WR screen(fake)

Hail2em · 01-08-2006, 02:38 PM

the fake wr screen to moss would have scored if brunell would have been more accurate and i think we need to try that again this week in seattle.

steveo395 · 01-08-2006, 03:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hail2em

the fake wr screen to moss would have scored if brunell would have been more accurate and i think we need to try that again this week in seattle.

i just wish brunell didnt have to suck

JWsleep · 01-08-2006, 03:56 PM

THat was a beautifully designed play--Gibbs had it set up perfectly. You only get a few shots a game against a D like that. Sucks we didn't execute. Thank god for our D!!!

skinsguy · 01-08-2006, 05:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by steveo395

i just wish brunell didnt have to suck

Don't be ignorant. Brunell had a tough game...the entire offense had a tough game. Brunell doesn't suck.

saskin · 01-08-2006, 06:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by skinsguy

Don't be ignorant. Brunell had a tough game...the entire offense had a tough game. Brunell doesn't suck.

Yes he does! He only has 23 touchdowns and 11 interceptions!

So you see, he sucks!:yeahright

skinsguy · 01-08-2006, 08:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Redskins88

Yes he does! He only has 23 touchdowns and 11 interceptions!

So you see, he sucks!:yeahright

LOL....yeah what was I thinking! :smashfrea

cpayne5 · 01-08-2006, 08:40 PM

If I remember correctly, Brunell was about to get creamed and had to throw off his back foot quickly.

saden1 · 01-08-2006, 08:44 PM

Was that was a sick move,, just sick, Moss put on the CB or what? He so had him.

Beemnseven · 01-08-2006, 09:39 PM

If Chris Samuels doesn't forget how to play left tackle for a night, Brunell's production improves significantly.

They were in Brunell's face all night. What I would have liked to see was a quick little shovel pass to Betts or Portis with both defensive ends on a hard rush to the QB. That's two defensive players completely out of the play.

But with the way Tampa Bay was playing, it wouldn't have mattered what you threw at them, they ate it up. That defense was amazing.

Daseal · 01-08-2006, 10:02 PM

Brunell got pretty good protection in philly and what'd he do there....

I think Brunell can't play injured and he's too worried about losing his job to sit out. I simply can't fathom people defending that game he had. While there were protection issues he also missed wide open receivers when he had time.

FirstandTen · 01-08-2006, 10:25 PM

That was a Great play... I hope we see it this week after we run the REAL WR Screen a few times.

Warpath · 01-08-2006, 10:25 PM

Just don't forget that the Bucs had the #1 ranked Defense. From http://www.nfl.com/stats/teamsort/NF...r?sort_col_1=4
which lists the leagues top 5 defenses: (for the 2005 season)
1. Tampa Bay
2. Chicago
3. Carolina
4. Pittsburgh
5. Baltimore
9. Washington
17. Seattle
The top 5 Offenses are:
1. Kansas City
2. Seattle
3. Indy
4. New York Giants
5. Denver
11. Washington
Just to add to the actual posting, Moss did make a great juke. This play works so well sometimes, and then can work so horribly as well.

hooskins · 01-08-2006, 10:36 PM

This is a silly argument, we all know Brunell does not suck, he brought us this far. But it can be agreed upon that he suckED last game, regardless if it was his fault or not.

SUNRA · 01-08-2006, 11:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Daseal

Brunell got pretty good protection in philly and what'd he do there....

I think Brunell can't play injured and he's too worried about losing his job to sit out. I simply can't fathom people defending that game he had. While there were protection issues he also missed wide open receivers when he had time.

Lose his job to who? Jason Campbell? That's a given next year, but as of now, he is the captain of this ship and just remember who got us to this point with 23 TD's .

regulus · 01-09-2006, 02:38 AM

As always I completely disagree with Daseal on QBs. Randall Cunningham still a Hall of Famer, Pele?

1-0 in the Playoffs and if he has a good game in Seattle...you may be on his jock.

