Conf. Championship on neutral site?

skinsWill · 05-24-2007, 05:26 PM

I wanted to post this in here bc. i looked everywhere and could find a link to prove it. I heard on Total Access that the leauge could be considering playing conf. championship games on neutral sites like the super bowl, taking away any "homefeild advantage". I cant believe they are even CONSIDERING doing this!! I mean its bad enough you take weather out of the superbowl but the Conf championships too? this is rediculous i wanted to make sure that everyone felt this way... I cant even come up with 1 REAL advantage for doing this.

Gmanc711 · 05-25-2007, 01:09 PM

That would be maybe the worst thing ever. If this is true, for every good thing Godell has done so far, he seems to have another idea that just makes me want to clock him.

MTK · 05-25-2007, 01:14 PM

Horrible idea if it's true.

ArtMonkDrillz · 05-25-2007, 01:17 PM

So that would mean that your reward for ending the regular season with the best record in your conference would be a single home playoff game and a slightly nicer locker room in one of about 6 possible sites for the championship game. Sounds like a really swell plan, Rog.

ArtMonkDrillz · 05-25-2007, 01:35 PM

I feel like this rule would probably also favor the NFC in terms of useable sites a bit too much to be fair to the rest of the league.

Assuming that the championship games are played at sites that represent the conference, meaning that you won't have the NFC game in an AFC city, there are more possible sites for the NFC to use. This is also assuming you want to try to eliminate the weather as a factor, like they do with the Super Bowl.
For the NFC the following teams' stadiums could host: Arizona, Atlanta, Dallas (once the new stadium is built), Detroit, Minnesota, New Orleans, St. Louis, and Tampa Bay.
For the AFC you have: San Diego, Indy, Houston, Miami, and Jacksonville.

I don't know if this is a big deal, but I would think that it's something they have to consider.
Of course the new commissioner's office will probably just schedule all playoff games and the Super Bowl in other countries by the year 2014, so then it won't really matter at all.

saden1 · 05-25-2007, 01:55 PM

In principle this is not a bad idea because home field advantage gives teams such a huge advantage. And if you're approaching the game as a championship game then you should play it on a neutral site. I think you'll most certainly separate the really good teams and those that just get by. The only thing I don't like about it is that the home team fans won't be able to go to the game easily.

EARTHQUAKE2689 · 05-25-2007, 02:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gmanc711

That would be maybe the worst thing ever. If this is true, for every good thing Godell has done so far, he seems to have another idea that just makes me want to clock him.

that is bascially what i was thinking

70Chip · 05-25-2007, 02:20 PM

Horrible idea.

skinsfan_nn · 05-25-2007, 02:37 PM

No way! I hope that NEVER happens! Talk about robbin the fans!

Mc2guy · 05-25-2007, 02:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by saden1

In principle this is not a bad idea because home field advantage gives teams such a huge advantage. And if you're approaching the game as a championship game then you should play it on a neutral site. I think you'll most certainly separate the really good teams and those that just get by. The only thing I don't like about it is that the home team fans won't be able to go to the game easily.

Isn't it the point to get homefield advantage when you have the better record? What incentive does a team have to even show up for games if they have zero incentive to win after clinching their division? Imagine a team from a bad conference who has the division won by week 11 or 12. They would have 4 games with no incentive to play to win outside of pride. That makes no sense to me whatsoever.

Monkeydad · 05-25-2007, 02:54 PM

Stupid idea...it would erase any rewards for having a better season than your opponent.

It would probably take away a week or 2 of good games at the end of the regular season. A team that has clinched a playoff berth still plays for home field advantage. Under the proposed plan, they'd have nothing to play for and just rest everyone earlier than ever before.

jbcjr14 · 05-25-2007, 03:12 PM

I am pretty sure the owner's would shoot this one down pretty quick. Not a very good idea.

saden1 · 05-25-2007, 04:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mc2guy

Isn't it the point to get homefield advantage when you have the better record? What incentive does a team have to even show up for games if they have zero incentive to win after clinching their division? Imagine a team from a bad conference who has the division won by week 11 or 12. They would have 4 games with no incentive to play to win outside of pride. That makes no sense to me whatsoever.

If winning the SB isn't enough of an incentive I don't know what is. The only teams that have the luxury of sitting their players right now are those who already have 12+ wins and have already clinched a bye week...and often times these teams do in fact sit their players out which kinda washes the argument that teams will get complacent and not play towards the end of the season. The first round bye week is a huge incentive to make sure you win more games than the rest of your conference.

All I'm saying is there is a huge deal of strategy involved if the championship game was played in the neutral site too. Also, this kind of structure works for the NCAA so I don't see how it's a totally bad thing.

saden1 · 05-25-2007, 04:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buster

Stupid idea...it would erase any rewards for having a better season than your opponent.

It would probably take away a week or 2 of good games at the end of the regular season. A team that has clinched a playoff berth still plays for home field advantage. Under the proposed plan, they'd have nothing to play for and just rest everyone earlier than ever before.

The last two weeks of the season have alway been about teams trying to make the playoffs or those who are trying to clinch a first round bye week. I don't see the excitement of the last two weeks going away if the conf. championship game is played at a neutral site.

firstdown · 05-25-2007, 04:23 PM

Your making this out to be more than it is. Every year they shoot around a bunch of ideas to see what the owners think about them. Then out of all these ideas maybe a couple will take hold and will get talked about for a couple of years then fade out or get voted on. These guys are just making news, I could here one of the owners suggest this as the other owners boo and laugh at them.

