Official Depth Chart

JudgeJebus · 09-08-2004, 02:09 PM

The official depth chart has now been posted on redskins.com.

http://www.redskins.com/team/depthchart.jsp

No surprises, except maybe that Thrash and Jacobs are ahead of McCants. Cooley is also listed awfully low, especially as there's talk of him starting.

Krills · 09-08-2004, 02:32 PM

I think the Cooley thing might be a mistake. I hope it is anyway

bedlamVR · 09-08-2004, 02:40 PM

Also has Nobel ahead of Big Joe yet the WP reports Nobel likley as a back up.

SKINSnCANES · 09-08-2004, 03:08 PM

Im pretty sure I heard the Cooley was starting to, weird. Im sure he'll get plenty of snaps either way, even if he isnt the official starter to get his name called. Im hoping for great things out of him.

Big C · 09-08-2004, 04:04 PM

both the washington post and redskins.com had articles sayin cooley was gonna be the starter

PSUskinsfan11 · 09-08-2004, 04:29 PM

I am blown away that McCants is the 5th WR. There were reports that we might trade Gardner because McCants was good enough to be the second WR. What the hell happened at camp??? He looked good in preseason and he really impressed me last year and now he is behind JAMES THRASH?!?!?!?!

cpayne5 · 09-08-2004, 05:02 PM

We'll see the *official* depth chart sunday during the game.

It also states that James Thrash has chosen #83.

jrocx69 · 09-08-2004, 05:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PSUskinsfan11

I am blown away that McCants is the 5th WR. There were reports that we might trade Gardner because McCants was good enough to be the second WR. What the hell happened at camp??? He looked good in preseason and he really impressed me last year and now he is behind JAMES THRASH?!?!?!?!

why you knocking thrash? much more speed to stretch the d, and as well has alot of experience being a starter. i also think that the reports of the "eagles wrs stink" was to hide how bad mcnabb is as a passer. some of it lied with the wr's, but no where near as much as reported.

Big C · 09-08-2004, 05:36 PM

lets face it tho, thrash is not a #1 reciever, hes a decent #2, and a very good #3

PSUskinsfan11 · 09-08-2004, 06:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jrocx69

why you knocking thrash? much more speed to stretch the d, and as well has alot of experience being a starter. i also think that the reports of the "eagles wrs stink" was to hide how bad mcnabb is as a passer. some of it lied with the wr's, but no where near as much as reported.

are you serious. Thrash is not a starter. He could not start for us the first time he was here and he won't start now. McNabb, as much as I hate him, is not a bad passer. He is surrounded by the worst group of WR's in the league. Thrash was a number 1 there and he shouldn't even be 4th here. He does have speed so he can return our punts. If speed made you a good WR we would still have Russel on the team.

F.Y.I.

McCants our 3rd WR last year......360 yards 6 td's 13.3 avg. 7 catches over 20 yards

Thrash as the Eagles starter.....558 yards 1td 11.4 avg 5 catches over 20 yards

im4skins · 09-08-2004, 07:06 PM

James Trash is the type of player a team can't get rid of. Somehow his dad must be a big shot in the players union for him to stay in the league. When you have decent receivers like dyson getting cut, sometimes it makes you wonder. McCants should pass him on the depth list, and Trash should just be delegated to Special teams. McNabb is a horrible passer, but even someone like Manning can't make trash look good. I bet the Skins would give up a 10th round pick and him for a 12 pack of O'Doulls.

Daseal · 09-08-2004, 07:07 PM

Trash could be replaced by Gari Scott and we wouldn't even miss him. Jacobs, if he can get rid of injury, could be our top receiver. Yes, even King of the turf toe himself could fall to Jacobs. McCants does great... in the red zone. I still think some bench time to develop is something he needs. Im sure they'll all see the ball.

The St. Louis game seemed like Trash couldn't get his routes right, either that or Ramsey was way wrong in all of his throws. I'm guessing it was Thrash.

MTK · 09-08-2004, 07:09 PM

Well, going by Ramsey's pinpoint accuracy and firm grasp of the offense yeah Thrash probably ran the wrong routes.

SKINSnCANES · 09-08-2004, 07:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PSUskinsfan11

are you serious. Thrash is not a starter. He could not start for us the first time he was here and he won't start now. McNabb, as much as I hate him, is not a bad passer. He is surrounded by the worst group of WR's in the league. Thrash was a number 1 there and he shouldn't even be 4th here. He does have speed so he can return our punts. If speed made you a good WR we would still have Russel on the team.

F.Y.I.

