Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


What's your take on our coaching?

Locker Room Main Forum


View Poll Results: Should Mike Shanahan be on the "hot seat"?
Yes 39 27.46%
No 103 72.54%
Voters: 142. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-31-2011, 12:38 PM   #166
mooby
Hug Anne Spyder
 
mooby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 20,468
Re: What's your take on our coaching?

Sorry, but if we let Mike Shanahan go we're just setting ourselves up for more years of mediocrity. Kyle Shanahan on the other hand...

I don't think we have to get rid of Kyle S., but he does need to diversify up his offense and learn to attack opponents' weaknesses better. He just wants to pass all day, and even the best passing offenses know how valuable running the ball is. I hope we have the players next year that fit what Kyle S. wants to do, because right now it looks like injuries are really going to limit our effectiveness on offense for the rest of the year.
__________________
Hail to the Football Team
mooby is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 10-31-2011, 12:44 PM   #167
firstdown
Living Legend
 
firstdown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: chesapeake, va
Age: 60
Posts: 15,817
Re: What's your take on our coaching?

We are getting better. Last yr the Eagles scored 28 points in the first qtr and this year only 20 points the entire game.
firstdown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2011, 12:45 PM   #168
Lotus
Fire Bruce NOW
 
Lotus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Hattiesburg, MS
Posts: 11,434
Re: What's your take on our coaching?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk View Post
Problem is we can't run the ball effectively right now either. The injuries on the OL have really hurt.
We don't even try. Good ground attacks keep going back to the well. What doesn't work in the first quarter may produce a long touchdown in the 4th quarter when the defense is winded.

And it is not just the number of runs which lead me to say that we don't try. It is also the variety of plays. We have stretch left and stretch right. That seems to be about it, excluding a brilliant reverse on the second play of the game.

Kyle didn't have a real ground game in Houston, either, but they developed one after he left with much of the same personnel.

In the end, the run may or may not work. But trying to milk a passing game out of Wrecks and Beck has no chance.
__________________
Bruce Allen when in charge alone: 4-12 (.250)
Bruce Allen's overall Redskins record : 28-52 (.350)
Vinny Cerrato's record when in charge alone: 52-65 (.444)
Vinny's overall Redskins record: 62-82 (.430)
We won more with Vinny
Lotus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2011, 01:00 PM   #169
SmootSmack
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
Re: What's your take on our coaching?

Well the Texans added Arian Foster, that was the major change. Otherwise, I'm pretty sure the Texans didn't attempt to run the ball last year any more than when KS was the OC in 2009
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2011, 01:04 PM   #170
Alvin Walton
Pro Bowl
 
Alvin Walton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Holland, Michigan
Posts: 5,741
Re: What's your take on our coaching?

Playing Cooley at FB twice in the same set of downs tells me Kyle is innovative and a risk taker.
However sometimes its a fine line between being innovative and being an idiot.
__________________
REDSKINS FAN SINCE 1968
Alvin Walton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2011, 01:06 PM   #171
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,513
Re: What's your take on our coaching?

Not sure why playing Cooley at FB was such a big deal. He played H-back under Gibbs and had similar responsibilities.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2011, 01:11 PM   #172
mlmpetert
Playmaker
 
mlmpetert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Richmond
Posts: 3,261
Re: What's your take on our coaching?

Quote:
Originally Posted by GTripp0012 View Post
But can you turn it into a .500 team with some promise in two offseasons?

Not if you make a dramatic change to the defense. While our D is now decent (maybe even good) after a horrible year last season, we still spent money and draft picks to fix something that wasnt broken. The opportunity cost of doing that is in my opinion reflected on our offense.

I dont think Mike should be on the hot seat by any means but i think Kyle should be. But thats the problem with hiring your friend or family (regardless of merit), the situation is much more dynamic that just business.
__________________
mlmpetert is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2011, 01:13 PM   #173
skinsfan69
Living Legend
 
skinsfan69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,280
Re: What's your take on our coaching?

Bottom line Kyle was totally outcoached by George Edwards yesterday. People can talk about Kyle's days in Houston all they want. I really don't care what he did in Houston. He's here now and his offense has been awful and it was down right atrocious yesterday.
skinsfan69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2011, 01:13 PM   #174
The Goat
Pro Bowl
 
The Goat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 5,662
Re: What's your take on our coaching?

Quote:
Originally Posted by SmootSmack View Post
I still maintain that people are unfairly harsh on Kyle becaue of his last name. He hasn't been riding his father's coattails. He'll prove a lot of people here wrong before you know it
I sincerely, genuinely and enthusiastically hope you're right duder.
__________________
24-34
The Goat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2011, 01:16 PM   #175
mlmpetert
Playmaker
 
mlmpetert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Richmond
Posts: 3,261
Re: What's your take on our coaching?

