![]() |
|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
View Poll Results: How well did Brunell play against the Cowboys? | |||
Great |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
14 | 8.81% |
Good |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
48 | 30.19% |
Average |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
81 | 50.94% |
Sub-Par |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
12 | 7.55% |
Horrible |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
4 | 2.52% |
Voters: 159. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#1 |
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 45
Posts: 8,317
|
Give Props to Brunell
You have to give props to Mark Brunell. He made some nice deep passes over the middle, distributing the ball nicely between Thrash, Lloyd, Cooley, ARE, Sellers, Betts, and Portis.
|
![]() |
![]() |
Advertisements |
![]() |
#2 |
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: I'm in LA, trick!
Posts: 8,700
|
Re: Give Props to Brunell
Um, no....
He threw passes that were too close to being picked off. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
\m/
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 52
Posts: 99,741
|
Re: Give Props to Brunell
Yeah with no Moss I thought he did a pretty good job. With the defense playing better... not great but better, he showed that he can still get it done. Gotta give the OL some props too, they protected him pretty well.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Most Interesting Man in the World
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Age: 37
Posts: 8,606
|
Re: Give Props to Brunell
Props to Brunell.
You couldn't be more incorrect Rat.
__________________
Vacancy |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
\m/
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 52
Posts: 99,741
|
Re: Give Props to Brunell
Quote:
Dude seriously, let it go for 1 week. Is that too much to ask? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 528
|
Re: Give Props to Brunell
Dude what are you talking about. Brunnel clearly showed he is the problem on offense. Cowboys should have picked him off twice. Plus, his movement in the pocket is terrible.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
\m/
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 52
Posts: 99,741
|
Re: Give Props to Brunell
The bashers are NOT going to take over this thread. We won, so please shut up for 1 week.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Most Interesting Man in the World
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Age: 37
Posts: 8,606
|
Re: Give Props to Brunell
Matty, seriously let it go. These people are just really stubborn.
__________________
Vacancy |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 45
Posts: 8,317
|
Re: Give Props to Brunell
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 42
Posts: 17,574
|
Re: Give Props to Brunell
he played much better today and the defense tackled better as well. we still barely beat them though and our OL wasn't looking so hot
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 | |
\m/
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 52
Posts: 99,741
|
Re: Give Props to Brunell
Quote:
You're being nice. Very nice. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 45
Posts: 8,317
|
Re: Give Props to Brunell
Brunell only had 191 yards, but he should have had close to 250. Cooley dropped a 20+ yard play and Lloyd's 37 yard catch was negated by a bogus holding call on Fauria.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Most Interesting Man in the World
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Age: 37
Posts: 8,606
|
Re: Give Props to Brunell
I mean Brunell played a very good game, and yet they are talking trash.
If our D held up, we would have crushed the Boys. Apparently they fail to see the problems with our D. Remember, jedi mindtricks?
__________________
Vacancy |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
\m/
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 52
Posts: 99,741
|
Re: Give Props to Brunell
I know what you meant, I was saying that stubborn is too nice of a term to describe the bashers.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 42
Posts: 17,574
|
Re: Give Props to Brunell
those refs shouldn't have those jobs. the first half had about 10 questionable calls/no-calls and they weren't consistent.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|