Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Good Read on McNabb's progress so far.

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-29-2010, 04:47 PM   #1
skinsfaninok
Warpath Hall of Fame
 
skinsfaninok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: UNITED STATES
Age: 37
Posts: 36,113
Good Read on McNabb's progress so far.

Big Question: McNabb ready? - NFC East Blog - ESPN

Mosley seems to always have good points when it comes to QB's in the NFC East. I agree with him on our WR situation, Moss is the only true proven WR. Thomas and Kelly have to really step up their games this season. I would still like a T.O signing before Training camp.
__________________
“Mediocre people don’t like high achievers, and high achievers don’t like mediocre people.”
― Nick Saban
skinsfaninok is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 06-29-2010, 04:54 PM   #2
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,464
Re: Good Read on McNabb's progress so far.

Yes, we have questions at WR. Yes, McNabb is learning a new offense.

Not to be a hater but honestly, more of the same old from Mosley here. We're officially in that dark period right before camp where pickings are slim when it comes to meaningful stories.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2010, 05:01 PM   #3
sandtrapjack
The Starter
 
sandtrapjack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,994
Re: Good Read on McNabb's progress so far.

Be careful what you wish for regarding T.O., or you may just get it.

This point in the year, training camp rosters are primarily set. That means that to bring in another WR, whether his name is T.O. or not, would mean either:

A season ending injury to a projected starter on the roster

or

One of the young draftees is more of a bust.

I dont think you want either.
sandtrapjack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2010, 07:58 PM   #4
rbanerjee23
The Starter
 
rbanerjee23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,440
Re: Good Read on McNabb's progress so far.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk View Post
Yes, we have questions at WR. Yes, McNabb is learning a new offense.

Not to be a hater but honestly, more of the same old from Mosley here. We're officially in that dark period right before camp where pickings are slim when it comes to meaningful stories.
Seriously, does this guy ever have a single insightful opinion when it comes to the Redskins? All he talks about are the fact that the OL has questions, 3-4 defense might have some trouble, etc.

Rally Mosley, really? that is the best you could come up with? Don't insult us by feeding us the same rehashed opinions over and over again.
__________________
"Tough times don't last but tough people do"

-Mike Shanahan

HTTR
rbanerjee23 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2010, 07:59 PM   #5
Schneed10
A Dude
 
Schneed10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Newtown Square, PA
Age: 45
Posts: 12,421
Re: Good Read on McNabb's progress so far.

I think Mosely has a real good point here about the growing pains with a new QB. Difference is though the talent we have at T now will allow McNabb time to improvise when the play breaks down, something he's always been good at doing.

Williams and Brown will allow McNabb to play like McNabb. Their acquisitions were just as big as McNabb himself.
__________________
God made certain people to play football. He was one of them.
Schneed10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:59 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 1.58088 seconds with 10 queries