Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


RI: JZ and JC

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-03-2008, 07:52 PM   #1
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,464
RI: JZ and JC

Paul Tenorio reports:

Here at the start of the afternoon practice, one of Zorn's quirky quarterback drills has made its first appearance. No, not the slip n' slide, this instead is similar to a drill in the Madden video game training camp mode.

link: JZ and JC (With Afternoon Update) - Redskins Insider
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 05-04-2008, 11:10 AM   #2
skinsqc
Camp Scrub
 
skinsqc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Timberville,VA
Posts: 57
Re: RI: JZ and JC

I just hope it don't take the offense 6 games to get on the same page.
__________________
Mamas dont let your babies grow up to be cowboys.
skinsqc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2008, 12:44 PM   #3
theJBexperience
Impact Rookie
 
theJBexperience's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Boone, NC
Posts: 579
Re: RI: JZ and JC

Good, he had a huge problem sailing balls over open receivers heads last season. Hopefully, this will fix that problem.
theJBexperience is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2008, 01:30 PM   #4
GridIron26
Playmaker
 
GridIron26's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Colorado
Age: 36
Posts: 3,391
Re: RI: JZ and JC

Quote:
Originally Posted by skinsqc View Post
I just hope it don't take the offense 6 games to get on the same page.
Hm I doubt it, it's not lilke Zorn is making a fat playbook, fatter than Saunders' 700 pages playbook..
GridIron26 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2008, 05:26 PM   #5
Longtimefan
Playmaker
 
Longtimefan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Germantown, Md.
Posts: 4,832
Re: RI: JZ and JC

All these drills are obviously designed to help make JC more proficient as a passer, and it will be interesting to see the finished product.

"The Knees Are The Keys" Interesting!!
Longtimefan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2008, 02:09 PM   #6
goredskins1983
Camp Scrub
 
goredskins1983's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 30
Re: RI: JZ and JC

I would rather have Todd Collins start anyways. Granted, he ran an Al Saunders offense that he knew in KC, but he has what it takes to win games and run an offense. his QB rating was about 100, and lead us to 5 straight wins. Its clear Campbell cannot run an offense. He makes too many key mistakes, like the ends of the TB and Dallas games where he threw costly picks. His TD and INT ratio is bad, and his QB rating has been low as well, in the high 70's. The upsetting thing is that his stats show no improvement year to year. We cannot win with him, just look at his record as a starter, its below 500. though collins is old, he really hasnt been banged up much in his career due to being a backup.
goredskins1983 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2008, 02:24 PM   #7
Daseal
Puppy Kicker
 
Daseal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arlington, Virginia
Age: 41
Posts: 8,341
Re: RI: JZ and JC

Goredskins -- this is why the Redskins typically don't draft. Redskins fans are idiots. Jason Campbell is a young QB, he's going to make costly mistakes -- but if he's not in there making them he will not learn. If you want to look at his stats, and their lack of improvement -- I suggest you also look at how long he's been in a system and allowed to grow and learn the nuances of that particular offense. Every year this kid gets a playbook thrown at him, he spends all offseason studying it and working on it.
__________________
Best. Player. Available.
Daseal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2008, 02:49 PM   #8
over the mountain
Playmaker
 
over the mountain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: close to the edge
Posts: 4,926
Re: RI: JZ and JC

nice article, a few years down the road JC is really going to benefit from zorns fundamentals, approach and technique.

daseal - no need to indirectly call the man in idiot. i agree with him that JC does sail the ball more than you like to see, puts the ball behind the receiver so they have to reach back and doesnt see the field well so he locks on his intended receiver the whole time or waits until the receiver is open before getting rid of it.

you cant argue with the fact that collins did show us what a knowledgable on-time good read quarterback looks like last year, granted he knows saunders system about as well as anybody. collins showed us what JC lacks before he can be an elite qb and in some ways showed us just how far he has to go in his development. JC does alot of things well like not being bothered by pressure and keeping his eyes down field and is definetly our QB this year and next year but i agree with people who think he lacks and needs to develop certain other qb intangibles before we will start winning consistently. i am a JC fan and believer, no hate.

go skins!
over the mountain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2008, 02:53 PM   #9
SC Skins Fan
The Starter
 
SC Skins Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 1,555
Re: RI: JZ and JC

Quote:
Originally Posted by goredskins1983 View Post
I would rather have Todd Collins start anyways. Granted, he ran an Al Saunders offense that he knew in KC, but he has what it takes to win games and run an offense. his QB rating was about 100, and lead us to 5 straight wins. Its clear Campbell cannot run an offense. He makes too many key mistakes, like the ends of the TB and Dallas games where he threw costly picks. His TD and INT ratio is bad, and his QB rating has been low as well, in the high 70's. The upsetting thing is that his stats show no improvement year to year. We cannot win with him, just look at his record as a starter, its below 500. though collins is old, he really hasnt been banged up much in his career due to being a backup.
Thank goodness Collins didn't make any mistakes when he was under pressure and forced to try to win a game coming from behind. Oh by the way, I didn't catch the playoff game in Seattle, what happened in that one?
__________________
It has taken a long time, but I have finally realized that nothing I say about the Redskins will have any effect upon anything the Redskins do.
SC Skins Fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2008, 02:54 PM   #10
J. Spanky
Special Teams
 
