The Redskins want to replace Jon Jansen for good

bigm29 · 03-01-2009, 10:38 PM

Next Task: Filling Team's Remaining Holes - Redskins Insider

"The Redskins want to replace Jon Jansen for good, believing he was the weakest link on a unit that broke down in the second half."

sounds like they are going Oline with the 13th pick. Thats good news.

The Goat · 03-01-2009, 10:51 PM

JLC said some retarded stuff here IMO. We need to add 2 or 3 LBs? Really? What the hell are we doing switching to a 3-4 defense before the season starts. We need one playmaker at OLB to ensure 1) Taylor play's at his pro-bowl position RDE 2) if there is an injury to one of the starters we have a guy to come in and play like a starter i.e. Blades. JLC is just making stuff up here...

ncskinsfanatic · 03-01-2009, 10:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Goat

JLC said some retarded stuff here IMO. We need to add 2 or 3 LBs? Really? What the hell are we doing switching to a 3-4 defense before the season starts. We need one playmaker at OLB to ensure 1) Taylor play's at his pro-bowl position RDE 2) if there is an injury to one of the starters we have a guy to come in and play like a starter i.e. Blades. JLC is just making stuff up here...

It was actually jason Reid, Ja La is on break lol.

SFREDSKIN · 03-01-2009, 10:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Goat

JLC said some retarded stuff here IMO. We need to add 2 or 3 LBs? Really? What the hell are we doing switching to a 3-4 defense before the season starts. We need one playmaker at OLB to ensure 1) Taylor play's at his pro-bowl position RDE 2) if there is an injury to one of the starters we have a guy to come in and play like a starter i.e. Blades. JLC is just making stuff up here...

Sounds like what I wrote in the other thread.

Ruhskins · 03-01-2009, 10:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Goat

JLC said some retarded stuff here IMO. We need to add 2 or 3 LBs? Really? What the hell are we doing switching to a 3-4 defense before the season starts. We need one playmaker at OLB to ensure 1) Taylor play's at his pro-bowl position RDE 2) if there is an injury to one of the starters we have a guy to come in and play like a starter i.e. Blades. JLC is just making stuff up here...

Actually that was Jason Reid reporting. I do hope they go offensive line with the #13, preferably a tackle.

With all the b!tching about the defensive acquisitions, I don't know why anyone would suggest that we pick up a defensive player with our first pick (Goat, this has nothing to do with your comment btw).

The Goat · 03-01-2009, 10:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ncskinsfanatic

It was actually jason Reid, Ja La is on break lol.

imadork... well it read like a JLC article anyway.

SFREDSKIN · 03-01-2009, 10:55 PM

If they really want get rid of Jansen, then they should cut him and eat his salary cap. Sign Runyan (as much as I hate him, he's a mauler) draft Mack this year and draft another T or 2 in 2010.

Ruhskins · 03-01-2009, 10:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SFREDSKIN

Sounds like what I wrote in the other thread.

I didn't see anything about the Giants D-line destroying us in this article.

The Goat · 03-01-2009, 10:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ruhskins

I didn't see anything about the Giants D-line destroying us in this article.

SFREDSKIN · 03-01-2009, 10:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ruhskins

I didn't see anything about the Giants D-line destroying us in this article.

Ha, ha, you are funny!!

Dirtbag59 · 03-01-2009, 11:00 PM

Andre Smith is clearly the best option if he's there at 13. In my opinion he's going to be an elite RT (80) and an above average (75 on Scouts Inc scale) LT. Plus if we can get Smith our X and short situations are going to get a hell of a lot easier with him and Dockery. Plus lets not forget Sellers coming out of the backfield.

SFREDSKIN · 03-01-2009, 11:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dirtbag359

Andre Smith is clearly the best option if he's there at 13. In my opinion he's going to be an elite RT (80) and an above average (75 on Scouts Inc scale) LT.

As of now he's a risk, unless he can change his way till draft day.

The Goat · 03-01-2009, 11:02 PM

Isn't this old news anyway? I think i heard this right after the major coaches/FO meetings (the same time we heard Marcus would not be returning). Jansen will make a very good back-up IMO and wouldn't be surprised to see him compete on the interior, depending on Thomas' status, but regardless he's a goner next year as we'll save about 2.4 mill upon cutting him.

SmootSmack · 03-01-2009, 11:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SFREDSKIN

If they really want get rid of Jansen, then they should cut him and eat his salary cap. Sign Runyan (as much as I hate him, he's a mauler) draft Mack this year and draft another T or 2 in 2010.

Why would you replace Jansen with Runyan?

Ruhskins · 03-01-2009, 11:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SmootSmack

Why would you replace Jansen with Runyan?

So his stench can take out the d-linemen?

03-01-2009, 10:51 PM	#2
The Goat Pro Bowl Join Date: Jan 2008 Posts: 5,662	Re: The Redskins want to replace Jon Jansen for good JLC said some retarded stuff here IMO. We need to add 2 or 3 LBs? Really? What the hell are we doing switching to a 3-4 defense before the season starts. We need one playmaker at OLB to ensure 1) Taylor play's at his pro-bowl position RDE 2) if there is an injury to one of the starters we have a guy to come in and play like a starter i.e. Blades. JLC is just making stuff up here... __________________ 24-34

03-01-2009, 10:55 PM	#7
SFREDSKIN Living Legend Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Pacifica, CA Posts: 15,164	Re: The Redskins want to replace Jon Jansen for good If they really want get rid of Jansen, then they should cut him and eat his salary cap. Sign Runyan (as much as I hate him, he's a mauler) draft Mack this year and draft another T or 2 in 2010. __________________ Joe Gibbs- The best coach of all time, Lombardi trophy should be renamed Gibbs. Art Monk- Art was like an OL playing WR, doing the dirty work and not getting the glory. Darrell Green- Best DB ever. Purveyor of fine Filth

03-01-2009, 11:00 PM	#11
Dirtbag59 Naega jeil jal naga Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Atlanta, Georgia From: Silver Spring, Maryland Age: 39 Posts: 14,750	Re: The Redskins want to replace Jon Jansen for good Andre Smith is clearly the best option if he's there at 13. In my opinion he's going to be an elite RT (80) and an above average (75 on Scouts Inc scale) LT. Plus if we can get Smith our X and short situations are going to get a hell of a lot easier with him and Dockery. Plus lets not forget Sellers coming out of the backfield. __________________ "It's nice to be important, but its more important to be nice." - Scooter "I feel like Dirtbag has been slowly and methodically trolling the board for a month or so now." - FRPLG

03-01-2009, 10:38 PM	#1
bigm29 Special Teams Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Mt. Laurel, NJ Age: 36 Posts: 353	The Redskins want to replace Jon Jansen for good Next Task: Filling Team's Remaining Holes - Redskins Insider "The Redskins want to replace Jon Jansen for good, believing he was the weakest link on a unit that broke down in the second half." sounds like they are going Oline with the 13th pick. Thats good news. __________________ Hail Redskins!!!

03-01-2009, 11:02 PM	#13
The Goat Pro Bowl Join Date: Jan 2008 Posts: 5,662	Re: The Redskins want to replace Jon Jansen for good Isn't this old news anyway? I think i heard this right after the major coaches/FO meetings (the same time we heard Marcus would not be returning). Jansen will make a very good back-up IMO and wouldn't be surprised to see him compete on the interior, depending on Thomas' status, but regardless he's a goner next year as we'll save about 2.4 mill upon cutting him. __________________ 24-34

The Redskins want to replace Jon Jansen for good

Locker Room Main Forum