05-24-2007, 05:26 PM	#1
skinsWill Special Teams Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Cow-pukes Country Age: 41 Posts: 191	Conf. Championship on neutral site? I wanted to post this in here bc. i looked everywhere and could find a link to prove it. I heard on Total Access that the leauge could be considering playing conf. championship games on neutral sites like the super bowl, taking away any "homefeild advantage". I cant believe they are even CONSIDERING doing this!! I mean its bad enough you take weather out of the superbowl but the Conf championships too? this is rediculous i wanted to make sure that everyone felt this way... I cant even come up with 1 REAL advantage for doing this.

05-25-2007, 01:09 PM	#2
Gmanc711 Thank You, Sean. Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Gaithersburg, MD Age: 39 Posts: 7,506	Re: Conf. Championship on neutral site? That would be maybe the worst thing ever. If this is true, for every good thing Godell has done so far, he seems to have another idea that just makes me want to clock him. __________________ #21

05-25-2007, 01:14 PM	#3
MTK \m/ Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: NY Age: 52 Posts: 99,465	Re: Conf. Championship on neutral site? Horrible idea if it's true. __________________ Support The Warpath! \| Warpath Shop

05-25-2007, 01:17 PM	#4
ArtMonkDrillz Franchise Player Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Ellicott City, MD Age: 42 Posts: 8,029	Re: Conf. Championship on neutral site? So that would mean that your reward for ending the regular season with the best record in your conference would be a single home playoff game and a slightly nicer locker room in one of about 6 possible sites for the championship game. Sounds like a really swell plan, Rog. __________________ "Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man." The Dude

05-25-2007, 01:35 PM	#5
ArtMonkDrillz Franchise Player Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Ellicott City, MD Age: 42 Posts: 8,029	Re: Conf. Championship on neutral site? I feel like this rule would probably also favor the NFC in terms of useable sites a bit too much to be fair to the rest of the league. Assuming that the championship games are played at sites that represent the conference, meaning that you won't have the NFC game in an AFC city, there are more possible sites for the NFC to use. This is also assuming you want to try to eliminate the weather as a factor, like they do with the Super Bowl. For the NFC the following teams' stadiums could host: Arizona, Atlanta, Dallas (once the new stadium is built), Detroit, Minnesota, New Orleans, St. Louis, and Tampa Bay. For the AFC you have: San Diego, Indy, Houston, Miami, and Jacksonville. I don't know if this is a big deal, but I would think that it's something they have to consider. Of course the new commissioner's office will probably just schedule all playoff games and the Super Bowl in other countries by the year 2014, so then it won't really matter at all. __________________ "Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man." The Dude

05-25-2007, 01:55 PM	#6
saden1 MVP Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Seattle Age: 45 Posts: 10,069	Re: Conf. Championship on neutral site? In principle this is not a bad idea because home field advantage gives teams such a huge advantage. And if you're approaching the game as a championship game then you should play it on a neutral site. I think you'll most certainly separate the really good teams and those that just get by. The only thing I don't like about it is that the home team fans won't be able to go to the game easily. __________________ "The Redskins have always suffered from chronic organizational deformities under Snyder." -Jenkins

05-25-2007, 02:20 PM	#8
70Chip Playmaker Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Manassas Age: 53 Posts: 3,048	Re: Conf. Championship on neutral site? Horrible idea. __________________ This Monkey's Gone to Heaven

05-25-2007, 02:37 PM	#9
skinsfan_nn Playmaker Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: Newport News,Virginia Age: 60 Posts: 4,495	Re: Conf. Championship on neutral site? No way! I hope that NEVER happens! Talk about robbin the fans! __________________ "There's no greater feeling than moving a man from Point A to Point B, against his will." #68 THANKS COACH GIBBS FOR EVERYTHING! YOUR THE MAN AND ALWAYS WILL BE!

05-25-2007, 02:54 PM	#11
Monkeydad Living Legend Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: PA Age: 45 Posts: 17,460	Re: Conf. Championship on neutral site? Stupid idea...it would erase any rewards for having a better season than your opponent. It would probably take away a week or 2 of good games at the end of the regular season. A team that has clinched a playoff berth still plays for home field advantage. Under the proposed plan, they'd have nothing to play for and just rest everyone earlier than ever before.

05-25-2007, 03:12 PM	#12
jbcjr14 The Starter Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Austin, Texas Age: 54 Posts: 2,015	Re: Conf. Championship on neutral site? I am pretty sure the owner's would shoot this one down pretty quick. Not a very good idea. __________________ "Work Harder: millions on welfare are counting on you" - Obama 2009 address to Congress.

05-25-2007, 04:23 PM	#15
firstdown Living Legend Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: chesapeake, va Age: 60 Posts: 15,817	Re: Conf. Championship on neutral site? Your making this out to be more than it is. Every year they shoot around a bunch of ideas to see what the owners think about them. Then out of all these ideas maybe a couple will take hold and will get talked about for a couple of years then fade out or get voted on. These guys are just making news, I could here one of the owners suggest this as the other owners boo and laugh at them.

Conf. Championship on neutral site?

Locker Room Main Forum