|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
02-05-2006, 08:04 AM | #1 |
^21^
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Richmond, Virginia
Age: 52
Posts: 1,630
|
Snub.
I blame Peter King. My guess is Peter King won't be on the committee next year and Art Monk will get in the HOF. No other reason he's not in yet!
__________________
^21^ |
Advertisements |
02-05-2006, 09:07 AM | #2 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Rehoboth Beach, DE
Posts: 3,494
|
Re: Snub.
I don't think there's a lot of movement on the HOF committee. From what I understand, if he wants to continue, he likely will.
My strident concern regarding Peter King, who does know more than a little about the NFL, is that he doesn't even see how much of an obstructionist he is in this matter. To quote Beemnseven's post in another topic regarding Theismann's assertion that King has stood in the way of Monk, 1. He doesn't have the influence Theismann thinks he does.I can't think of a single athlete, in any sport (with the possible exception of noted and admitted cheat Pete Rose) who inspires annual column space about why he does not deserve enshrinement. Every year though, I remember to buy my wife a Valentine's Day gift when I read Peter King tell his readership why Art Monk belongs in his mythical "Hall of the Very Good". Since it would appear that he's made some sort of stand before entering the room to vote, I submit that issue #2 is a raft of crap. As for influence among the voters - his bio tells a different tale. One of the most respected football journalists, Sports Illustrated's Peter King joined HBO's INSIDE THE NFL as managing editor and reporter for the 2002 season. King came to SPORTS ILLUSTRATED as a staff writer in 1989 after spending nearly a decade as an award-winning newspaper journalist. Now a senior writer at the magazine, he is SI's primary NFL expert and is one of the country's premier pro football writers. The author of the magazine's weekly "Inside the NFL" column, King is also a key contributor to SI.com, including his popular "Monday Morning Quarterback" column.Note that the above bio (from HBO.com) doesn't include the many radio interviews he gives, where he is often described as the preeminent expert on the league. One could easily argue he has a larger profile (no pun intended) than any voter on the list with the exception of Mike Wilbon - who is not specifically an NFL expert like King. I understand the argument that Monk was the most feared receiver on his team at times (though, considering the number of catches he made in his career, one is left to wonder whether that reflects on Monk or the stupidity of defensive cooredinators of the day). Couldn't the same argument be made for Harry Carson, the 2006 inductee very good linebacker whose water King has carried these many years? Surely Lawrence Taylor was the player teams feared, and not Carson - who maybe stuck around a few too many seasons (like a certain #81) and didn't have the stats late in his career that he did as a younger man.
__________________
There's nowhere to go but up. Or down. I guess we could stay where we are, too. |
02-05-2006, 09:15 AM | #3 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Northern Virginia, Woodbridge
Age: 62
Posts: 2,507
|
Re: Snub.
Monk IS a HOF'er whether they acknowlege it or not.
81 is #1
__________________
Check out Mike Hedrick - The Next Food Network Star. Please Click and give me a Thumbs Up and Positive Comment. Thanks |
02-05-2006, 11:05 AM | #4 |
MVP
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: lancaster,pa
Age: 63
Posts: 10,672
|
Re: Snub.
why would harry carson be considered more of a hall of famer than mr monk?
|
02-05-2006, 11:49 AM | #5 | |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: May 2004
Location: England
Posts: 935
|
Re: Snub.
Quote:
|
|
02-05-2006, 12:31 PM | #6 | ||
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Rehoboth Beach, DE
Posts: 3,494
|
Re: Snub.
Quote:
Monk, who played in run-first offenses, still put up (at the time) unparalleled stats, and blocked in the running game as well as any receiver of the time.
__________________
There's nowhere to go but up. Or down. I guess we could stay where we are, too. |
||
02-05-2006, 02:30 PM | #7 |
\m/
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,464
|
Re: Snub.
It took Carson forever to get in, I'm thinking Monk could face a similar uphill climb.
|
02-05-2006, 02:49 PM | #8 |
MVP
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Seattle
Age: 45
Posts: 10,069
|
Re: Snub.
Well, it took Swann 14 tries...Monk will get in but not soon.
__________________
"The Redskins have always suffered from chronic organizational deformities under Snyder." -Jenkins |
02-05-2006, 03:31 PM | #9 |
Closet Redskins Fan
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 495
|
Re: Snub.
I think that next year will be a 'Catch Up' year where the HoF doesn't have a ton of Former Superstars they have to put in as 'First Timers'.
I think Monk gettting in next year is a done deal. Long Overdue, but mark it down, he is in next year. Along with Gary Zimmerman and Maybe Grimm. I think that There should be a Redskins Hall of Fame inside FedEx as there should be a Cowboys Hall of Fame inside the New Stadium that JJ is building. Tha fact that there are more Cards in the Hof than Cowboys is ridiculous.
__________________
I am a complete and unabashed Romosexual. |
|
|