Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Thomas should be the third wideout

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-16-2008, 01:37 AM   #1
TurlockSkinsFan
Camp Scrub
 
TurlockSkinsFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Turlock, CA
Age: 44
Posts: 13
Thomas should be the third wideout

First off, I just want to start by saying this is my first thread so take it easy on me. Ok, so is it just me or should Devin Thomas be the third wideout? I believe that this stretch of games would be perfect for the kid to get some pt. Thrash is good, dependable old, just like your favorite tee-shirt. Great to lounge around the house in, but it's not gonna win you style points with the ladies. With this claim I'm saying that we know what we're getting from Thrash, at this point in his career it's not much. Thomas should be allowed to learn under fire if you will he is clearly more athletic and faster than Thrash let him prove himself. If he fails it keeps old man Thrash fresh for later in the season and at least we know for sure he's not ready. I get a bit envious watching other rooks play well, just give the kid a chance. Thanks for listening everyone.
TurlockSkinsFan is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 10-16-2008, 01:41 AM   #2
jamf
Pro Bowl
 
jamf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: San Diego Ca
Posts: 5,296
Re: Thomas should be the third wideout

I would definitely like to see DT play more but at the same time Thrash is a better player right now.

We proved last week that we can't take an opponent for granted, There is no way we should throw him out there just to get some playing time.
jamf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2008, 01:43 AM   #3
Ruhskins
Living Legend
 
Ruhskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,331
Re: Thomas should be the third wideout

When he stops with the offensive pass interferance penalties, he can be #3.
__________________
R.I.P. #21
Ruhskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2008, 02:25 AM   #4
Meks
Pro Bowl
 
Meks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: South Jersey
Age: 39
Posts: 5,605
Re: Thomas should be the third wideout

^ good point.

stick to slants reverses and screens for now.... seems everytime hes targeted deep, its an OFF. PI.
__________________
R.I.P #21SEAN TAYLOR
Meks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2008, 02:29 AM   #5
Dirtbag59
Naega jeil jal naga
 
Dirtbag59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, Georgia From: Silver Spring, Maryland
Age: 39
Posts: 14,750
Re: Thomas should be the third wideout

Quote:
Originally Posted by jamf View Post
I would definitely like to see DT play more but at the same time Thrash is a better player right now.

We proved last week that we can't take an opponent for granted, There is no way we should throw him out there just to get some playing time.
Agreed. This isn't Madden we're talking about here. Besides we can afford to be patient, Recievers take a long time to develop and we're doing fine in the passing game with minimal contributions from the rookies.
__________________
"It's nice to be important, but its more important to be nice."
- Scooter

"I feel like Dirtbag has been slowly and methodically trolling the board for a month or so now."
- FRPLG
Dirtbag59 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2008, 02:59 AM   #6
deathGRINDx
Camp Scrub
 
deathGRINDx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Norfolk, VA
Posts: 13
Re: Thomas should be the third wideout

He has the size, speed and talent to be a threat, but i cant help but be dissapointed in lack of production.
deathGRINDx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2008, 08:47 AM   #7
redskinrob
Camp Scrub
 
redskinrob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Boonsboro, MD
Posts: 10
Re: Thomas should be the third wideout

I agree with getting him more involved, but keeping him to the slants and screens. It will build his confidence with some more touches. He could be a factor in the redzone with his size, quick slant or screen with a broken tackle he could do some damage.
redskinrob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2008, 09:24 AM   #8
Daseal
Puppy Kicker
 
Daseal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arlington, Virginia
Age: 41
Posts: 8,341
Re: Thomas should be the third wideout

I'd like both of our rookie WRs to get some play time. I agree with plays that raise their confidence and are safe early. Especially if we ever get into a game that we have clear control of, we should target the young guys some.
__________________
Best. Player. Available.
Daseal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2008, 09:29 AM   #9
SkinFan4Life
Camp Scrub
 
SkinFan4Life's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Ft. Bragg, NC
Posts: 42
Re: Thomas should be the third wideout

I would like to see JZ call a couple 4 WR sets in obvious running situations and take a couple shots downfield just to keep the D honest.
SkinFan4Life is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2008, 09:45 AM   #10
JLW428
Special Teams
 
JLW428's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Rockville, MD
Posts: 422
Re: Thomas should be the third wideout

Quote:
Originally Posted by SkinFan4Life View Post
I would like to see JZ call a couple 4 WR sets in obvious running situations and take a couple shots downfield just to keep the D honest.
The D stays honest currently because of Santana. This is the reason the CP is leading the league in rushing yards.
JLW428 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2008, 09:51 AM   #11
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,464
Re: Thomas should be the third wideout

I see Thomas on the field plenty. He needs to start winning the trust of JC to earn more looks, simple as that.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2008, 10:46 AM   #12
GPRedskin
Camp Scrub
 
GPRedskin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 15
Re: Thomas should be the third wideout

Once he stops making mistakes then he can be #3. He needs to learn from a true pro like Thrash for a little longer. The future looks bright for DT.
GPRedskin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2008, 11:50 AM   #13
SouperMeister
Playmaker
 
SouperMeister's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Leesburg, VA
Age: 60
Posts: 3,419
Re: Thomas should be the third wideout

Quote:
Originally Posted by JLW428 View Post
The D stays honest currently because of Santana. This is the reason the CP is leading the league in rushing yards.
I would like to see Thomas play to keep defenses from completely overcommitting to defend Santana. Thomas is our only other WR with game breaking speed.
SouperMeister is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2008, 11:54 AM   #14
Stacks42
Impact Rookie
 
Stacks42's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Arlington Va.
Age: 48
Posts: 834
Re: Thomas should be the third wideout

I've got an idea, Move DT to kick returner, and move Rock to punt returner. That would get him on the field and possibly jump start our punt return game.

http://grfx.cstv.com/photos/schools/...omasCareer.pdf
__________________
The NEXT special teams coordinator
Stacks42 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2008, 12:07 PM   #15
CA_Redskins
Camp Scrub
 
CA_Redskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: San Diego
Posts: 46
Re: Thomas should be the third wideout

Quote:
Originally Posted by SkinFan4Life View Post
I would like to see JZ call a couple 4 WR sets in obvious running situations and take a couple shots downfield just to keep the D honest.
Um... you must be a big Collins fan. Do you like seeing JC on his back picking grass out of his mouth? This didn't go so great last week.

Our line is having a hard enough time with the pass protection. Now you want to be down a man?

Thomas will develop. He'll get more touches as the season goes. Give it time.

Last edited by CA_Redskins; 10-16-2008 at 12:17 PM.
CA_Redskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:39 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.93078 seconds with 10 queries