Ok, I don't care if its for depth...we cant have Stinkston!

paulskinsfan · 08-13-2007, 05:35 PM

GTripp0012 · 08-13-2007, 05:38 PM

Well, if we were looking at a way to have James Thrash not be the No. 2 receiver, just remember that the last time Todd Pinkston held such a role, Thrash was the No. 1 receiver.

Pinkston is garbage. Lloyd's probably better. TP won't make the cut.

EARTHQUAKE2689 · 08-13-2007, 05:38 PM

All I have to say is WHY?

GTripp0012 · 08-13-2007, 05:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by EARTHQUAKE2689

All I have to say is WHY?

They will torture us with irrelivant news until we give up!

He can...longsnap well, I guess. Albright has competition!

BleedBurgundy · 08-13-2007, 05:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by EARTHQUAKE2689

All I have to say is WHY?

Because playing for us is the only way he doesn't have to worry about #21 on gameday.

wilsowilso · 08-13-2007, 05:45 PM

I would rather they just sign Art Monk or Gark Clark.

FRPLG · 08-13-2007, 05:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wilsowilso

I would rather they just sign Art Monk or Gark Clark.

Seriously. Hell, sign Charley Taylor instead of this dead weight.

djnemo65 · 08-13-2007, 05:50 PM

Even if there's still a need there has to be someone better than Stinkston still out there.

freddyg12 · 08-13-2007, 06:04 PM

you think Bradford is looking that bad?

dmek25 · 08-13-2007, 06:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by djnemo65

Even if there's still a need there has to be someone better than Stinkston still out there.

why would they think there was a need? I'm not big on Mike Espy, but i would rather have him

Meks · 08-13-2007, 06:19 PM

retarted.

firstdown · 08-13-2007, 06:20 PM

Well here it is from the skins site and they signed a DT today.

SmootSmack · 08-13-2007, 06:20 PM

This doesn't help Campbell if he has to keep adjusting to new WRs. I understand the whole preseason depth/camp fodder argument. But I'd rather they just focus on repitition of the plays and formations with El, Moss, Thrash, and Espy (and Lloyd when he's healthy which better be damn soon). Those are going to be your guys at the start of the season. And if they're not, and it's Bradford and Pinkston, then we have a problem.

I gotta say though Espy did not look good Saturday

chrisl13 · 08-13-2007, 06:21 PM

Hmmmm, I dont know why they signed him. A waste of a roster spot.

That Guy · 08-13-2007, 06:22 PM

he sucks... but he might still be better than lloyd

08-13-2007, 05:35 PM	#1
paulskinsfan Registered User Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: West VA Posts: 726	Ok, I don't care if its for depth...we cant have Stinkston! Redskins Insider

08-13-2007, 05:38 PM	#3
EARTHQUAKE2689 You did WHAT?!? Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: In The Kitchen With Dyna. Age: 36 Posts: 14,170	Re: Ok, I don't care if its for depth...we cant have Stinkston! All I have to say is WHY? __________________ https://open.spotify.com/artist/1NG9zNxqMP8cYNP72QqUQT Shameless self-promotion. It is what it is.

08-13-2007, 05:45 PM	#6
wilsowilso Registered User Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Los Angeles Age: 51 Posts: 2,841	Re: Ok, I don't care if its for depth...we cant have Stinkston! I would rather they just sign Art Monk or Gark Clark.

08-13-2007, 05:50 PM	#8
djnemo65 Playmaker Join Date: May 2004 Posts: 2,836	Re: Ok, I don't care if its for depth...we cant have Stinkston! Even if there's still a need there has to be someone better than Stinkston still out there.

08-13-2007, 06:04 PM	#9
freddyg12 Playmaker Join Date: Feb 2006 Posts: 4,540	Re: Ok, I don't care if its for depth...we cant have Stinkston! you think Bradford is looking that bad?

08-13-2007, 05:38 PM	#2
GTripp0012 Living Legend Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Evanston, IL Age: 37 Posts: 15,994	Re: Ok, I don't care if its for depth...we cant have Stinkston! Well, if we were looking at a way to have James Thrash not be the No. 2 receiver, just remember that the last time Todd Pinkston held such a role, Thrash was the No. 1 receiver. Pinkston is garbage. Lloyd's probably better. TP won't make the cut.

08-13-2007, 06:19 PM	#11
Meks Pro Bowl Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: South Jersey Age: 39 Posts: 5,715	Re: Ok, I don't care if its for depth...we cant have Stinkston! retarted.

08-13-2007, 06:20 PM	#12
firstdown Living Legend Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: chesapeake, va Age: 60 Posts: 15,817	Re: Ok, I don't care if its for depth...we cant have Stinkston! Well here it is from the skins site and they signed a DT today.

08-13-2007, 06:20 PM	#13
SmootSmack Uncle Phil Join Date: Feb 2004 Posts: 45,256	Re: Ok, I don't care if its for depth...we cant have Stinkston! This doesn't help Campbell if he has to keep adjusting to new WRs. I understand the whole preseason depth/camp fodder argument. But I'd rather they just focus on repitition of the plays and formations with El, Moss, Thrash, and Espy (and Lloyd when he's healthy which better be damn soon). Those are going to be your guys at the start of the season. And if they're not, and it's Bradford and Pinkston, then we have a problem. I gotta say though Espy did not look good Saturday __________________ You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You

08-13-2007, 06:21 PM	#14
chrisl13 Special Teams Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: 2 Minutes away from Fedex Field, Maryland Posts: 363	Re: Ok, I don't care if its for depth...we cant have Stinkston! Hmmmm, I dont know why they signed him. A waste of a roster spot.

08-13-2007, 06:22 PM	#15
That Guy Living Legend Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: VA Age: 42 Posts: 17,561	Re: Ok, I don't care if its for depth...we cant have Stinkston! he sucks... but he might still be better than lloyd

Ok, I don't care if its for depth...we cant have Stinkston!

Locker Room Main Forum