defensive coach but I wonder if his act will still have the same fire after two seasons.
Watch out for the Chief's if they can get some defensive stops this season they will be tough to stop with that offense.
__________________
I am tired of being a special teams ace, but I really have nothing to say. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
\m/
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 52
Posts: 99,732
|
Re: sleeper '05
I wouldn't call the Panthers a sleeper, they came on awfully strong down the stretch last year and almost snuck into the playoffs after a horrible start.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Charlotte, NC
Age: 55
Posts: 306
|
Re: sleeper '05
Again Matty I asked the question "What is the definition of a sleeper". The Panthers did have a losing record and missed the playoffs last year losing their final home game to the Saints. On the other hand they nearly won the Super Bowl two years ago.
__________________
I am tired of being a special teams ace, but I really have nothing to say. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Rehoboth Beach, DE
Posts: 3,494
|
Re: sleeper '05
Personally, I think the Panthers are due for a down year. They are based on a strong running game and explosive defense. Their RB's are oft-injured and old (sorry, Stephen), and their defense (other than a stellar line) isn't very deep. The loss of Sam Mills (RIP) will be a blow as well.
John Fox, though a great defensive mind, is also a rah-rah guy. That tends to be successful early (Super Bowl in the second year), but grate on the veterans late.
__________________
There's nowhere to go but up. Or down. I guess we could stay where we are, too. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: sleeper '05
How about the Bills?
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Charlotte, NC
Age: 55
Posts: 306
|
Re: sleeper '05
TAFKAS, The Bills are an interesting choice. Losman, like Ramsey, is the key to success for those guys. Tough division.
__________________
I am tired of being a special teams ace, but I really have nothing to say. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Puppy Kicker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arlington, Virginia
Age: 42
Posts: 8,341
|
Re: sleeper '05
I'll take the Detroit Lions to take the NFC North! Like the coach, love the runner, love the WR's, young defense has been improving, big question is what Harrington can do.
__________________
Best. Player. Available. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 45
Posts: 8,317
|
Re: sleeper '05
BOOM - Cardinals (the Vikes aren't sleepers) in the NFC and Bengals in the AFC.
BUST - Bills in the AFC (Losman isn't Roethlisberger) and Lions in the NFC (the Lions have the talent and good young roster, but Harrington isn't the answer). |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|