Warrick Holdman Haters

tika49 · 09-12-2006, 12:20 AM

Hey for all you Warrick Holdman hater, and Lavar lovers, I think the Kid held his own and did a good job alongside Lemar and Marcus

MTK · 09-12-2006, 12:20 AM

He played well.

TAYLOR21 · 09-12-2006, 12:22 AM

man who gives a fu** about lavar hes in ny now!!

Big C · 09-12-2006, 12:28 AM

warrick did look good, props to him. linebackers were the only decent unit of the defense tonight

Gmanc711 · 09-12-2006, 01:02 AM

Honestly....I saw the game live so I cant be sure, but he looked like he played maybe better than anyone on the team.

Beemnseven · 09-12-2006, 01:06 AM

This has nothing to do with Holdman, because I thought he was decent tonight, but...

Would it kill the defense to force a turnover? For as quick as they are to get to the ball carrier, you'd think there'd be some sort of emphasis on ripping the ball away.

That's another knock on this D. Turnovers don't come easy for them.

#56fanatic · 09-12-2006, 09:59 AM

I am just not impressed with Holdman. they still ran the ball quite well to that side of the field. He looked like he took a couple of wrong angles going for tackles. I think he looks a lot better physically this year than he did last year. Maybe a little quicker. I did see him running around more, compared to last year. I wouldn't mind seeing Rocky play a little more. He is a beast, we just need him to learn the D a little faster.

Sheriff Gonna Getcha · 09-12-2006, 01:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Beemnseven

This has nothing to do with Holdman, because I thought he was decent tonight, but...

Would it kill the defense to force a turnover? For as quick as they are to get to the ball carrier, you'd think there'd be some sort of emphasis on ripping the ball away.

That's another knock on this D. Turnovers don't come easy for them.

They actually forced a fumble (that went out of bounds) and almost had two picks, they just couldn't seal the deal. That was the case early last year. I think they'll turn it around, like they did late last year.

ArtMonkDrillz · 09-12-2006, 01:59 PM

They also forced Johnson to fumble, but their o-lineman recovered it.

freddyg12 · 09-12-2006, 02:31 PM

Holdman played well, the run d was solid, we just couldn't stop them on 3rd down.
Anyone notice how the gmen hardly played lavar in passing situations?

That Guy · 09-12-2006, 11:19 PM

they had 2 FF, but neither one was recovered.

holdman looked okay, and i wasn't against keeping him (cheap depth), but he was definately terrible last year.

09-12-2006, 12:20 AM	#1
tika49 Camp Scrub Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Texas Age: 49 Posts: 13	Warrick Holdman Haters Hey for all you Warrick Holdman hater, and Lavar lovers, I think the Kid held his own and did a good job alongside Lemar and Marcus

09-12-2006, 12:20 AM	#2
MTK \m/ Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: NY Age: 52 Posts: 99,464	Re: Warrick Holdman Haters He played well. __________________ Support The Warpath! \| Warpath Shop

09-12-2006, 12:22 AM	#3
TAYLOR21 Camp Scrub Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: DALE CITY,VA Age: 34 Posts: 22	Re: Warrick Holdman Haters man who gives a fu** about lavar hes in ny now!!

09-12-2006, 12:28 AM	#4
Big C Mr. Brightside Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Leesburg, VA Age: 38 Posts: 4,453	Re: Warrick Holdman Haters warrick did look good, props to him. linebackers were the only decent unit of the defense tonight __________________ "I don't care what nobody say I'm a be me, stay hood stay real, cause I'm out here grindin'" -Joe Gibbs

09-12-2006, 01:06 AM	#6
Beemnseven Pro Bowl Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Virginia Beach Age: 50 Posts: 5,311	Re: Warrick Holdman Haters This has nothing to do with Holdman, because I thought he was decent tonight, but... Would it kill the defense to force a turnover? For as quick as they are to get to the ball carrier, you'd think there'd be some sort of emphasis on ripping the ball away. That's another knock on this D. Turnovers don't come easy for them.

09-12-2006, 01:02 AM	#5
Gmanc711 Thank You, Sean. Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Gaithersburg, MD Age: 39 Posts: 7,506	Re: Warrick Holdman Haters Honestly....I saw the game live so I cant be sure, but he looked like he played maybe better than anyone on the team. __________________ #21

09-12-2006, 09:59 AM	#7
#56fanatic The Starter Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Charlotte NC Age: 50 Posts: 1,801	Re: Warrick Holdman Haters I am just not impressed with Holdman. they still ran the ball quite well to that side of the field. He looked like he took a couple of wrong angles going for tackles. I think he looks a lot better physically this year than he did last year. Maybe a little quicker. I did see him running around more, compared to last year. I wouldn't mind seeing Rocky play a little more. He is a beast, we just need him to learn the D a little faster.

09-12-2006, 01:59 PM	#9
ArtMonkDrillz Franchise Player Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Ellicott City, MD Age: 42 Posts: 8,029	Re: Warrick Holdman Haters They also forced Johnson to fumble, but their o-lineman recovered it. __________________ "Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man." The Dude

09-12-2006, 02:31 PM	#10
freddyg12 Playmaker Join Date: Feb 2006 Posts: 4,540	Re: Warrick Holdman Haters Holdman played well, the run d was solid, we just couldn't stop them on 3rd down. Anyone notice how the gmen hardly played lavar in passing situations?

09-12-2006, 11:19 PM	#11
That Guy Living Legend Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: VA Age: 42 Posts: 17,553	Re: Warrick Holdman Haters they had 2 FF, but neither one was recovered. holdman looked okay, and i wasn't against keeping him (cheap depth), but he was definately terrible last year.

Warrick Holdman Haters

Locker Room Main Forum