J. Spanky's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: off the grid
Posts: 192
Re: RI: JZ and JC

Quote:
Originally Posted by Daseal View Post
Goredskins -- this is why the Redskins typically don't draft. Redskins fans are idiots. Jason Campbell is a young QB, he's going to make costly mistakes -- but if he's not in there making them he will not learn. If you want to look at his stats, and their lack of improvement -- I suggest you also look at how long he's been in a system and allowed to grow and learn the nuances of that particular offense. Every year this kid gets a playbook thrown at him, he spends all offseason studying it and working on it.
woah, woah there. i agree with much of what you've said here. but easy on the "redskins fans are idiots" - REDSKIN FAN.

you'd be much more accurate in concluding that many SPORTS fans, or even just people in general, are idiots. there's actually some pretty sensible, knowledgeable fans here.
J. Spanky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2008, 03:02 PM   #11
goredskins1983
Camp Scrub
 
goredskins1983's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 30
Re: RI: JZ and JC

SC Skins fan - even with that shit game in Seattle, he still had a QB rating 20 points higher the Campbell when the season was over.

lets review the stats:
Collins was 5 -1 as a starter
Campbell was 4 -7 as a starter
exactly............its all about wins and losses.
goredskins1983 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2008, 03:07 PM   #12
goredskins1983
Camp Scrub
 
goredskins1983's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 30
Re: RI: JZ and JC

or 4-1
vs 5-7
goredskins1983 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2008, 03:14 PM   #13
johnwayne
Camp Scrub
 
johnwayne's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 49
Re: RI: JZ and JC

todd collins has and will remain a backup....he is a backup, end of story...
johnwayne is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2008, 03:25 PM   #14
SC Skins Fan
The Starter
 
SC Skins Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 1,555
Re: RI: JZ and JC

Quote:
Originally Posted by goredskins1983 View Post
SC Skins fan - even with that shit game in Seattle, he still had a QB rating 20 points higher the Campbell when the season was over.

lets review the stats:
Collins was 5 -1 as a starter
Campbell was 4 -7 as a starter
exactly............its all about wins and losses.
Collins played very well at the end of last year, and I think all Redskins fans will hold a special place for him in their hearts for that (well, as long as he doesn't play anymore and end up playing poorly - see Mark Brunell and fans booing him after he took us to the playoffs in 2005). Now, if you are going to go with your 'it's just about wins' then fine, but I'll make several points.

1) Collins also had the benefit of a healthy Santana Moss, a healthy Clinton Portis, and an O-Line that finally came together a bit. Part of the offensive success was certainly due to Collins, but there were other factors too, let's not forget that.

2) If you want to do a comparison why not look at the last 5 games Jason Campbell played (Philadelphia to Chicago) and compare those to the 5 games that Collins started. That leaves out a couple of the best games Campbell had last year too, but what you see is that Campbell was developing as the year progressed. He had two 300 yard games (Collins had zero), he had another game where he threw 3 tds (Collins never did that), he completed over 60% of his passes in all but the Buffalo game (and we all know what was going on that week), and had more TDs than INTs (albeit 6-5).

3) Even if you wanted to make the case the Collins should start (and you might be the only person on here who would do that) then you are saying you want to go with a 37 year old guy who maybe has two years left, take the team away from Campbell and basically abandon him because it would be tough to come back after that. So in one or two years you'll have to go find another QB ... and those aren't so easy to find. Just ask Chicago.

But welcome tot he board nonetheless.
__________________
It has taken a long time, but I have finally realized that nothing I say about the Redskins will have any effect upon anything the Redskins do.
SC Skins Fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2008, 03:29 PM   #15
dblanch66
The Starter
 
dblanch66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Age: 58
Posts: 1,176
Re: RI: JZ and JC

Quote:
Originally Posted by goredskins1983 View Post
I would rather have Todd Collins start anyways. Granted, he ran an Al Saunders offense that he knew in KC, but he has what it takes to win games and run an offense. his QB rating was about 100, and lead us to 5 straight wins. Its clear Campbell cannot run an offense. He makes too many key mistakes, like the ends of the TB and Dallas games where he threw costly picks. His TD and INT ratio is bad, and his QB rating has been low as well, in the high 70's. The upsetting thing is that his stats show no improvement year to year. We cannot win with him, just look at his record as a starter, its below 500. though collins is old, he really hasnt been banged up much in his career due to being a backup.
__________________
The eyes are the groin of the head
dblanch66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:15 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 2.90140 seconds with 10 queries