Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


The Vick Factor

Locker Room Main Forum


View Poll Results: Should the Skins try to acquire Michael Vick?
Yes 71 32.42%
No 148 67.58%
Voters: 219. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-26-2009, 06:40 PM   #151
Smooter
Impact Rookie
 
Smooter's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Age: 41
Posts: 965
Re: The Vick Factor

Hopefully our offensive line will be improved this year or we'll need someone like Vick just to be able to run from pass rushers.
__________________
Same freakout different year.
Smooter is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 05-26-2009, 07:04 PM   #152
Brian Orakpo
Guest
 
Brian Orakpo's Avatar
 
Posts: n/a
Re: The Vick Factor

Quote:
Originally Posted by GusFrerotte View Post
but the Falcons sucked with him at QB before his doggie trouble.
40-30-1 career record as QB of the Falcons. I dont want Vick either but the Falcons didnt suck with Vick as QB.
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2009, 07:12 PM   #153
Zerohero
Impact Rookie
 
Zerohero's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: phoenix, az
Age: 46
Posts: 901
Re: The Vick Factor

Quote:
Originally Posted by BleedBurgundy View Post
wow, didn't think I would see so many excuses for this clown. Why should anyone have to be accountable for their actions. And that whole "did the time" shit, seriously, let's be realistic. If you're a felon, you're pretty much a piece of shit in society's eyes. Hope that doesn't break any hearts.
Yall need to put down the hate goggles and chill out for a second. Guess what some people really liked Vick, so of course there's gonna be some support but even then check the poll. The great majority don't want him on the team.

It's funny how fishing was brought up in this thread, just think about it for a sec.
Zerohero is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2009, 07:16 PM   #154
dmek25
MVP
 
dmek25's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: lancaster,pa
Age: 63
Posts: 10,672
Re: The Vick Factor

the reasons i don't want him have absolutely nothing to do with his involvement in dog fighting
__________________
"It's better to be quiet and thought a fool than to open ones mouth and remove all doubt."
courtesy of 53fan
dmek25 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2009, 07:22 PM   #155
Ruhskins
Living Legend
 
Ruhskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,368
Re: The Vick Factor

Vick wasn't known to be a passing QB like Brees/Manning/Favre etc., etc., and he was never expected to put up tons of yards through the air, so why would Snyder want him? Snyder wanted Cutler b/c he thought he could put up a lot of yards through the air, the same with Sanchez.
__________________
R.I.P. #21
Ruhskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2009, 08:08 PM   #156
Missin21
Special Teams
 
Missin21's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Leesburg, Va
Posts: 173
Re: The Vick Factor

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian Orakpo View Post
I thought it was a serious question. If it is a joke though it makes sense. The post just read as something serious where he really thought it was a probation violation. If he was joking he got me on that one.
Agreed. I thought the same thing. Got me too.


Missin21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2009, 09:29 PM   #157
Slingin Sammy 33
Playmaker
 
Slingin Sammy 33's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Virginia Beach
Posts: 4,347
Re: The Vick Factor

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian Orakpo View Post
40-30-1 career record as QB of the Falcons. I dont want Vick either but the Falcons didnt suck with Vick as QB.
His last 2 years of playing he sucked, 15-16 record, QB rating under 76. Hasn't been in an NFL training program in over 2 years, let alone in a game.
__________________
"I would bet.....(if), an angel fairy came down and said, '[You can have anything] in the world you would like to own,' I wouldn't be surprised if you said a football club and particularly the Washington Redskins.'' — Jack Kent Cooke, 1996.
Slingin Sammy 33 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2009, 09:33 PM   #158
Dirtbag59
Naega jeil jal naga
 
Dirtbag59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, Georgia From: Silver Spring, Maryland
Age: 39
Posts: 14,750
Re: The Vick Factor

Quote:
Originally Posted by Slingin Sammy 33 View Post
His last 2 years of playing he sucked, 15-16 record, QB rating under 76. Hasn't been in an NFL training program in over 2 years, let alone in a game.
It's like I've been saying. Once teams figured out he couldn't pass he became a lot less effective.
__________________
"It's nice to be important, but its more important to be nice."
- Scooter

"I feel like Dirtbag has been slowly and methodically trolling the board for a month or so now."
- FRPLG
Dirtbag59 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2009, 09:48 PM   #159
Brian Orakpo
Guest
 
Brian Orakpo's Avatar
 
Posts: n/a
Re: The Vick Factor

Quote:
Originally Posted by Slingin Sammy 33 View Post
His last 2 years of playing he sucked, 15-16 record, QB rating under 76. Hasn't been in an NFL training program in over 2 years, let alone in a game.
His last season he was 204-388 for 2474 yds and a 20-13 TD-INT Ratio

He also rushed for 1039 yds and 2 TDs on only 123 carries.

He didnt suck. He was probably the main reason why they won 7 games with that half ass supporting cast around him.

Anyone who thinks Michael Vick sucked didnt watch him play. He wasnt a great passer but combined with his running ability he was a combo threat that won games.

