Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Why the low expectations from the pre-season mags?

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-24-2008, 11:58 AM   #1
Paintrain
Pro Bowl
 
Paintrain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Age: 54
Posts: 5,006
Why the low expectations from the pre-season mags?

With the offseason mags coming out, the consensus seems to be the Redskins will be in last place in the NFC East with anywhere from 4-6 wins. For a playoff team that was one of the hottest teams entering the post season & returning 22 starters, what factors do you think national writers are using?

(Mods-Poll please)
New Coach/System Uncertainty
Everyone else in the division is simply better
We got lucky last year and weren't that good anyways
General disregard for all positive things Redskins
Other
__________________
Paintrain's Redskins Fandom
1981-2014

I'm not dead but this team is dead to me...but now that McCloughan is here they may have new life!

Jay Gruden = Zorny McSpurrier
Kirk Cousins = Next Grossman
Paintrain is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 06-24-2008, 12:01 PM   #2
jdlea
Playmaker
 
jdlea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arlington, VA
Age: 40
Posts: 3,109
Re: Why the low expectations from the pre-season mags?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paintrain View Post
With the offseason mags coming out, the consensus seems to be the Redskins will be in last place in the NFC East with anywhere from 4-6 wins. For a playoff team that was one of the hottest teams entering the post season & returning 22 starters, what factors do you think national writers are using?

(Mods-Poll please)
New Coach/System Uncertainty
Everyone else in the division is simply better
We got lucky last year and weren't that good anyways
General disregard for all positive things Redskins
Other

I think those are the two big ones. However, don't know that "we weren't that good." IMO, these team played a bit over their heads down the stretch and that was a direct result of Joe Gibbs being the team's head coach. Because of that, I don't really know what to expect from this next year, they could be anywhere from 6-10 to 12-4 and I wouldn't be totally shocked.

Also, when you look around, this is the toughest division in the league and the Skins (rightly or wrongly) are seen as the biggest question mark. Because of this they face predictions of a mediocre to bad season.
jdlea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2008, 12:05 PM   #3
GTripp0012
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 37
Posts: 15,994
Re: Why the low expectations from the pre-season mags?

When I do vote in this poll, it's going to be flat-out for "Everyone else in the division is simply better".

We really shouldn't be that much better or worse than last year. I don't think 4 wins is very likely at all, because at least four wins is a virtual guarantee. 7 or 8 seems like a better prediction.

And as we all know from experience, it only takes a lucky break or three to turn a 7 win team into a 10-6 division winner.

I know some publications are going to write us off, which gives the potential to give their editors hell in January, but it is what it is. Whatever we can accomplish this season is simply a building block for the future.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2008, 12:16 PM   #4
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 52
Posts: 99,705
Re: Why the low expectations from the pre-season mags?

Preseason predictions are pretty worthless. They usually take last year's finish and recycle that for the predictions. Rarely does anyone go out on a limb. Throw in a new coach and the doubters are out in full force.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2008, 12:37 PM   #5
Monkeydad
Living Legend
 
Monkeydad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PA
Age: 45
Posts: 17,460
Re: Why the low expectations from the pre-season mags?

Because they're talking about the Redskins.

Seriously, the media has always loved to hate our team for some reason.
__________________
Not sent from a Droid, iPhone, Blackberry or toaster
Monkeydad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2008, 01:25 PM   #6
rypper11
The Starter
 
rypper11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 1,228
Re: Why the low expectations from the pre-season mags?

NFC East is the toughest division in the NFC. We'd be a lock to win the South (who wouldn't have a team with more than 7 wins if they played only teams from outside of their division) and would have a good shot to win the West. In the North, who knows what the Packers will be w/o Favre, the Bears have no offense and the Vikings have no passing game at all.
Taking off my homer glasses I still say we are in the top half of teams in the NFC (probably 6 or 7) but three better teams are also in our division.
__________________
Playing a kids game for a kings ransom.
rypper11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2008, 01:26 PM   #7
hooskins
Most Interesting Man in the World
 
hooskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Age: 37
Posts: 8,606
Re: Why the low expectations from the pre-season mags?

I don't mind the doubt because it is well deserved. The Skins have been pretty inconsistent in the last 10+ years so we deserve it. Even the last 3 years, we barely made the cut two of them, and did pretty terrible 1 season.

We need consistency, then the haters will automatically disappear.
__________________
Vacancy
hooskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2008, 01:39 PM   #8
freddyg12
Playmaker
 
freddyg12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,540
Re: Why the low expectations from the pre-season mags?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paintrain View Post
With the offseason mags coming out, the consensus seems to be the Redskins will be in last place in the NFC East with anywhere from 4-6 wins. For a playoff team that was one of the hottest teams entering the post season & returning 22 starters, what factors do you think national writers are using?

