Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


SI Ranks Offensive Backfields

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-27-2009, 11:47 AM   #1
CRedskinsRule
Living Legend
 
CRedskinsRule's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Age: 57
Posts: 21,503
SI Ranks Offensive Backfields

Somehow, this just irritates the h*** out of me, even though as has been said many times, rankings right now are useless.

Philip Rivers, LaDanian Tomlinson lead top NFL backfield - NFL - SI.com

New York #2
Dallas #3
Eagles #5

I will let you look for yourselves where they put JC/CP and crew. (hint: look on the last page)
CRedskinsRule is online now   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 05-27-2009, 11:51 AM   #2
Daseal
Puppy Kicker
 
Daseal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arlington, Virginia
Age: 41
Posts: 8,341
Re: SI Ranks Offensive Backfields

JC is probably somewhere between 25-32 as far as QBs in the league right now. Portis has been taking a ton of punishment over the past few years. I really can't argue with our ranking.
__________________
Best. Player. Available.
Daseal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2009, 11:53 AM   #3
mredskins
Gamebreaker
 
mredskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 12,921
Re: SI Ranks Offensive Backfields

I was going to post this thread but it pissed me off so much I couldn't do it. 26 seriously! JC and CP are worst then 25 other combo's in the NFL? Really, do they get paid for this shit?
__________________
When life gives you paper jams, turn them into paper footballs!
mredskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2009, 12:00 PM   #4
CRedskinsRule
Living Legend
 
CRedskinsRule's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Age: 57
Posts: 21,503
Re: SI Ranks Offensive Backfields

Quote:
Originally Posted by Daseal View Post
JC is probably somewhere between 25-32 as far as QBs in the league right now. Portis has been taking a ton of punishment over the past few years. I really can't argue with our ranking.
Wow, I can't fathom either statement. Regardless of the JC's standing, CP ran for nearly 1500 yds, had a combined total around 1800. He is under 30, and will be elite for atleast this year, probably next. For this ranking to be right, you would have to have JC like 56th out of the 32...

Is it September yet.
CRedskinsRule is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2009, 12:04 PM   #5
CRedskinsRule
Living Legend
 
CRedskinsRule's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Age: 57
Posts: 21,503
Re: SI Ranks Offensive Backfields

Quote:
Originally Posted by mredskins View Post
I was going to post this thread but it pissed me off so much I couldn't do it. 26 seriously! JC and CP are worst then 25 other combo's in the NFL? Really, do they get paid for this ***?
I hear ya. I probably should have let it pass by, but man...

If JC/CP are even close to that number, then DS must be slipping Koolaid into my soda all the time, cuz I can't see it in anyway shape or form.
CRedskinsRule is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2009, 12:04 PM   #6
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 52
Posts: 99,686
Re: SI Ranks Offensive Backfields

Rankings don't mean shit come September. Who cares.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2009, 12:49 PM   #7
mredskins
Gamebreaker
 
mredskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 12,921
Re: SI Ranks Offensive Backfields

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk72 View Post
Rankings don't mean shit come September. Who cares.
Agreed but still pisses me off...I am sick of all this no respect.
__________________
When life gives you paper jams, turn them into paper footballs!
mredskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2009, 01:56 PM   #8
53Fan
Franchise Player
 
53Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Kill Devil Hills, N.C.
Posts: 7,570
Re: SI Ranks Offensive Backfields

This s**t is laughable. It just makes it that much sweeter when we outplay the teams ranked ahead of us. Maybe I should have been a sportswriter, anybody can write that crap. The best way to get these morons is to prove them wrong. Hurry September!
__________________
Defense wins championships. Bring it!
53Fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2009, 02:06 PM   #9
saden1
MVP
 
saden1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Seattle
Age: 45
Posts: 10,069
Re: SI Ranks Offensive Backfields

LOL...what a joke.
__________________
"The Redskins have always suffered from chronic organizational deformities under Snyder."

