Voter Fraud In Ohio

[firstdown]

Ohio has big issues with the people registered to vote and over 200,000 newly registered voters name and addresses do not match up. So what is the Democratic Secratary of State Jennifer Brunner doing to check this out. Nothing.Supreme Court sides with Ohio elections chief, against state GOP in voter registration suit -- chicagotribune.com

[MTK]

So what's the problem exactly?

In court filings, the GOP has not produced any specific evidence of voting fraud, only unsubstantiated reports that voters from other states had cast fraudulent ballots during the early voting period.

[saden1]

What is the difference between registration fraud and voter fraud? Bonus question, would "Joe the Plumber" be eligible to vote in Ohio come Nov 4th if the GOP won?

[firstdown]

Originally Posted by Mattyk72

So what's the problem exactly?

Thats what she said but its her job under the American Voter Act to find out why over 200,000 people newly registered to vote does not have matching adresses. She is a Dem. and is ignoring the this fact and Accorn is in there registering who ever they can and they have legal issues everywhere they have been.

[MTK]

Originally Posted by firstdown

Thats what she said but its her job under the American Voter Act to find out why over 200,000 people newly registered to vote does not have matching adresses. She is a Dem. and is ignoring the this fact and Accorn is in there registering who ever they can and they have legal issues everywhere they have been.

I guess the Supreme Court disagrees

[MTK]

Originally Posted by saden1

What is the difference between registration fraud and voter fraud? Bonus question, would "Joe the Plumber" be eligible to vote in Ohio come Nov 4th if the GOP won?

LOL did you see SNL last night? Joe the Plumber lives in a box under his bed and is only 3 1/2 inches tall, with Simon the unicorn... hilarious

[firstdown]

Originally Posted by Mattyk72

I guess the Supreme Court disagrees

No the Supreme Court ruled that the Ohio Rep. party could not file the law suite under the rules of the act. They clearly stated that they did not rule on the merits of the case. Which really does not make any sense because who else would file the charges?

[saden1]

Originally Posted by Mattyk72

LOL did you see SNL last night? Joe the Plumber lives in a box under his bed and is only 3 1/2 inches tall, with Simon the unicorn... hilarious

No. SNL last night?

[MTK]

Originally Posted by saden1

No. SNL last night?

They've been doing a special half hour weekend update show every Thursday night after The Office.

NBC.com > Saturday Night Live

[MTK]

Originally Posted by firstdown

No the Supreme Court ruled that the Ohio Rep. party could not file the law suite under the rules of the act. They clearly stated that they did not rule on the merits of the case. Which really does not make any sense because who else would file the charges?

Doesn't it boil down to this? Sounds like there simply was not enough to establish anything.

In court filings, the GOP has not produced any specific evidence of voting fraud, only unsubstantiated reports that voters from other states had cast fraudulent ballots during the early voting period.

[saden1]

Originally Posted by Mattyk72

They've been doing a special half hour weekend update show every Thursday night after The Office.

NBC.com > Saturday Night Live

Oh, didn't know that.

[firstdown]

Originally Posted by Mattyk72

Doesn't it boil down to this? Sounds like there simply was not enough to establish anything.

No, thats what she said. The state court ruled in the Rep. favor and she had to have a system in place by today. She got lucky in the Supreme Court only because the Rep. could not bring the law suit. Its her job and she does not even have a system to check if they are fraudulent or not. Sorry but if the shoe was on the other foot she would be all over this. Remember that Bush won Ohio by less then 200,000 votes in the last election and it seems she is determined not to let that happen again.

[saden1]

You do realize that the Supreme Court is stacked with Republicans right? And that tossing people off the registry because their name is spelled incorrectly is wrong?

[firstdown]

Originally Posted by saden1

You do realize that the Supreme Court is stacked with Republicans right? And that tossing people off the registry because their name is spelled incorrectly is wrong?

Did you even read the article. Its has nothing to do with how their name is spelled. What they have for an address does not match up with the goverments records. Now if these were people who had been registered for years that might make sense but these are newly registered voters. Also Accorn is involved. Oh, and the supreme court is not stacked by rep.

[Hog1]

part of the FBI Acorn deal?

The Associated Press: Officials: FBI investigates ACORN for voter fraud