![]() |
|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#1 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Aug 2008
Age: 57
Posts: 21,503
|
SI Ranks Offensive Backfields
Somehow, this just irritates the h*** out of me, even though as has been said many times, rankings right now are useless.
Philip Rivers, LaDanian Tomlinson lead top NFL backfield - NFL - SI.com New York #2 Dallas #3 Eagles #5 I will let you look for yourselves where they put JC/CP and crew. (hint: look on the last page) |
![]() |
![]() |
Advertisements |
![]() |
#2 |
Puppy Kicker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arlington, Virginia
Age: 41
Posts: 8,341
|
Re: SI Ranks Offensive Backfields
JC is probably somewhere between 25-32 as far as QBs in the league right now. Portis has been taking a ton of punishment over the past few years. I really can't argue with our ranking.
__________________
Best. Player. Available. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Gamebreaker
![]() Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 12,921
|
Re: SI Ranks Offensive Backfields
I was going to post this thread but it pissed me off so much I couldn't do it. 26 seriously! JC and CP are worst then 25 other combo's in the NFL? Really, do they get paid for this shit?
__________________
When life gives you paper jams, turn them into paper footballs! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Aug 2008
Age: 57
Posts: 21,503
|
Re: SI Ranks Offensive Backfields
Quote:
Is it September yet. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Aug 2008
Age: 57
Posts: 21,503
|
Re: SI Ranks Offensive Backfields
Quote:
If JC/CP are even close to that number, then DS must be slipping Koolaid into my soda all the time, cuz I can't see it in anyway shape or form. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
\m/
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 52
Posts: 99,686
|
Re: SI Ranks Offensive Backfields
Rankings don't mean shit come September. Who cares.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Gamebreaker
![]() Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 12,921
|
Re: SI Ranks Offensive Backfields
Agreed but still pisses me off...I am sick of all this no respect.
__________________
When life gives you paper jams, turn them into paper footballs! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Kill Devil Hills, N.C.
Posts: 7,570
|
Re: SI Ranks Offensive Backfields
This s**t is laughable. It just makes it that much sweeter when we outplay the teams ranked ahead of us. Maybe I should have been a sportswriter, anybody can write that crap. The best way to get these morons is to prove them wrong. Hurry September!
__________________
Defense wins championships. Bring it! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
MVP
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Seattle
Age: 45
Posts: 10,069
|
Re: SI Ranks Offensive Backfields
LOL...what a joke.
__________________
"The Redskins have always suffered from chronic organizational deformities under Snyder." -Jenkins |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
The Starter
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 1,555
|
Re: SI Ranks Offensive Backfields
I have trouble discerning any logic to this list and that is not just with regards to the Redskins. I mean, the Jaguars 32nd in the NFL? Seriously? Have you ever watched Jones-Drew? But Orton and Moreno are 24th? This list is even more arbitrary than the "Power Rankings." Plus are we still believing that Tomlinson is the 2006 version?
__________________
It has taken a long time, but I have finally realized that nothing I say about the Redskins will have any effect upon anything the Redskins do. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,575
|
Re: SI Ranks Offensive Backfields
No surprise there. JC has shown nothing as a QB and CP is good but like the piece states, he's getting long in the tooth. The rank may be a bit low but I cant see them being higher than 20.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: SI Ranks Offensive Backfields
I dont see why anyone would think Campbell/Portis would be any higher. Campbell hasnt shown anything yet in the NFL. Hopefully he can step up his game but right now its hard for me to rank Campbell/Portis highly. Portis is a good RB but when teams started to shut down the running game last year Campbell was terrible. From what anyone has seen so far it would be hard for anyone to rank Campbell/Portis higher. I do think Campbell/Portis have the potenial to move up on this list this season.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: SI Ranks Offensive Backfields
How can they not be higher than the Jets when Sanchez hasn't even taken a single NFL snap? You say Campbell has shown nothing, well what has MS shown? And give me Campbell any day of the week over Shaun Hill or Sage Rosenfels.
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Age: 54
Posts: 5,006
|
Re: SI Ranks Offensive Backfields
I'd have to think they're more in the 15-20 range. People have gone way overboard in their downgrading of Campbell as the offseason has gone on. It's going to be really interesting around these parts (and especially over at ES-dear God!) come November when we're in the thick of the division race and JC is leading the way for us.
__________________
Paintrain's Redskins Fandom 1981-2014 I'm not dead but this team is dead to me...but now that McCloughan is here they may have new life! Jay Gruden = Zorny McSpurrier Kirk Cousins = Next Grossman |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: SI Ranks Offensive Backfields
Quote:
As for Sanchez I could understand why they would rank the Jets higher. The combo of Jones and Washington was great last year. Sanchez hasnt played in the NFL yet but most people would take a guy who hasnt shown anything in the NFL yet over a player like Campbell who has shown he cant lead a NFL offense as of today. Id easily take Rosenfels/Peterson over Campbell/Portis. As for Hill/Gore id say thats pretty even right now. Hill is the better QB but Portis is the better RB. I do think Campbell will step up his play this year but until the offense shows a pulse its hard for me to say Campbell/Portis should be higher than another combo. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|