Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Start John Beck Madness Thread

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-02-2011, 05:12 PM   #1
12thMan
MVP
 
12thMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: washington, D.C.
Posts: 11,460
Start John Beck Madness Thread

I don't think Shanny should yank Rex, I just wanted to get the silly thread going and out of the way.
12thMan is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 10-02-2011, 05:14 PM   #2
rbanerjee23
The Starter
 
rbanerjee23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,440
Re: Start John Beck Madness Thread

Why not?
__________________
"Tough times don't last but tough people do"

-Mike Shanahan

HTTR
rbanerjee23 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2011, 05:14 PM   #3
skinsfan69
Living Legend
 
skinsfan69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,265
Re: Start John Beck Madness Thread

I agree. If the Ram defender could catch they would've had a pick 6. He just doesn't take care of the ball. I've seen enough of the guy. He's a nice back up but nothing more. Now with the bye they have two weeks to get Beck ready. Make the move.
skinsfan69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2011, 05:15 PM   #4
Ruhskins
Living Legend
 
Ruhskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,331
Re: Start John Beck Madness Thread

Rex was responsible for one pick. All I want out of Rex is a game manager, but I don't think that KS' play calling is helping with that.

And what happens when we get Beck? We get another game manager.
__________________
R.I.P. #21
Ruhskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2011, 05:16 PM   #5
12thMan
MVP
 
12thMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: washington, D.C.
Posts: 11,460
Re: Start John Beck Madness Thread

Pretty hard to bench your QB when you're 3-1, that's all I'm saying.
12thMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2011, 05:16 PM   #6
DynamiteRave
Living Legend
 
DynamiteRave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Washington DC
Age: 38
Posts: 16,867
Re: Start John Beck Madness Thread

I think it needs to be taken into consideration at the minimum. I'm all for continuity but Rex almost single handled screwed us into at least a tie game. (Along with Moss. I know I know) Rams just sucked at offense and our defense is superb.

There's time to work out Rex's vision but.. He makes me extremely nervous as our QB.
__________________
Establishment, establishment, you always know what's best.

I've been a part of this message board for 17 years. Damn I'm old.
DynamiteRave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2011, 05:16 PM   #7
skinsfaninok
Warpath Hall of Fame
 
skinsfaninok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: UNITED STATES
Age: 37
Posts: 36,113
Re: Start John Beck Madness Thread

We r 3-1 but Rex isn't the reason, Try Beck why not?
__________________
“Mediocre people don’t like high achievers, and high achievers don’t like mediocre people.”
― Nick Saban
skinsfaninok is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2011, 05:18 PM   #8
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,462
Re: Start John Beck Madness Thread

Dumb idea. Even worse to even entertain the idea at 3-1.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2011, 05:19 PM   #9
DynamiteRave
Living Legend
 
DynamiteRave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Washington DC
Age: 38
Posts: 16,867
Re: Start John Beck Madness Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by 12thMan View Post
Pretty hard to bench your QB when you're 3-1, that's all I'm saying.
I don't think Rex is that reason though. I think it's our running game and our defense keeping us in the game.

Rexy is far more lucky than good.
__________________
Establishment, establishment, you always know what's best.

I've been a part of this message board for 17 years. Damn I'm old.
DynamiteRave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2011, 05:19 PM   #10
Dirtbag59
Naega jeil jal naga
 
Dirtbag59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, Georgia From: Silver Spring, Maryland
Age: 39
Posts: 14,750
Re: Start John Beck Madness Thread

Before the justification to start Rex over Beck was sky high productivity seen during both the Giants game and second half against the Cards. We haven't seen that since the end of Week 2.
__________________
"It's nice to be important, but its more important to be nice."
- Scooter

"I feel like Dirtbag has been slowly and methodically trolling the board for a month or so now."
- FRPLG
Dirtbag59 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2011, 05:21 PM   #11
12thMan
MVP
 
12thMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: washington, D.C.
Posts: 11,460
Re: Start John Beck Madness Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by DynamiteRave View Post
I don't think Rex is that reason though. I think it's our running game and our defense keeping us in the game.

Rexy is far more lucky than good.
So if we're 3-1, then what's the justification for bringing in Beck?
12thMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2011, 05:22 PM   #12
skinsfaninok
Warpath Hall of Fame
 
skinsfaninok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: UNITED STATES
Age: 37
Posts: 36,113
Re: Start John Beck Madness Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dirtbag59 View Post
Before the justification to start Rex over Beck was sky high productivity seen during both the Giants game and second half against the Cards. We haven't seen that since the end of Week 2.

Yes exactly
__________________
“Mediocre people don’t like high achievers, and high achievers don’t like mediocre people.”
― Nick Saban
skinsfaninok is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2011, 05:24 PM   #13
Dirtbag59
Naega jeil jal naga
 
Dirtbag59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, Georgia From: Silver Spring, Maryland
Age: 39
Posts: 14,750
Re: Start John Beck Madness Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by 12thMan View Post
Pretty hard to bench your QB when you're 3-1, that's all I'm saying.
It's like any other position. You have to look at it on an a player by player basis. This win was in spite of Rex and last week wasn't much better. Besides worse comes to worse you can always go back to Rex. It's time to take advantage of not having to manage the ego of a big name QB.
__________________
"It's nice to be important, but its more important to be nice."
- Scooter

"I feel like Dirtbag has been slowly and methodically trolling the board for a month or so now."
- FRPLG
Dirtbag59 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2011, 05:24 PM   #14
Ruhskins
Living Legend
 
Ruhskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,331
Re: Start John Beck Madness Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by 12thMan View Post
So if we're 3-1, then what's the justification for bringing in Beck?
Because fans love to blame just players and not criticize coaches.
__________________
R.I.P. #21
Ruhskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2011, 05:24 PM   #15
DynamiteRave
Living Legend
 
DynamiteRave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Washington DC
Age: 38
Posts: 16,867
Re: Start John Beck Madness Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by 12thMan View Post
So if we're 3-1, then what's the justification for bringing in Beck?
Because he can't be any worse than Rexy.

I mean honestly, both of these guys aren't starting material. It's not like going from Brady to JaMarcus Russell or anything. It's not gonna be a huge drop off.
__________________
Establishment, establishment, you always know what's best.

I've been a part of this message board for 17 years. Damn I'm old.
DynamiteRave is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:11 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 3.71012 seconds with 10 queries