Who is better

jasonskin · 05-15-2004, 01:31 PM

Who is better and works harder Renaldo Wynn or Phillip Daniels

SKINSnCANES · 05-15-2004, 06:04 PM

Daniels has put up better single season stats, but Wynn usually gets the job done without making or giving up the big play. Hopefully both will have great years.

Daseal · 05-15-2004, 11:30 PM

Wynn is very solid. He's not spectacular, but he's solid. He won't be giving up a huge play to his side, but he won't be stopping one dead.

Bergman14 · 05-16-2004, 12:39 AM

See thread on Portis' production this season

Drift Reality · 05-17-2004, 09:36 AM

This is a very vague question. It is hard to characterize who is better because these two players are so similar in their mediocrity.

From looking at past statistics, it seems that Daniels has had more success in getting to the Quarterback, but I think in general, both of these DE's are more of the run-stopping type, who are good at keeping containment and preventing the runningback or quarterback from getting outside, but aren't as effective in penetrating and disrupting the play in the backfield.

Hopefully, with our defensive scheme, it won't matter.

OaklandSkinz · 05-17-2004, 12:36 PM

I'd say Wynn...Very consistent, but then again hard to really compare the two, but as far as effectiveness Wynn would be the guy.

Riggo44 · 05-17-2004, 04:13 PM

I would have to give it to Wynn..

SmootSmack · 05-17-2004, 05:04 PM

Tough to say. Although apparently Daniels is more versatile because he can play some DT as well. Don't know if Wynn can do that

JoeRedskin · 05-17-2004, 05:05 PM

I pick Charles Mann.

OaklandSkinz · 05-17-2004, 05:33 PM

Wynn also can play DT or DE....he's 6'3" 292... he's always been versitile enough to play both positions..since college where he was first a DT before DE.

05-15-2004, 01:31 PM	#1
jasonskin Special Teams Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: washington dc Age: 42 Posts: 148	Who is better Who is better and works harder Renaldo Wynn or Phillip Daniels

05-15-2004, 06:04 PM	#2
SKINSnCANES Pro Bowl Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: New Jersey Age: 42 Posts: 5,454	Daniels has put up better single season stats, but Wynn usually gets the job done without making or giving up the big play. Hopefully both will have great years. __________________ "I'm used to winning, coming from the University of Miami. " Clinton Portis

05-17-2004, 04:13 PM	#7
Riggo44 The Starter Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: San Clemente CA Age: 51 Posts: 2,390	I would have to give it to Wynn.. __________________ Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy. Benjamin Franklin

05-17-2004, 05:04 PM	#8
SmootSmack Uncle Phil Join Date: Feb 2004 Posts: 45,256	Tough to say. Although apparently Daniels is more versatile because he can play some DT as well. Don't know if Wynn can do that __________________ You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You

05-15-2004, 11:30 PM	#3
Daseal Puppy Kicker Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Arlington, Virginia Age: 41 Posts: 8,341	Wynn is very solid. He's not spectacular, but he's solid. He won't be giving up a huge play to his side, but he won't be stopping one dead.

05-16-2004, 12:39 AM	#4
Bergman14 Special Teams Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Winston-Salem Age: 41 Posts: 138	See thread on Portis' production this season

05-17-2004, 09:36 AM	#5
Drift Reality Impact Rookie Join Date: May 2004 Posts: 506	This is a very vague question. It is hard to characterize who is better because these two players are so similar in their mediocrity. From looking at past statistics, it seems that Daniels has had more success in getting to the Quarterback, but I think in general, both of these DE's are more of the run-stopping type, who are good at keeping containment and preventing the runningback or quarterback from getting outside, but aren't as effective in penetrating and disrupting the play in the backfield. Hopefully, with our defensive scheme, it won't matter.

05-17-2004, 12:36 PM	#6
OaklandSkinz Camp Scrub Join Date: Mar 2004 Posts: 19	I'd say Wynn...Very consistent, but then again hard to really compare the two, but as far as effectiveness Wynn would be the guy.

05-17-2004, 05:05 PM	#9
JoeRedskin Contains football related knowledge Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Second Star On The Right Age: 61 Posts: 10,401	I pick Charles Mann.

05-17-2004, 05:33 PM	#10
OaklandSkinz Camp Scrub Join Date: Mar 2004 Posts: 19	Wynn also can play DT or DE....he's 6'3" 292... he's always been versitile enough to play both positions..since college where he was first a DT before DE.

Who is better

Locker Room Main Forum