01-08-2006, 03:56 PM	#3
JWsleep Propane and propane accessories Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Houston, TX Age: 55 Posts: 4,714	Re: WR screen(fake) THat was a beautifully designed play--Gibbs had it set up perfectly. You only get a few shots a game against a D like that. Sucks we didn't execute. Thank god for our D!!! __________________ Hail from Houston!

01-08-2006, 08:40 PM	#7
cpayne5 Playmaker Join Date: Feb 2004 Posts: 3,807	Re: WR screen(fake) If I remember correctly, Brunell was about to get creamed and had to throw off his back foot quickly. __________________ "It's not about what you've done, but what's been done for you."

01-08-2006, 08:44 PM	#8
saden1 MVP Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Seattle Age: 45 Posts: 10,069	Re: WR screen(fake) Was that was a sick move,, just sick, Moss put on the CB or what? He so had him. __________________ "The Redskins have always suffered from chronic organizational deformities under Snyder." -Jenkins

01-08-2006, 09:39 PM	#9
Beemnseven Pro Bowl Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Virginia Beach Age: 50 Posts: 5,311	Re: WR screen(fake) If Chris Samuels doesn't forget how to play left tackle for a night, Brunell's production improves significantly. They were in Brunell's face all night. What I would have liked to see was a quick little shovel pass to Betts or Portis with both defensive ends on a hard rush to the QB. That's two defensive players completely out of the play. But with the way Tampa Bay was playing, it wouldn't have mattered what you threw at them, they ate it up. That defense was amazing.

01-08-2006, 10:02 PM	#10
Daseal Puppy Kicker Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Arlington, Virginia Age: 41 Posts: 8,341	Re: WR screen(fake) Brunell got pretty good protection in philly and what'd he do there.... I think Brunell can't play injured and he's too worried about losing his job to sit out. I simply can't fathom people defending that game he had. While there were protection issues he also missed wide open receivers when he had time. __________________ Best. Player. Available.

01-08-2006, 02:38 PM	#1
Hail2em Registered User Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Va. Beach, Virginia Posts: 229	WR screen(fake) the fake wr screen to moss would have scored if brunell would have been more accurate and i think we need to try that again this week in seattle.

01-08-2006, 10:25 PM	#11
FirstandTen Special Teams Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Bristow VA Age: 48 Posts: 254	Re: WR screen(fake) That was a Great play... I hope we see it this week after we run the REAL WR Screen a few times.

01-08-2006, 10:25 PM	#12
Warpath The Starter Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Potomac Falls, VA Age: 48 Posts: 1,762	Re: WR screen(fake) Just don't forget that the Bucs had the #1 ranked Defense. From http://www.nfl.com/stats/teamsort/NF...r?sort_col_1=4 which lists the leagues top 5 defenses: (for the 2005 season) 1. Tampa Bay 2. Chicago 3. Carolina 4. Pittsburgh 5. Baltimore 9. Washington 17. Seattle The top 5 Offenses are: 1. Kansas City 2. Seattle 3. Indy 4. New York Giants 5. Denver 11. Washington Just to add to the actual posting, Moss did make a great juke. This play works so well sometimes, and then can work so horribly as well.

01-08-2006, 10:36 PM	#13
hooskins Most Interesting Man in the World Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Chantilly, VA Age: 37 Posts: 8,606	Re: WR screen(fake) This is a silly argument, we all know Brunell does not suck, he brought us this far. But it can be agreed upon that he suckED last game, regardless if it was his fault or not. __________________ Vacancy

01-09-2006, 02:38 AM	#15
regulus Camp Scrub Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: Phoenix, AZ Age: 43 Posts: 14	Re: WR screen(fake) As always I completely disagree with Daseal on QBs. Randall Cunningham still a Hall of Famer, Pele? 1-0 in the Playoffs and if he has a good game in Seattle...you may be on his jock.

WR screen(fake)

Locker Room Main Forum