If We Had No Injuries What Would Our Record Be?

LaRon + Sean = Hell 4 U · 11-15-2007, 11:53 AM

I'm thinking 8-1 and the Patriots game would have been a lot closer more like NE 35 WAS 21. I think Portis might have had 1,000 yards already with Jansen & Thomas. Just thinking all loud what do y'all think?

Daseal · 11-15-2007, 11:57 AM

Assuming the teams we play have no injuries. Roughly the same. Would have won some we lost, may have lost some we won. We're a .500 type team give or take a game or two. I don't understand the love for Jansen. Hes been a great player for years for the skins, but I just don't think he's the Jon Jansen of old. If I had to guess, I'd guess he'll never start for the Redskins again.

Stacks42 · 11-15-2007, 11:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LaRon + Sean = Hell 4 U

I'm thinking 8-1 and the Patriots game would have been a lot closer more like NE 35 WAS 21. I think Portis might have had 1,000 yards already with Jansen & Thomas. Just thinking all loud what do y'all think?

I agree we would have had a much better record, but you gotta roll with the punches. Also im not sure about Portis' numbers.... him sitting out the pre-season really hurt his game. I expect that if Gibbs is around next year he wont allow the players to "work out" on their own.

BleedBurgundy · 11-15-2007, 12:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Daseal

I don't understand the love for Jansen. Hes been a great player for years for the skins, but I just don't think he's the Jon Jansen of old. If I had to guess, I'd guess he'll never start for the Redskins again.

Exactly. He hasn't been a top RT for at least 3 years. If doesn't ever start again, he'll have a good career in TV. He's always been solid on anything I've seen him on.

LaRon + Sean = Hell 4 U · 11-15-2007, 12:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Daseal

Assuming the teams we play have no injuries. Roughly the same. Would have won some we lost, may have lost some we won. We're a .500 type team give or take a game or two. I don't understand the love for Jansen. Hes been a great player for years for the skins, but I just don't think he's the Jon Jansen of old. If I had to guess, I'd guess he'll never start for the Redskins again.

Really? I thought he was a very good tackle. I don't see him losing his job to a injury thought.

BleedBurgundy · 11-15-2007, 12:09 PM

I think you could argue that Dallas and NE have been among the most injury free teams this year. Maybe we have 2 more wins at this point and a lot better chance in the remaining contests.

MTK · 11-15-2007, 12:12 PM

Jansen still has some productive years left. He'll be back in the starting lineup next year. Bank on it.

BleedBurgundy · 11-15-2007, 12:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mattyk72

Jansen still has some productive years left. He'll be back in the starting lineup next year. Bank on it.

He'll definitely be back next year, if he's physically capable. We don't have anyone better. But I don't think he's the same player he was a few years back.

LaRon + Sean = Hell 4 U · 11-15-2007, 12:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mattyk72

Jansen still has some productive years left. He'll be back in the starting lineup next year. Bank on it.

True enough he is old but look at guys like Larry Allen still playing still top notch at his position he has 2-4 at least in him.

MTK · 11-15-2007, 12:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BleedBurgundy

He'll definitely be back next year, if he's physically capable. We don't have anyone better. But I don't think he's the same player he was a few years back.

No he's not the same, but he's still a quality RT.

I'll admit I was wrong on Wade. I thought he would fill in for Jansen and we wouldn't miss a beat. From what I've seen of Wade so far I've concluded Jansen is clearly the better player. Sorry Jon, I was wrong to doubt you!

SouperMeister · 11-15-2007, 12:21 PM

8-1 or 7-2. As for Jansen, he's MUCH better than Wade. He played a great game on an ailing calf against Julius Peppers last year. The one guy who seems to own him the last few years is Strahan, but there's a long list of RT's that Strahan has dominated.

LaRon + Sean = Hell 4 U · 11-15-2007, 12:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mattyk72

No he's not the same, but he's still a quality RT.

I'll admit I was wrong on Wade. I thought he would fill in for Jansen and we wouldn't miss a beat. From what I've seen of Wade so far I've concluded Jansen is clearly the better player. Sorry Jon, I was wrong to doubt you!

What is the update on Stephon Heyer and his injury? I felt he did a lot better than Wade myself.

MTK · 11-15-2007, 12:23 PM

Heyer is still too much of a liability if you ask me. When he's in the game a TE almost always has to stay in and help.

LaRon + Sean = Hell 4 U · 11-15-2007, 12:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mattyk72

Heyer is still too much of a liability if you ask me. When he's in the game a TE almost always has to stay in and help.

I was sold on his performance against Jason Taylor week 1 to be just thrown in the fire and have to perform was great for him and our team

chrisl4064 · 11-15-2007, 12:43 PM

maybe 6-3 at best.

11-15-2007, 11:53 AM	#1
LaRon + Sean = Hell 4 U No new threads for you Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Moneytown Posts: 127	If We Had No Injuries What Would Our Record Be? I'm thinking 8-1 and the Patriots game would have been a lot closer more like NE 35 WAS 21. I think Portis might have had 1,000 yards already with Jansen & Thomas. Just thinking all loud what do y'all think?

11-15-2007, 11:57 AM	#2
Daseal Puppy Kicker Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Arlington, Virginia Age: 42 Posts: 8,341	Re: If We Had No Injuries What Would Our Record Be? Assuming the teams we play have no injuries. Roughly the same. Would have won some we lost, may have lost some we won. We're a .500 type team give or take a game or two. I don't understand the love for Jansen. Hes been a great player for years for the skins, but I just don't think he's the Jon Jansen of old. If I had to guess, I'd guess he'll never start for the Redskins again. __________________ Best. Player. Available.

11-15-2007, 12:09 PM	#6
BleedBurgundy Playmaker Join Date: Feb 2004 Posts: 4,471	Re: If We Had No Injuries What Would Our Record Be? I think you could argue that Dallas and NE have been among the most injury free teams this year. Maybe we have 2 more wins at this point and a lot better chance in the remaining contests. __________________ "All natural institutions of churches, whether Jewish, Christian, or Turkish, appear to me no other than human inventions, set up to terrify and enslave mankind, and monopolize power and profit." Thomas Paine

11-15-2007, 12:12 PM	#7
MTK \m/ Join Date: Feb 2004 Age: 52 Posts: 99,731	Re: If We Had No Injuries What Would Our Record Be? Jansen still has some productive years left. He'll be back in the starting lineup next year. Bank on it. __________________ Support The Warpath! \| Warpath Shop

11-15-2007, 12:21 PM	#11
SouperMeister Playmaker Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Leesburg, VA Age: 60 Posts: 3,419	Re: If We Had No Injuries What Would Our Record Be? 8-1 or 7-2. As for Jansen, he's MUCH better than Wade. He played a great game on an ailing calf against Julius Peppers last year. The one guy who seems to own him the last few years is Strahan, but there's a long list of RT's that Strahan has dominated.

11-15-2007, 12:23 PM	#13
MTK \m/ Join Date: Feb 2004 Age: 52 Posts: 99,731	Re: If We Had No Injuries What Would Our Record Be? Heyer is still too much of a liability if you ask me. When he's in the game a TE almost always has to stay in and help. __________________ Support The Warpath! \| Warpath Shop

11-15-2007, 12:43 PM	#15
chrisl4064 Registered User Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: Lake Travis, Texas Age: 43 Posts: 786	Re: If We Had No Injuries What Would Our Record Be? maybe 6-3 at best.

If We Had No Injuries What Would Our Record Be?

Locker Room Main Forum