(Mods-Poll please)
New Coach/System Uncertainty
Everyone else in the division is simply better
We got lucky last year and weren't that good anyways
General disregard for all positive things Redskins
Other
Add to that a recent history of instability from the top down. They did a lot to keep some continuity, but the media is by & large still miffed that GW didn't get hired.

I thought the g-men would suck last year & through their first 2.5 games, they proved me right. Then they go on a run & win it all. I'm just not convinced they have the team to get back in the playoffs even. plus the super bowl hangover will have a greater impact on Eli, because no one gives him credit for their win, you hear about their d line the most.

Eli is in a make or break year; he might respond confidently or he might still feel a lot of pressure, like he still has something to prove. I think it'll be a tough year for him, and I don't think you can expect Plaxico to be that good again. Shockey could be an issue too.

So I see the g-men in last place in the nfc east w/us in third behind Philly & DAllas.
freddyg12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2008, 01:45 PM   #9
JWsleep
Propane and propane accessories
 
JWsleep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Houston, TX
Age: 55
Posts: 4,719
Re: Why the low expectations from the pre-season mags?

New, untested coach, tough division, questions about JC (it was TC who led the playoff run), etc. Given that Dallas had its best regular season record last year and the gints won it all, you can't place us above them. And we all know that the media is more into the iggles than us. So were last in the toughest division.

But no one knows much right now, especially about the skins. Wake me up when we're actually playing for real.
__________________
Hail from Houston!
JWsleep is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2008, 01:57 PM   #10
Schneed10
A Dude
 
Schneed10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Newtown Square, PA
Age: 45
Posts: 12,435
Re: Why the low expectations from the pre-season mags?

I actually think it's justified. We were good last year, but not great. It took an incredible motivational job by Joe Gibbs to get the team through December after losing Taylor. Collins came in and did a great job, too.

Given that there's big change on offense (totally new passing system), and a change on defense, and given that we don't have that motivating force in Gibbs for the stretch run, I'd say we're more likely to finish below .500 than above it.
__________________
God made certain people to play football. He was one of them.
Schneed10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2008, 02:22 PM   #11
Schneed10
A Dude
 
Schneed10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Newtown Square, PA
Age: 45
Posts: 12,435
Re: Why the low expectations from the pre-season mags?

In other words, I think we have 9-7 or 10-6 personnel, but 7-9 or 6-10 is more realistic because coaching changes simply take time to hash out.

You've got exceptions, of course. Eric Mangini and Sean Payton did darn well in year 1 of their gigs. Hopefully we end up with a first year result like that.
__________________
God made certain people to play football. He was one of them.
Schneed10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2008, 02:38 PM   #12
SouperMeister
Playmaker
 
SouperMeister's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Leesburg, VA
Age: 60
Posts: 3,419
Re: Why the low expectations from the pre-season mags?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paintrain View Post
With the offseason mags coming out, the consensus seems to be the Redskins will be in last place in the NFC East with anywhere from 4-6 wins. For a playoff team that was one of the hottest teams entering the post season & returning 22 starters, what factors do you think national writers are using?

(Mods-Poll please)
Using your list:

New Coach/System Uncertainty
Everyone else in the division is simply better (NFC East is strong throughout)
We got lucky last year and weren't that good anyways
General disregard for all positive things Redskins
Other
SouperMeister is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2008, 02:39 PM   #13
Cowell
Impact Rookie
 
Cowell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Bluffton, South Carolina
Posts: 803
Re: Why the low expectations from the pre-season mags?

Does it really shock anyone that we are placed last in our division? The Cowboys are going to be good, the Eagles have improved tenfold, and the Giants aren't a bad team either. We are the biggest question mark because we have a brand new coaching staff and we are going to run a completely revamped offense.
Cowell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2008, 02:42 PM   #14
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 52
Posts: 99,705
Re: Why the low expectations from the pre-season mags?

Ok, I understand Dallas and NY...

But what have the Eagles done to improve "tenfold"?
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2008, 02:48 PM   #15
SouperMeister
Playmaker
 
SouperMeister's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Leesburg, VA
Age: 60
Posts: 3,419
Re: Why the low expectations from the pre-season mags?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk72 View Post
Ok, I understand Dallas and NY...

But what have the Eagles done to improve "tenfold"?
Certainly they haven't improved tenfold, but Philly will has helped their pass D by adding Samuel at CB (especially if they keep Lito Sheppard around as a nickel). I've always admired their building O-line and D-line depth through the draft, a trend that continued this offseason. Most of all, McNabb will be two years removed from his torn ACL. His mobility was suspect as the beginning of last season, but it was a factor when we met Philly the second time around. As for negatives, they didn't add quality veteran depth at WR, gambling that DeSean Jackson is ready for prime time. Overall, I see Philly in the 9-10 win range, something that will be tough for us to match in year one of a new coach/system.
SouperMeister is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:01 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 1.39581 seconds with 10 queries