Last edited by Brian Orakpo; 05-26-2009 at 09:53 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2009, 10:15 PM   #160
GusFrerotte
Registered User
 
GusFrerotte's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Detroit area
Posts: 4,153
Re: The Vick Factor

He sucked in that at times he barely could get 100 yards passing in some games. What did the rest of my original post state? Only pure passing QB's win the SB. That isn't BS, that is a fact. Look at McNabb. He had one SB appearance, and that was because as time went by he finally became a really strong passer. Vick is fun to watch, but he won't get to a SB anytime soon. My guess is the Vikings will pick him up to challenge for the starting position. Bottom line is that he is too one dimensional to be highly valued in the NFL.
GusFrerotte is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2009, 10:17 PM   #161
Slingin Sammy 33
Playmaker
 
Slingin Sammy 33's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Virginia Beach
Posts: 4,347
Re: The Vick Factor

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian Orakpo View Post
His last season he was 204-388 for 2474 yds and a 20-13 TD-INT Ratio
52.6 Comp % sucks, his TD-INT ratio is nothing to write home about.

Quote:
Anyone who thinks Michael Vick sucked didnt watch him play. He wasnt a great passer but combined with his running ability he was a combo threat that won games.
I guess that's why ATL finished the 2006 season 2-7.

2006 Ranks - Points - 25th, Sacks Allowed - 7th, Sack % - 2nd, Yds per Pass Attempt - 28th. ATL had 18 fumbles in 2006, 9 were by Vick.

Anyone who knows football and watched Vick, knows he struggled once DCs figured out he couldn't throw the ball into the ocean standing on the shore. The guy never learned to read a defense, his HS coach used under 10 plays, Stinespring at VT isn't the best OC in D-I, when Vick got to the NFL he never progressed. Once teams figured out to just keep him in the pocket, he was garbage. He's definitely nothing more than damaged goods now. Let the AFL or someone else deal with this idiot.
__________________
"I would bet.....(if), an angel fairy came down and said, '[You can have anything] in the world you would like to own,' I wouldn't be surprised if you said a football club and particularly the Washington Redskins.'' — Jack Kent Cooke, 1996.
Slingin Sammy 33 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2009, 10:22 PM   #162
DBUCHANON101
The Starter
 
DBUCHANON101's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 1,373
Re: The Vick Factor

^ Agreed
DBUCHANON101 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2009, 10:24 PM   #163
Brian Orakpo
Guest
 
Brian Orakpo's Avatar
 
Posts: n/a
Re: The Vick Factor

Quote:
Originally Posted by GusFrerotte View Post
He sucked in that at times he barely could get 100 yards passing in some games. What did the rest of my original post state? Only pure passing QB's win the SB. That isn't BS, that is a fact. Look at McNabb. He had one SB appearance, and that was because as time went by he finally became a really strong passer. Vick is fun to watch, but he won't get to a SB anytime soon. My guess is the Vikings will pick him up to challenge for the starting position. Bottom line is that he is too one dimensional to be highly valued in the NFL.
Im not saying hes a great or even good passer. All im saying is while in Atlanta he went 40-30-1. His last year in the league he threw for 20 TDs and also had 1000 yards rushing. If you say Vick sucks as a passer thats one thing and going by his career completion % id agree with you. When you factor in the complete package he doesnt suck though as a player.

That said like I have posted earlier I wouldnt want Vick on the Skins. Mainly because Campbell has just as much ability as a passer. Im mainly banking on Campbell stepping up his game in a contract year.
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2009, 10:30 PM   #164
Brian Orakpo
Guest
 
Brian Orakpo's Avatar
 
Posts: n/a
Re: The Vick Factor

Quote:
Originally Posted by Slingin Sammy 33 View Post
52.6 Comp % sucks, his TD-INT ratio is nothing to write home about.
I agree about the completion %. He isnt a good passer. When you factor in his TD-INT ratio with his 1000 yards on the ground he was a good overall player. All im saying is to blanket a statement that Vick sucks is misleading with the numbers he put up in his last year. If you honestly think Vick sucked in 2006 then I dont know what to say.
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2009, 01:15 AM   #165
John Denny
Special Teams
 
John Denny's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Ocean Pines, MD
Posts: 137
Re: The Vick Factor

Quote:
Originally Posted by Slingin Sammy 33 View Post
His last 2 years of playing he sucked, 15-16 record, QB rating under 76. Hasn't been in an NFL training program in over 2 years, let alone in a game.
Who says he has to be a full-time starter? Aside from breaking dogs backs over his knee, Vick was born to run the Wildcat offense. He doesn't have to throw the ball! It's essentially a running play. Imagine Vick, Portis, and Betts in the backfield with Moss running downfield and whoever else emerges in the starting lineup. Vick doesn't have to throw but he does have the arm strength to get the ball to the target.
The wildcat offense keeps defenses honest by running backs (qb included) in several directions (right, left and up the middle) which ultimately opens up running lanes.
I'm a dog owner and I think what Vick did was brutal but I want the skins to win so sign the guy to the league minimum (2yrs), let him get his feet under him and cut him loose.
Anybody remember Portis and Samuels defending Vick during the vick circus? They had no problem with dog-fighting and nobody's dick got hard.
__________________
DIE-NASTY
John Denny is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:30 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.27936 seconds with 11 queries