|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
View Poll Results: Do you approve of the trade for Alex Smith? | |||
Yes | 50 | 58.14% | |
No | 36 | 41.86% | |
Voters: 86. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
01-31-2018, 05:53 PM | #346 |
Warpath Hall of Fame
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 34,420
|
Re: Redskins trade for Alex Smith
I’m over it...welcome Alex smith. Now Bruce work your magic and trade Cousins
__________________
My pronouns: King/Your ruler He Gets Us |
Advertisements |
01-31-2018, 05:53 PM | #347 |
\m/
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,464
|
Redskins trade for Alex Smith
Nobody cares about winning trades. It’s always about wins on the field. It’s a move that could work out well for both sides.
|
01-31-2018, 05:54 PM | #348 |
A Dude
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Newtown Square, PA
Age: 45
Posts: 12,421
|
Re: Redskins trade for Alex Smith
Thank God. Your incessant whining was getting old.
__________________
God made certain people to play football. He was one of them. |
01-31-2018, 05:55 PM | #349 |
A Dude
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Newtown Square, PA
Age: 45
Posts: 12,421
|
Re: Redskins trade for Alex Smith
Bottom line: we had a QB we could win with, not because of. He wasn't going to stay for the long haul. And now we have a QB we can win with, not because of, and he's here for the long haul and we've got some cap space to continue building up the defense.
We're not worse than we were, and we've got the resources to get better.
__________________
God made certain people to play football. He was one of them. |
01-31-2018, 05:59 PM | #350 |
Another Year, another mess.
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,581
|
Re: Redskins trade for Alex Smith
Both teams won the trade. KC saves 17mm and the Redskins save 11+ mm on what it would have taken to tag or keep Cousins. Fuller is the cost of doing business to get a starting QB. We get a compensatory pick in the third round for Cousins next year. All other vet QB's on the market aren't as good as these two players.
Anyone who is mad is not realistic about the situation. Kirk did not want to stay here. He had them by the balls and this was their way out.
__________________
That got ugly fast |
01-31-2018, 06:11 PM | #351 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Yokohama, Japan
Posts: 4,525
|
Re: Redskins trade for Alex Smith
Quote:
I was trying to say, as a Redskins fan, I don't feel like saying that I "LOVE" the trade itself. But I can say I'm happy about it, and feeling good about what it means for the future of this team!
__________________
Derz Ambassaderz in the Land of the Rising Sun. Oui Monsieur. |
|
01-31-2018, 06:21 PM | #352 | |
Hug Anne Spyder
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 20,446
|
Re: Redskins trade for Alex Smith
Quote:
Aka "man, they sure did a great job digging us out of this totally self-inflicted hole they put us in." We already have enough problems without our FO creating more to be solved. BTW there's no way with this new contract we are saving 11 mil a year over Cousins. The difference is there, definitely not that big though. Can't wait until Smith is dinking and dunking us down the field and we're all complaining about how he isn't as aggressive as Cousins.
__________________
Hail to the Football Team |
|
01-31-2018, 06:29 PM | #353 | |
\m/
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,464
|
Re: Redskins trade for Alex Smith
Quote:
Given the fact we can’t go back in time and sign Cousins to a LTD before the back to back tag nonsense, what solution would you be ok with right now? |
|
01-31-2018, 06:31 PM | #354 |
The Starter
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,590
|
Re: Redskins Trade for Alex Smith
Here's a question, if you have somebody on a transition tag, Can you trade them to another team? And If so, does that team then inherit rights of 1st refusal while the Player seeks offers from other teams?
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
__________________
You like that! You like that! |
01-31-2018, 06:33 PM | #355 |
Playmaker
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 3,754
|
Re: Redskins trade for Alex Smith
|
01-31-2018, 06:40 PM | #356 | |
\m/
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,464
|
Re: Redskins Trade for Alex Smith
Quote:
Quite simply, no |
|
01-31-2018, 06:40 PM | #357 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 2,684
|
Re: Redskins trade for Alex Smith
Smith throws long ball better than Cousins! He has way more postseason games than Cousins..he comes in a lot cheaper than Cousins. Maybe Doctson will have a new breath of life with Smith! looking for positives about this deal!!
|
01-31-2018, 06:41 PM | #358 | |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Pawleys Island SC
Posts: 680
|
Re: Redskins trade for Alex Smith
Quote:
Had we offered KC this contract 2 years most of us would have gone ballistic. And we should have, KC was nowhere near earning this kind of contract 2 years ago. |
|
01-31-2018, 06:44 PM | #359 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 3,754
|
Re: Redskins trade for Alex Smith
Quote:
KC got a decent CB with potential, a 3rd round pick, and saved $. All they had to give up was a 33 yo QB (will be 34 next season) they were ready to let go anyways. WASH gave up the aforementioned player and pick, saved $. And will either let a 30 yo QB they know works well in their system go for nothing (maybe a 3rd rd don't count on it) or trans tag him for a trade. Nothing would surprise me at this point. KC did well this deal. WASH actually didn't do bad getting Alex Smith but it doesn't cover up their failure signing Cousins. We basically gave a pick and player for the privilege of getting a 3-4 year older QB. |
|
01-31-2018, 06:47 PM | #360 | |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Pawleys Island SC
Posts: 680
|
Re: Redskins trade for Alex Smith
Quote:
So Mooby, tell us what the front office should have done 2 years ago. Offer him a long term deal? Did you object to the “prove it” tag? Let’s just say that Kirk rolled the dice and won. And got lucky that he didn’t get injured, at least in part because the team invested in a decent O-line. Game was over for the FO once he made it through the season before last. |
|
|
|