McCants our 3rd WR last year......360 yards 6 td's 13.3 avg. 7 catches over 20 yards

Thrash as the Eagles starter.....558 yards 1td 11.4 avg 5 catches over 20 yards

interesting. Of course the eagles didnt really have staring receivers. I think Thrash played third string more than first. Mitchell and Pinkston usually were in the game the most.

MTK · 09-08-2004, 09:17 PM

Reid loves to spread the ball around, not only with the backs but with the WR's and TE's as well.

Don't be too surprised if Owens "only" ends up with 75 catches or so.

09-08-2004, 03:08 PM	#4
SKINSnCANES Pro Bowl Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: New Jersey Age: 42 Posts: 5,454	Im pretty sure I heard the Cooley was starting to, weird. Im sure he'll get plenty of snaps either way, even if he isnt the official starter to get his name called. Im hoping for great things out of him. __________________ "I'm used to winning, coming from the University of Miami. " Clinton Portis

09-08-2004, 04:04 PM	#5
Big C Mr. Brightside Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Leesburg, VA Age: 38 Posts: 4,453	both the washington post and redskins.com had articles sayin cooley was gonna be the starter __________________ "I don't care what nobody say I'm a be me, stay hood stay real, cause I'm out here grindin'" -Joe Gibbs

09-08-2004, 05:02 PM	#7
cpayne5 Playmaker Join Date: Feb 2004 Posts: 3,807	We'll see the official depth chart sunday during the game. It also states that James Thrash has chosen #83. __________________ "It's not about what you've done, but what's been done for you."

09-08-2004, 05:36 PM	#9
Big C Mr. Brightside Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Leesburg, VA Age: 38 Posts: 4,453	lets face it tho, thrash is not a #1 reciever, hes a decent #2, and a very good #3 __________________ "I don't care what nobody say I'm a be me, stay hood stay real, cause I'm out here grindin'" -Joe Gibbs

09-08-2004, 07:06 PM	#11
im4skins Camp Scrub Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: virginia Posts: 16	James Trash James Trash is the type of player a team can't get rid of. Somehow his dad must be a big shot in the players union for him to stay in the league. When you have decent receivers like dyson getting cut, sometimes it makes you wonder. McCants should pass him on the depth list, and Trash should just be delegated to Special teams. McNabb is a horrible passer, but even someone like Manning can't make trash look good. I bet the Skins would give up a 10th round pick and him for a 12 pack of O'Doulls.

09-08-2004, 02:09 PM	#1
JudgeJebus Camp Scrub Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Washington, D.C. Posts: 85	Official Depth Chart The official depth chart has now been posted on redskins.com. http://www.redskins.com/team/depthchart.jsp No surprises, except maybe that Thrash and Jacobs are ahead of McCants. Cooley is also listed awfully low, especially as there's talk of him starting.

09-08-2004, 02:32 PM	#2
Krills Special Teams Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Chesapeake, VA Age: 44 Posts: 123	I think the Cooley thing might be a mistake. I hope it is anyway

09-08-2004, 02:40 PM	#3
bedlamVR Special Teams Join Date: Apr 2004 Posts: 389	Also has Nobel ahead of Big Joe yet the WP reports Nobel likley as a back up.

09-08-2004, 04:29 PM	#6
PSUskinsfan11 Impact Rookie Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: the port, PA Age: 40 Posts: 692	I am blown away that McCants is the 5th WR. There were reports that we might trade Gardner because McCants was good enough to be the second WR. What the hell happened at camp??? He looked good in preseason and he really impressed me last year and now he is behind JAMES THRASH?!?!?!?!

09-08-2004, 07:07 PM	#12
Daseal Puppy Kicker Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Arlington, Virginia Age: 41 Posts: 8,341	Trash could be replaced by Gari Scott and we wouldn't even miss him. Jacobs, if he can get rid of injury, could be our top receiver. Yes, even King of the turf toe himself could fall to Jacobs. McCants does great... in the red zone. I still think some bench time to develop is something he needs. Im sure they'll all see the ball. The St. Louis game seemed like Trash couldn't get his routes right, either that or Ramsey was way wrong in all of his throws. I'm guessing it was Thrash.

09-08-2004, 07:09 PM	#13
MTK \m/ Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: NY Age: 52 Posts: 99,464	Well, going by Ramsey's pinpoint accuracy and firm grasp of the offense yeah Thrash probably ran the wrong routes.

09-08-2004, 09:17 PM	#15
MTK \m/ Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: NY Age: 52 Posts: 99,464	Reid loves to spread the ball around, not only with the backs but with the WR's and TE's as well. Don't be too surprised if Owens "only" ends up with 75 catches or so.

Official Depth Chart

Locker Room Main Forum