Redskins | K. Adams visited team

[That Guy]

Redskins | K. Adams visited team
Fri, 7 Apr 2006 21:20:58 -0700

Jason La Canfora, of the Washington Post, reports free agent LB Keith Adams (Eagles) visited the Washington Redskins Friday, April 7, according to his agent. He is expected to decide between the Redskins and four other teams by next week.


apparently we're still in the running... two of the other teams are the cards and the raiders.

[dmek25]

i think adams is a waste and if thats the only option,lets draft someone with alittle upside

[Big C]

Originally Posted by dmek25

i think adams is a waste and if thats the only option,lets draft someone with alittle upside

agreed. i think we would do better either using someone already on the team or getting someone through the draft

[KLHJ2]

D'Quell Jackson?

[Big C]

i doubt he will be there, but that would be awesome to get him

[Pocket$ $traight]

What if they get Adams, sign Holdman and draft an LB in the second. Then they have turned another area of "weakness" into a strength.

I cannot emphasize enough how impressed I am with the offseason. The only true weakness that I see is at QB and as long as Brunell is healthy, they will be fine. All I keep hearing is how old he is. Well guess what. He is younger than Rich Gannon was when he had his best years and the talent on that Raiders team wasn't on the same map as this team.

I really think that they are ready for a special year.

[That Guy]

if its a cheap deal i wouldn't have a problem with it. too much depth issn't a bad thing.

[dmek25]

actually as much as i was down on holdman last season,for the right money i would be willing to bring him back.cant be as bad as he was last year(im starting to think i should start every post with,for the right money)

[GTripp0012]

Originally Posted by Big C

agreed. i think we would do better either using someone already on the team or getting someone through the draft

Sign Adams, and draft a MLB. That would be the idea situation.

[EXoffender]

Originally Posted by That Guy

if its a cheap deal i wouldn't have a problem with it. too much depth issn't a bad thing.

Agreed.

[jdlea]

Originally Posted by angryssg

D'Quell Jackson?

If they go that route, they need to move Marshall back outside because Jackson is an ILB and having 2 guys playing out of position is just not a good idea, IMO.

[Big C]

Originally Posted by jdlea

If they go that route, they need to move Marshall back outside because Jackson is an ILB and having 2 guys playing out of position is just not a good idea, IMO.

i wouldnt call marshall at MLB playing out of position anymore. he was great last year so he is now a true MLB id say.

[jdlea]

Originally Posted by Big C

i wouldnt call marshall at MLB playing out of position anymore. he was great last year so he is now a true MLB id say.

That's a good point, but I unless we move him outside, I don't want Jackson playing out of position. That's more why I don't know that Jackson fits here

[Big C]

http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/player...e?statsId=5680

not too impressive if you ask me. 1 FF in his career, 0 ints, career high 59 tackles last year, zero sacks in his career. he was crap in an eagles crappy linebacking corps, why take their trash?

[That Guy]

Originally Posted by Big C

http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/player...e?statsId=5680

not too impressive if you ask me. 1 FF in his career, 0 ints, career high 59 tackles last year, zero sacks in his career. he was crap in an eagles crappy linebacking corps, why take their trash?

because he's still better than holdman... he had 34 more solo tackles... over 3 times as many solo takedowns.