Has the WP decided attacking the Skins is good for business?

[CRedskinsRule]

We all know about JLC's lack of insider news and Sally Jenkins tendencies but after reading this article:

Sally Jenkins - Sally Jenkins: For Redskins, a Question of Layoffs vs. Payoffs - washingtonpost.com

I really wonder if the Post thinks the best way to get readers attention is to attack anything Redskins.

...
That the Redskins would cut lower-level employees as nonessential to the organization, while rewarding Haynesworth as vital to the tune of $48 million, betrays something fundamental about the team. In a league with a skewed reward system, the Redskins always manage to be at the far end of the skew. There is a certain tone-deaf profligacy at work. No, lower-wage staffers aren't as valuable to a team as a Haynesworth -- they don't come close to resembling his worth. But they resemble the sorts of people who actually watch the Redskins, and buy their gear: the paying public...

um that's a ridiculous statement.

(I think this is separate from JLC's lack of insider info thread but please merge if it blends together)