Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Antwaan Randle El

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-23-2006, 11:58 AM   #1
SKINS73
Special Teams
 
SKINS73's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Harrisburg, PA
Posts: 190
Antwaan Randle El

I know I've mentioned this in a couple of threads but I figured I'd start a new one to debate the issue. What if we tried Randle El at QB? His college resume isn't too bad and when things break down in the pocket he could make something happen. I pulled this from wikipedia:

He finished his college career as the fifth on the all-time NCAA total yardage list, and became the first player in college football history to record 2,500 total yards for four consecutive years. He finished his career with 7,469 passing yards, 3,895 rushing yards, and 86 touchdowns running and passing. He is considered to be the 2nd most statistically productive dual-threat quarterback to ever play college football.
SKINS73 is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 09-23-2006, 12:11 PM   #2
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,464
Re: Antwaan Randle El

You mean full-time??

Not gonna happen.

There's a reason why he wasn't drafted as a QB. He's undersized, he really doesn't have the arm, and his talents are better utilized at WR.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2006, 12:16 PM   #3
dmek25
MVP
 
dmek25's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: lancaster,pa
Age: 63
Posts: 10,672
Re: Antwaan Randle El

i am not ready for him to take over at qb full time. but i am ready for alittle trickery from the offense
__________________
"It's better to be quiet and thought a fool than to open ones mouth and remove all doubt."
courtesy of 53fan
dmek25 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2006, 12:18 PM   #4
SKINS73
Special Teams
 
SKINS73's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Harrisburg, PA
Posts: 190
Re: Antwaan Randle El

Not full time but like a change up for something like a no huddle series. That would have to throw any defense off balance.
SKINS73 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2006, 12:18 PM   #5
Beemnseven
Pro Bowl
 
Beemnseven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Virginia Beach
Age: 50
Posts: 5,311
Re: Antwaan Randle El

Maybe it's not a good idea to add this type of dimension to what is already considered a confusing offense, but I would like to see Randle El start taking a few snaps just to change things up -- not full time, mind you.

Just have him do what they've got Vick doing in Atlanta with great success. Get under center, fake to Portis, do some misdirection plays and QB draws here and there.

I can only assume Saunders has a few of these up his sleeve for later on. Right now though, running the basic stuff seems to have Brunell and others mystified.
Beemnseven is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2006, 12:24 PM   #6
SKINS73
Special Teams
 
SKINS73's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Harrisburg, PA
Posts: 190
Re: Antwaan Randle El

I watched him live when Penn State played Indiana and he has some insane moves. To use him only as a wide receiver is a travesty. I'm sure the Redskins have other plans for him, but can you imagine him under center faking a reverse to moss and running around the edge?
SKINS73 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2006, 11:47 PM   #7
pg86
No new threads for you
 
pg86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,959
Re: Antwaan Randle El

Kordell Steward was a reciver and then did very well as a QB.....So why not try Randle El at it?!?
pg86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2006, 11:56 PM   #8
vaoutlaws2006
Impact Rookie
 
vaoutlaws2006's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Fayettenam, NC
Age: 52
Posts: 806
Re: Antwaan Randle El

he would be good at that shotgun option that atlanta uses with mike vick. but outside of some trickery i dont see that as a viable qb to use full time.
__________________
The future is obviously right now!
vaoutlaws2006 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2006, 12:01 AM   #9
Schneed10
A Dude
 
Schneed10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Newtown Square, PA
Age: 45
Posts: 12,421
Re: Antwaan Randle El

This thread is absurd.
__________________
God made certain people to play football. He was one of them.
Schneed10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2006, 01:47 AM   #10
Daseal
Puppy Kicker
 
Daseal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arlington, Virginia
Age: 41
Posts: 8,341
Re: Antwaan Randle El

While I think the occassional play or two, or even drive (defenses game plan on certain QBs, that would certainly be unexpected) but not full time.
__________________
Best. Player. Available.
Daseal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2006, 05:49 AM   #11
Darrell_Green_28
The Starter
 
Darrell_Green_28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Robert, Louisiana
Age: 56
Posts: 2,119
Re: Antwaan Randle El

Quote:
Originally Posted by pg86 View Post
Kordell Steward was a reciver and then did very well as a QB.....So why not try Randle El at it?!?
Kordell Stewart did well? now thats funny.
Darrell_Green_28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2006, 06:00 AM   #12
Monk-Fan
Special Teams
 
Monk-Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Abilene, Texas
Posts: 151
Re: Antwaan Randle El

Why would we use Randel El? If i remember right (being sarcastic) we drafted a QB and he is sitting on the bench, if we are going to play anyone else at QB it should be the one we will build our future around.
Monk-Fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2006, 09:14 AM   #13
That Guy
Living Legend
 
That Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 42
Posts: 17,553
Re: Antwaan Randle El

is this serious?

his arm is weak, he's incredibly short (which means lots of tipped balls and inaccurate throws since he can't see the field well), and he's not that accurate either. yeah, he had a good throw in the SB, but get real. trick plays usually leave someone wide open, so his throws thusfar have generally been into zero coverage.
That Guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2006, 09:59 AM   #14
SKINS73
Special Teams
 
SKINS73's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Harrisburg, PA
Posts: 190
Re: Antwaan Randle El

Quote:
Originally Posted by Monk-Fan View Post
Why would we use Randel El? If i remember right (being sarcastic) we drafted a QB and he is sitting on the bench, if we are going to play anyone else at QB it should be the one we will build our future around.

Don't use him as a franchise or permanent solution. But how confused would Jacksonville or Houston be if we started the game, no huddle, shotgun with Randle El under center? If our quarterback can't get him the ball for whatever reason use him in a capacity where he could have an impact. If it doesn't work throw Brunell in the next drive. Seriously, what could it hurt at this point? I mean we''re 6 for 27 on 3rd down conversions. We need something, anything.
SKINS73 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2006, 10:03 AM   #15
vaoutlaws2006
Impact Rookie
 
vaoutlaws2006's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Fayettenam, NC
Age: 52
Posts: 806
Re: Antwaan Randle El

Quote:
Originally Posted by SKINS73 View Post
Don't use him as a franchise or permanent solution. But how confused would Jacksonville or Houston be if we started the game, no huddle, shotgun with Randle El under center? If our quarterback can't get him the ball for whatever reason use him in a capacity where he could have an impact. If it doesn't work throw Brunell in the next drive. Seriously, what could it hurt at this point? I mean we''re 6 for 27 on 3rd down conversions. We need something, anything.

I agree. I watched a highlight of Mike Vick in atlanta, now randel el is no mick vick, but the shotgun option they use would work or at least confuse a opponent
__________________
The future is obviously right now!
vaoutlaws2006 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:44 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 3.18767 seconds with 10 queries