-Jenkins
saden1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2009, 02:06 PM   #10
SC Skins Fan
The Starter
 
SC Skins Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 1,555
Re: SI Ranks Offensive Backfields

I have trouble discerning any logic to this list and that is not just with regards to the Redskins. I mean, the Jaguars 32nd in the NFL? Seriously? Have you ever watched Jones-Drew? But Orton and Moreno are 24th? This list is even more arbitrary than the "Power Rankings." Plus are we still believing that Tomlinson is the 2006 version?
__________________
It has taken a long time, but I have finally realized that nothing I say about the Redskins will have any effect upon anything the Redskins do.
SC Skins Fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2009, 02:37 PM   #11
irish
Playmaker
 
irish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,575
Re: SI Ranks Offensive Backfields

No surprise there. JC has shown nothing as a QB and CP is good but like the piece states, he's getting long in the tooth. The rank may be a bit low but I cant see them being higher than 20.
irish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2009, 03:07 PM   #12
Brian Orakpo
Guest
 
Brian Orakpo's Avatar
 
Posts: n/a
Re: SI Ranks Offensive Backfields

I dont see why anyone would think Campbell/Portis would be any higher. Campbell hasnt shown anything yet in the NFL. Hopefully he can step up his game but right now its hard for me to rank Campbell/Portis highly. Portis is a good RB but when teams started to shut down the running game last year Campbell was terrible. From what anyone has seen so far it would be hard for anyone to rank Campbell/Portis higher. I do think Campbell/Portis have the potenial to move up on this list this season.
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2009, 03:11 PM   #13
SmootSmack
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
Re: SI Ranks Offensive Backfields

How can they not be higher than the Jets when Sanchez hasn't even taken a single NFL snap? You say Campbell has shown nothing, well what has MS shown? And give me Campbell any day of the week over Shaun Hill or Sage Rosenfels.
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2009, 03:18 PM   #14
Paintrain
Pro Bowl
 
Paintrain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Age: 54
Posts: 5,006
Re: SI Ranks Offensive Backfields

I'd have to think they're more in the 15-20 range. People have gone way overboard in their downgrading of Campbell as the offseason has gone on. It's going to be really interesting around these parts (and especially over at ES-dear God!) come November when we're in the thick of the division race and JC is leading the way for us.
__________________
Paintrain's Redskins Fandom
1981-2014

I'm not dead but this team is dead to me...but now that McCloughan is here they may have new life!

Jay Gruden = Zorny McSpurrier
Kirk Cousins = Next Grossman
Paintrain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2009, 03:22 PM   #15
Brian Orakpo
Guest
 
Brian Orakpo's Avatar
 
Posts: n/a
Re: SI Ranks Offensive Backfields

Quote:
Originally Posted by SmootSmack View Post
How can they not be higher than the Jets when Sanchez hasn't even taken a single NFL snap? You say Campbell has shown nothing, well what has MS shown? And give me Campbell any day of the week over Shaun Hill or Sage Rosenfels.
Honestly I didnt even look at the complete list. The main reason why I didnt was the way our offense got shut down last year. The Skins had the 4th ranked defense in the NFL and had trouble winning games. No matter who is ranked ahead of Campbell/Portis its hard for me to say they should be higher on this list after the way the team played last year. When Campbell starts living up to his potenial as a QB then ill talk about moving Campbell up on any list.

As for Sanchez I could understand why they would rank the Jets higher. The combo of Jones and Washington was great last year. Sanchez hasnt played in the NFL yet but most people would take a guy who hasnt shown anything in the NFL yet over a player like Campbell who has shown he cant lead a NFL offense as of today.

Id easily take Rosenfels/Peterson over Campbell/Portis. As for Hill/Gore id say thats pretty even right now. Hill is the better QB but Portis is the better RB.

I do think Campbell will step up his play this year but until the offense shows a pulse its hard for me to say Campbell/Portis should be higher than another combo.
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:31 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.32185 seconds with 10 queries