My biggest beef with Mike Shanahan is that I don’t know where he adds value. He doesn’t call offensive or defensive plays and he doesn’t seem to have the team prepared to play consistently. If hes leaving everything up the assistant coaches that’s fine, but at what point does he step in?
__________________
mlmpetert is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2011, 01:21 PM   #176
REDSKINS4ever
Playmaker
 
REDSKINS4ever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Washington, D.C.
Posts: 4,101
Re: What's your take on our coaching?

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Goat View Post
Starting with the top down...

My frustration with Mike is building. I think as the "big picture" goes he's wasted two years with the QB situation and (therefor) to a large extent the offense. To be sure Kyle has much to do with the QB mess, assuming he's the primary reason we have Rex on the roster at all. But at the end of the day Mike is still the HC. The other frustration with Mike is our lack of preparedness, especially on offense and teams. The delay of game today on the field goal turned punt is a prime example.

In general I don't feel like the offense consistently works together and fights to win. When Helu took a big shot today on that short pass (he couldn't make the catch and got the wind knocked out of him) just one player, a lineman I think, came over to check on him, and that guy didn't even help Helu up. WTF?! This kid is a promising rookie and just got plastered. I think the lack of camaraderie on offense is a symptom of Mike's failure in leadership.

On the defense there's plenty of camaraderie and these guys are definitely fighting to win. Haslett is a great motivator IMHO. His scheme is suspect part of the time, but I will go on record Haslett has exceeded my expectations.

So, I'm disappointed in the Shanahans and pretty damn impressed with Haslett. Very curious to know what ya'll are thinking...so discuss!

PS I think Mike's history as a returning 2X championship HC has to be taken into account when assessing his performance here. I definitely expected him to come in with a solid plan of action and have the offense, especially the QB situation, moving in a better direction by now.

I agree. Mike Shanahan supposedly knows quarterbacks. He's coached the best. Steve Young, John Elway, Jake Plummer, and Jay Cutler. Grossman is only in Washington because he played for Kyle in Houston. Beck is here because Mike Shanahan liked him since his days at BYU. But it's clear as crystal that Bruce Allen and Mike Shanahan are going to have to draft a quarterback in April. I would like to see them select Landry Jones. If they can somehow get Andrew Luck, which I doubt they will, then Landry Jones is the next best thing. Jones is certainly more capable than either Grossman or Beck.
REDSKINS4ever is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2011, 01:24 PM   #177
Meks
Pro Bowl
 
Meks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: South Jersey
Age: 39
Posts: 5,648
Re: What's your take on our coaching?

if I hafta see another game filled with 10 yd cushions. smh I might drive off a cliff
__________________
R.I.P #21SEAN TAYLOR
Meks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2011, 01:25 PM   #178
Meks
Pro Bowl
 
Meks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: South Jersey
Age: 39
Posts: 5,648
Re: What's your take on our coaching?

oh and I'm sick of our high-school offense. plz fire kyle
__________________
R.I.P #21SEAN TAYLOR
Meks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2011, 01:30 PM   #179
IrMitchell
Impact Rookie
 
IrMitchell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 657
Re: What's your take on our coaching?

The problem is Kyle isn't going to leave. We're stuck with him..

I just hope at some point Mike says, back off let me save our name.
__________________
One of Canada's two Redskins fans.
IrMitchell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2011, 01:46 PM   #180
Beemnseven
Pro Bowl
 
Beemnseven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Virginia Beach
Age: 50
Posts: 5,311
Re: What's your take on our coaching?

Quote:
Originally Posted by mooby
"... [Kyle] just wants to pass all day, and even the best passing offenses know how valuable running the ball is."
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lotus View Post
"We don't even try. Good ground attacks keep going back to the well. What doesn't work in the first quarter may produce a long touchdown in the 4th quarter when the defense is winded."
Ugh, again with running the ball...

What is it that convinces people that 'pounding the rock' is the solution to all our offensive problems? Do people still seriously believe that these are the Hogs of 1982? That all they have to do is run the ball 55 times a game regardless of the in-game circumstances? They can't pass block and they can't run block.

Keep this in mind: Before taking Trent Williams, this team hadn't selected an offensive lineman in the first two rounds of the draft since Chris Samuels 12 years ago. Kyle wasn't the one who neglected the line for a dozen seasons. And Shanahan and Allen haven't had enough drafts or draft picks to rectify it.

I'll never understand why the coaches are the ultimate demons in this nightmare.

Last edited by Beemnseven; 10-31-2011 at 01:47 PM.
Beemnseven is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:59 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.25015 seconds with 11 queries