![]() |
|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#1 |
\m/
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 52
Posts: 99,741
|
Scouts Inc. TE rankings
Link: http://insider.espn.go.com/nfl/insid...ory?id=2923211
14. Washington Redskins Chris Cooley has scored 13 times and averaged 64 receptions (12 yards per catch) over the past two seasons. He led the team in receptions in 2006 and showed his athleticism with a 6-yard touchdown scamper versus the Carolina Panthers. Cooley is light on his feet and has become an efficient route runner, finding voids in short and intermediate zones. He is sure-handed and displays power and quickness after the catch. Cooley is a solid blocker at the point, but his lack of height hinders his ability to get leverage on the edge. The Redskins have veteran Todd Yoder (a career backup) who has not been a factor as a receiver. Third-year player Eric Edwards was recently acquired from the Cardinals and may give Redskins QB Jason Campbell more options in the passing game. |
![]() |
![]() |
Advertisements |
![]() |
#2 |
MVP
Join Date: May 2005
Location: washington, D.C.
Posts: 11,460
|
Re: Scouts Inc. TE rankings
Eric Edwards? Are you kidding me? Who the f** is Eric Edwards?!
I maintain, I'll take Warpath over 95% of the talking heads. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
The Starter
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: So. MD
Age: 46
Posts: 1,319
|
Re: Scouts Inc. TE rankings
14th is a bit low. I understand that there's a huge dropoff in talent after Cooley, but the same can be said for eight out of the top ten rated teams. And you'd think Kellen Winslow would have to show some sort of consistency before he's gushed over to the extent he is in that article...
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
MVP
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: lancaster,pa
Age: 63
Posts: 10,672
|
Re: Scouts Inc. TE rankings
while i think im not as high on cooley as some around here, he is definitely a top 5 tight end
__________________
"It's better to be quiet and thought a fool than to open ones mouth and remove all doubt." courtesy of 53fan |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
The Starter
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,363
|
Re: Scouts Inc. TE rankings
Dmek I think Cooley is great but he isn't top 5 top 10 sure but what they rank here is team dept
Top 5 TE Gates, Antonio Gonzalez, Tony Crumpler, Alge Witten, Jason Shockey, Jeremy with Heap, T comming six and Cooley seventh in my book behind him you have Winslow and V. Davis just because of potential |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Wildcard Bitches
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Bethesda, MD
Age: 39
Posts: 2,638
|
Re: Scouts Inc. TE rankings
Quote:
__________________
This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Alps! |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
MVP
Join Date: May 2005
Location: washington, D.C.
Posts: 11,460
|
Re: Scouts Inc. TE rankings
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 37
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Scouts Inc. TE rankings
Quote:
Witten has a very different game than Cooley. Very smart player. It's all about personal preference at TE, but I don't think Witten's skill set is too much different than your run of the mill TE. Certainly in my mind inferior to Cooley's. I don't think I could make an argument for Cooley over the other 3, (Save of course, "YAC is really REALLY important". It is.) Crumpler's a better blocker, and the other two have really had off the hook production. I think you are underrating Heap a bit (and obviously Cooley), but its no biggie. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Wildcard Bitches
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Bethesda, MD
Age: 39
Posts: 2,638
|
Re: Scouts Inc. TE rankings
I originally posted that I hated Shockey, and that he was over-rated.
But pulled up his stats and they're pretty fuggin good.
__________________
This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Alps! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 37
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Scouts Inc. TE rankings
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arlington, VA
Age: 40
Posts: 3,109
|
Re: Scouts Inc. TE rankings
Quote:
As for Crumpler, as the primary target of his QB, it's a little unfair to compare the 2. I'd be interested to see a scenario in which Cooley were the primary target (just to see where his production would be, however, I don't wish injury on all the wide outs). |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 37
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Scouts Inc. TE rankings
Quote:
That doesn't mean a whole lot to me. I want better than expected production from my TE position. Shockey doesn't bring that. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 | |
Wildcard Bitches
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Bethesda, MD
Age: 39
Posts: 2,638
|
Re: Scouts Inc. TE rankings
Quote:
He's done it for longer, and he's fairly consistent. Does he drop balls, yes. But he's still a good tight end. Bastard, yes, talented... definitely.
__________________
This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Alps! |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 37
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Scouts Inc. TE rankings
Quote:
If he gets more passes thrown at him than Cooley, hes going to get more yards (unless the talent discrepancy is crazy). That doesn't tell us enough about the player. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
The Starter
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,363
|
Re: Scouts Inc. TE rankings
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|